GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Quiz

Chapter 11 Quiz

Sandra Bell 25 questions

Take the quiz

Questions in this quiz (25)

  1. 1A city in California has asked Professor Rodriguez to conduct an experiment on earthquake preparedness. Professor Rodriguez will assess the preparedness of a random sample of residents in the city and the city will mail out their annual brochure on earthquake safety. Then, 2 weeks later, he will again assess the preparedness of those residents. Right after the brochures are mailed, a large earthquake is reported in Japan. Which threat to internal validity does this pose?
    1. Aselection
    2. Btesting
    3. Chistory
    4. Dmaturation
  2. 2An instructor hypothesizes that doing jumping jacks will improve his students' quiz performance. On Monday, he has his class sit in their chairs for 5 minutes before completing a multiple-choice quiz on their reading assignment. On Wednesday, he has his class do 2 minutes of jumping jacks before completing the same quiz that they took on Monday. The students performed better on the quiz on Wednesday. Which is a possible threat to internal validity in this study?
    1. Aobserver bias
    2. Btesting
    3. Cmaturation
    4. Dattrition
  3. 3As part of an experiment on the effects of behavior modeling, a set of raters are evaluating prosocial behavior in a series of videotapes of a preschool class. Initially, the raters were quite strict in their ratings, but after 3 hours of rating, their criteria had changed. Which type of threat to internal validity has occurred?
    1. Ainstrumentation
    2. Btesting
    3. Chistory
    4. Dregression to the mean
  4. 4Dr. Harrison wants to test the effectiveness of the support group he runs for undergraduates who have drinking problems. He recruits a group of students who have been referred to the counseling center. He randomizes them to two groups: a structured-session group and an unstructured-session group. The structured-session group attends 10 structured support-group sessions at 8:00 a.m. on Fridays that are facilitated by Dr. Harrison. The unstructured-session group attends 10 unstructured meetings at 3:00 p.m. on Wednesdays that are facilitated by members of the group. Several of the participants in the structured-session group stop attending after just a couple of sessions. All the members of the unstructured-session group attend their meeting regularly. At the end of the 10 weeks, Dr. Harrison measures drinking behavior of the people who are still attending the groups. He finds the drinking behavior of people who attended all 10 structured-group sessions is less than the drinking behavior of people who attended all 10 unstructured-group sessions.

    Which kind of threat to internal validity should Dr. Harrison be concerned about?
    1. Aselection-attrition threat
    2. Bselection-history threat
    3. Cmaturation threat
    4. Dregression threat
  5. 5Dr. Robinson designs an intervention meant to reduce college students' risky sexual decisions. She hypothesizes that shaming college students about their risky sexual decisions will improve their decision-making. She recruits participants and randomly assigns them to two conditions: the intervention group and the control group. The sexual behavior of all participants is measured in a pretest interview with Dr. Robinson. After the pretest interview, participants in the intervention group are scheduled for an individual shaming session with Dr. Robinson. The control group does not receive the shaming session. One week after the intervention, both groups are interviewed by Dr. Robinson about their sexual behavior during the past week. She finds that the intervention group reported less-risky sexual decisions than the control group in the posttest interview. In which way could Dr. Robinson improve the internal validity of her study?
    1. AShe could make it a masked design.
    2. BShe could make it a posttest-only design.
    3. CShe could change the design to avoid ceiling effects.
    4. DShe could change the design to be within-group.
  6. 6Emma is planning an experiment to examine whether reading to children increases their vocabulary size. She plans to measure the vocabulary size of a group of 18-month-old children, read to them three times a week for 3 months, then measure their vocabulary size again. Emma could change the design of the study to remove a major threat to internal validity by doing which of the following?
    1. AShe could add a manipulation check.
    2. BShe could make it a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    3. CShe could counterbalance her conditions.
    4. DShe could add a comparison group.
  7. 7Emma is planning an experiment to examine whether reading to children increases their vocabulary size. She plans to measure the vocabulary size of a group of 18-month-old children, read to them three times a week for 3 months, then measure their vocabulary size again. Which threat to internal validity should she be most concerned about?
    1. Ainstrumentation
    2. Bmaturation
    3. Cdemand characteristics
    4. Dorder effect
  8. 8Frances conducted a study on the concreteness on memory in her dorm. She created a list of 12 items that are very concrete (e.g., pencil and table) and a list of 12 items that are very abstract (e.g., justice and freedom). Each item was viewed for 1 second, then participants recalled them in order. Ten participants were randomly assigned to each list of items. The study showed null effects. Which is a possible explanation for this null effect?
    1. Aexternal distractions that lead to unsystematic variability
    2. Btoo much between-group difference
    3. Cnot enough within-group variability
    4. Dparticipants dropping out in only one condition
  9. 9Frances investigated the effect of concreteness on memory. She created a list of 12 items that are very concrete (e.g., pencil and table) and a list of 12 items that are very abstract (e.g., justice and freedom). Each item was viewed for 1 second, then participants recalled them in order. Ten participants were randomly assigned to each list of items. The study showed null effects, and almost all the participants remembered all the words on both lists. Which is a likely solution?
    1. AChange to a posttest-only design.
    2. BChange the design to be double-blind.
    3. CChange the design to eliminate ceiling effects.
    4. DChange the design to be within-groups.
  10. 10Frances investigated the effect of concreteness on memory. She created a list of 12 items that are very concrete (e.g., pencil and table) and a list of 12 items that are very abstract (e.g., justice and freedom). Each item was viewed for 1 second, then participants recalled them in order. Ten participants were randomly assigned to each list of items. The study showed null effects and large variability within the groups. Which is a likely solution?
    1. AAdd more participants.
    2. BChange the design to a posttest-only design
    3. CChange to a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    4. DRetrain the observers.

Information

Description
Quiz on Chapter 11 Quiz, created by Sandra Bell on 24/11/2020.
Language
English
Views
2
Rating
No ratings yet
Rate this quiz
Rate this quiz

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?