Mindmap
Gender Theorists
Inhalt der Mindmap
Gender Theorists
Trugill (1983)
- Women's pronouncitation is closer to RP than males.
Cheshire (1982)
- Men tend to use more non-grammatical forms. "Ain't", "innit" etc.
Lakoff (1975)
- Women use hedges/fillers, tag questions, indirect speech, intensifiers.
- Argues that these features make women seem more inferior and needy to men.
- O'barr & Atkins (1980)
- Challenges Lakoff - argues that men and women of low social status used features that Lakoff suggests.
- O'barr & Atkins (1980)
- Argues that these features make women seem more inferior and needy to men.
- Women use hedges/fillers, tag questions, indirect speech, intensifiers.
Tanner (1990)
- Men: more concerned with status. Interrupt more, direct speech, approaches conflict.
- Women: more interested in bonds. Talk less/agree more, indirect speech, avoids conflict, offers support.
Beattie (1982)
- Challenges Zimmerman & West who thought that men's interruptions were a sign of dominance (supports Lakoff). Say that it could be to show support.
Zimmerman & West (1975)
- Did a study among students where 96% of interruptions in conversation were made by men. Suggests dominance.
- Perhaps a bias study, as it was only done among students.
- Did a study among students where 96% of interruptions in conversation were made by men. Suggests dominance.
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- A-Level English Language (A2) (Language and Gender ) Mindmap am Gender Theorists, erstellt von Jake Flaxman am 06/01/2016.
- Erstellt von
- Jake Flaxman
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung