Mindmap
Product liability
Inhalt der Mindmap
Product liability
Can be brought in one of two ways
- Consumer Protection Act 1987
- By an act of Negligence
- There is an automatic duty of care from manufacturer to consumer
- 'Manufacturer' has been widened to include retailers
- Kuback v Holland
- 'Consumer' has been widened to include any person In contact with the product
- Grant v Austrailian knitting mills
- Neighbour principle - Donoghue v Stevenson
- You need to prove Breach of duty
- Risk factors lower the standard of care
- Special characteristics of the defendant
- Proffesionals
- Bolam v Friern test
- Wells v Cooper
- Proffesionals
- Special characteristics of the claimant
- Paris v Stepney borough council
- Size of risk
- Haley v London borough council
- Benefits of the risk
- Watt v Hertfordshire
- Were all practical precautions taken?
- Latimer v AEC
- Special characteristics of the defendant
- Need to prove Damage
- Causation
- Legal
- Wagon Mound case
- Factual
- Barnett v Chealsea
- Legal
- Remoteness
- Foreseeability
- Wagan mound
- Type of damage
- Bradford v Robinson rentals
- Hughes v Lord Advocate
- Thin skull rule
- Smith v Leech Brain
- Foreseeability
- Are there any possible defences?
- Contributary negligence
- Law Reform Act 1945
- Contributary negligence
- Causation
- Risk factors lower the standard of care
- 'Manufacturer' has been widened to include retailers
- There is an automatic duty of care from manufacturer to consumer
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- A-Levels Law (Law of Tort) Mindmap am Product liability, erstellt von Sophie.J.E am 09/09/2013.
- Erstellt von
- Sophie.J.E
- Aufrufe
- 69
- Tags
- Bewertung