GoConqr hat ein neues Design! Sag uns, wie es dir gefällt.

Mindmap

Comparison b/w SAN and NAS

Karthik R Computer Science Englisch

Inhalt der Mindmap

Comparison b/w SAN and NAS

  1. SAN

    • High Performance
    • Low-Latency
    • May require a seperate Ethernet for file Traffic and to keep fibre channel network clear for better performance
    • SAN Volume appear and performs as if it were directly connected to Hard Drive
    • Ensures highest speed for media transmission
    • Can be scalled to the limits of the interconnect
    • Is of High cost
    • Administration Requirements Exists
  2. NAS

    • FIle Based data storage
    • Simple to set-it up and deploy
    • Arranged in RAID order
      • Redundant Array of Independent Disks
    • Maintains their own IP
    • Sends and Recieves files by Ethernet
    • Ability to replace and upgrade Hardware
    • Inexpensive and automatic Backups
    • Can't scale after an Extent
    • Due to its Ethernet some packets may get delayed or may get lost
    • Latency can be an issue if the files are heavy

Informationen

Beschreibung
Computer Science Mindmap am Comparison b/w SAN and NAS, erstellt von Karthik R am 24/03/2022.
Erstellt von
Karthik R
Aufrufe
0
Bewertung

Mehr zu SAN and NAS

Feedback

Worum geht es?

Wie gefällt dir das neue Design?

Dein Eindruck