O GoConqr está de visual novo! Conte para nós o que você achou.

Mapa mental

Comparison b/w SAN and NAS

Karthik R Computer Science Inglês

Conteúdo do mapa

Comparison b/w SAN and NAS

  1. SAN

    • High Performance
    • Low-Latency
    • May require a seperate Ethernet for file Traffic and to keep fibre channel network clear for better performance
    • SAN Volume appear and performs as if it were directly connected to Hard Drive
    • Ensures highest speed for media transmission
    • Can be scalled to the limits of the interconnect
    • Is of High cost
    • Administration Requirements Exists
  2. NAS

    • FIle Based data storage
    • Simple to set-it up and deploy
    • Arranged in RAID order
      • Redundant Array of Independent Disks
    • Maintains their own IP
    • Sends and Recieves files by Ethernet
    • Ability to replace and upgrade Hardware
    • Inexpensive and automatic Backups
    • Can't scale after an Extent
    • Due to its Ethernet some packets may get delayed or may get lost
    • Latency can be an issue if the files are heavy

Informações

Descrição
Computer Science Mapa Mental sobre Comparison b/w SAN and NAS, criado por Karthik R em 24-03-2022.
Criado por
Karthik R
Visualizações
0
Avaliação

Mais sobre SAN and NAS

Fale Conosco

Sobre o que é sua mensagem?

O que você acha do novo visual?

Você gostou?