GoConqr hat ein neues Design! Sag uns, wie es dir gefällt.

Mindmap

Quality Process: Programme Review

Y Valdez (oyohva Englisch

Quality Process: Programme Review

Inhalt der Mindmap

Quality Process: Programme Review

  1. What needs to be done for a successful review?

    • Submission of documentation
      • Statistical data
      • Examiner reports
      • Programme monitoring reports
      • Formal and informal student feedback
      • Financial reports
      • Evidence of quality enhancement activity
    • Panel visit
      • Who is involved?
        • The programme team
        • The Panel Chair
        • The Panel Officer
        • The academic staff lead
      • What is done?
        • Event Scope established
        • identify logical and logistical arrangements
        • identify the structure and agenda for the event
        • Establish the readiness of documentation
  2. What is the timeline for review

    • Start the review at least one calendar year in advance
    • Deadlines are guided by the partner instiution's directives
  3. What are the departmental and institutional responsibilities involved in completing the process

    • Departmental
      • Determine and evaluation of programme learning goals
      • Review educational components of the programme
      • Identify instructional components
      • Student advisement and mentoring
      • Identification of necessary Infrastructure
      • Educational Environmental considerations
    • The institution
      • Review of departmental needs
      • Implementation of approved plans
      • Documentation of process
      • Discussion with and among internal and external entities
  4. Formal outcomes

    • Re-Approval based on a revised partnership agreement
    • Non Approval
      • Feedback is given
        • A reasonable time allotment is given
          • A re-review is conducted where a final decision is made
  5. How international collaboration impacts the process

    • Facilitates the process through mutual participation
    • Creates opportunity for new developments
    • Documentation of changes for full comprehension
    • Consideration of future needs of the country and students
  6. Who should be involved?

    • All stages
      • Strategic Managers
      • Teaching staff
      • Students
    • When the nature of the programme is defined
      • Employers
      • Professional bodies
      • Industry representatives
  7. Management of external expectations/requirements

    • Periodic critical appraisals
    • Consideration of views from
      • Student
      • Staff
      • Examiners
      • Employers

Bilder und Dateien der Mindmap

  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review
  • Quality Process: Programme Review

Informationen

Beschreibung
Mindmap for PGCERT in HE. Scenario 1B
Erstellt von
Y Valdez (oyohva
Aufrufe
62
Bewertung

Feedback

Worum geht es?

Wie gefällt dir das neue Design?

Dein Eindruck