CONSIDERATION

CONSIDERATION

1. INTRODUCTION

   • Shadwell v Shadwell [1860]
     • Dickinson v Abel [1969]
       • Pitts v Jones [2007]

2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES

   • Roscola v Thomas [1842]
     • Re McArdle [1951]
       • Re Casey's Patent [1892]
         • Pao On v Yiu Long [1980]
         • Tweddle v Atkinson [1861]
           • Dunlop v Selfridge [1915]

3. THE CONSIDERATION NEED NOT BE ADEQUATE

   • Thomas v Thomas [1842]
     • Chappel v Nestle Ltd [1960]
       • Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Custom and Exercise [1976]

4. THE CONSIDERATION MUST BE SUFFICIENT

   • Ward v Byham [1956]
     • Collins v Godfroy [1831]
       • Glass brook Bros v Glamorgan CC [1923]
   • Scotson v Pegg [1861]
     • Stilk v Myrick
       • Pinel's Case [1602]
         • Foakes v Beer [1884]
           • Williams & Roffey v Nicholls [1991]
             • Re Selectmove Ltd [1995]
               • Collier v P & M.J Wright Ltd [2007]
           • Hartley v Ponsonby [1857]

5. WAIVER, VARIATION AND ESTOPPEL

   • Central London Property Trust v High Trees House [1947]
     • Hughes v Metropolitan Railway [1877]
       • Combe v Combe [1951]
         • Tool Metal Manufacturing v Tungsten Electric [1955]
   • D & C Builders v Rees [1966]
     • W.J. Alan & Co. v El Nasr Export and Import [2007]
       • Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa S.A v Nigerian Produce Marketing [1972]