Fichas
Presumptions-Statutory Interpretation
Fichas del conjunto (8)
- 1What are the 5 common presumptions?The more lenient option will prevail.
Presumption in favour of liberty.
Need for mens era in criminal statutes
Consistent with International Law
Only to have prospective not retrospective effect - 2Legal Presumptions should be used when:there are unclear changes to the law, absurd results, relates to criminal behaviour and the need for mens rea, law doesn't apply retrospectively, it could cause an injustice.
- 3Nairn v University Courts of St Andrews and EdinburghHeld that such a fundamental change in law needed to be decided and changed by the court.
- 4Lord Esher in Tuck and Sons v PriesterThe option of interpretation which is more lenient will be chosen
- 5McCullough J in R v HallstromPresumption in favour of individual liberty (mental patient)
- 6Sweet v ParsleyPresumption in favour of need for a mens era in criminal statutes
- 7Bloxham v FavrePresumed to be consistent with international law
- 8Secretary of state for social security v TunnicliffePresumed only to have prospective effect
Información
- Descripción
- Fichas sobre Presumptions-Statutory Interpretation, creado por Fionnuala Mendha el 22/07/2014.
- Creado por
- Fionnuala Mendha
- Visitas
- 18
- Valoración