The Nature Nurture debate in
psychology is concerned with the
extent to which some aspects of
different behaviour are either a
product of inheritance or have been
learned/ aquired
This is used to explain
how some behaviours
are genetically inherited
whereas some may be
learned throughout the
person's life
Characteristics and
differences that aren't
observable at birth are
said to emerge later in life
due to maturation
Some say we have a
sort of "biological
clock" which switches
on and off certain
behaviours in a
pre-programmed way
An example of
physical maturation
would be puberty
Nativists believe in this
approach, believing that there
isn't just biological maturation
(e.g. puberty) but that there is
also psychological maturation
Nativists adopt an
extreme belief on the
hereditary argument
in this debate
Environmentalists make the
assumption that at birth the
mind is a blank slate and over
time it's filled due to an
increasing amount of
experience
This is the argument
where it's believed that
psychological
characteristics and
differences in behaviour
are learned over time
and not necessarily
inherited
They believe that it's how you are brought
up in your childhood in which governs the
psychologically significant aspects of child
development
This argues that the concept of
maturation applies only to the
biological not psychological
Free Will vs Determinism
The Determinist approach proposes
that all types of behavioure is the
product of preceding factors and is
therefore predictable
The casual/basic
laws of
determinism
forms the basis
of science
Free will is the idea
that each person is
able to have some
choice in how we
act
This assumes that we
are free to choose our
behaviour and in fact
that we are self
determined
Determinism
Some approaches
within psychology see
this source as being
beyond the individual
This is known as
environmental
determinism
Other approaches
would see it as
coming from the
inside of the
human
This would be in the
form of unconscious
motivation or
genetic determinism
Free Will
This is a main
assumption of
the humanistic
approach and it's
that humans
have free will
This means that
not all behaviour
is determined
For humanistic psychologists,
freedom is not only possible,
however it's also necessary for
each individual to become fully
functional human beings
Cognitive psychologists
are also inclined to
attribute importance to
free will and adopt only a
small determinist view
They focus more on the choice of
means rather than focussing on our
choice of ends in which humanists do
They focus on making a
decision that has their
main interest
Reductionism vs Holism
The reductionist would
say that "the simple is the
source of complex"
Essentially, to explain a complex
phenomenon, the person must
reduce the large, complex idea to
more constituent elements
The Holist believes
that the whole is
much more than
just many parts
This debate is a large controversy
in which raises many questions
about the nature of explanation
Reductionism
The belief that human behaviour
can be explained if it's broken down
into smaller component parts in
which cause the end result
They look at the very simplest parts that make
up our systems and use the simplest
explanations to understand how they then work
It's based on the
scientific assumption
of parsimony
This means
theta the
complex
phenomena is
easiest explained
by the simplest
underlying
principles
Holism
This refers to any approach
in which emphasized the
whole rather than the
smaller constituent parts
This approach therefore suggests that
there is to be many different levels of
explanation and that at each level there
are emergent properties
These emergent properties cannot be
reduced as used in reductionism
Ideographic vs Nomothetic
Psychologists who
adopt the
nomothetic
approach are
concerned with
studying what we
share with others
That is to say in
establishing laws
or generalizations
Psychologists who adopt the
idiographic idea are more interested
in discovering what makes ever
human unique and individual
Personality
Personality has been
split into 5 parts and
that all these small
traits sum up to make
our overall personality
From a nomothetic
point of view these
parts are considered
to adequately describe
the psychologically
significant aspects of
any individual
personality
From a Idiographic
point of view, the 5
parts don't
adequately explain
the personality, for
example Gordon
Allport found over
18,000 separate
terms in which
described personal
characteristics
Culture Bias
Culture bias is when someone or a
group of people have the tendency
to judge other people based on their
cultural assumptions
Ethocentrism
This is when someone will see the world from their
own singular cultural perspective and believing that
one's own belief is normal and correct
Ethnocentrism tends to be referred to as a lack of awareness of the fact
that other cultural perspectives and beliefs are just as valid as one's own
Rack (1984) claims how
African-Caribbeans in Britain are
sometimes diagnosed as being so
called mentally ill, this is becauase oif
their behaviour in which is normal for
their subculture but not Britain's
Cultural
Relativism
Cultural relativism says how
behaviour can only be fully
understood if all cultural context
is taken into consideration
This viewpoint believes
that the meaning of
intelligence is different
depending on each culture
Gender Bias
The Gender bias in society
causes differential treatments
of both males and females
throughout society
These are mainly
based on stereotypes
Some typical stereotypes as
found by Maccoboy and
Jacklin in 1974 would be:
Girls
Less
aggressive
Greater
verbal
ability
Boys
Greater
arithmetical
ability
Greater
visual/spacial
abilities
Androcentrism
Means
centred/dominated
by males and can be
both conscious and
unconscious
Most psychologists
used to be males so
there tended to be a
highly male point of
view within their
research
Alpha Bias
This is when the differences between males
and females are highly exaggerated
The evolutionary approach in
psychology is highly criticised
because of this as it was used
to explain why men were
more "dominant"
Beta Bias
Beta bias
ignores all
differences
between
females and
males
Findings are often
assumed to apply
to both males
and females
Ethical Implications
Ethical Implications
of Research Studies
An example would
be Milgram's
research in 1963
In this research the participants
were deceived and were unable
to give any fully formed consent
The participants were
forced to continue
against their own will
The participants were then debriefed
after the research and a year later
showed no signs of long term effects
Ethical implications
of Theories
Bowlby's
Theory of
Attatchment
This theory suggests that children form
one special attatchment bond, which is
usually with their mother
This takes place in a
critical period and can
affect future relationships
This encourages that a women's
place is at home with her
children in which could make
some motheres feel guilty for
goint back to work
These implications are
the effects or
consequences of
research and theories
within psychology