Mapa mental
Semantics
Contenido del mapa
Semantics
Sense and Reference
Entailment, Presupposition, Implicature
- Entailment
- anything that follows directly from the literal truth of a sentence
- a proposition P entails a proposition Q if whenever P is true, Q must also be true
- equation:
- a. P = A is a man
- b. Q = A is male
- a. P = A is a man
- example 1
- a. P = A has a son
- b. Q = A has a daughter
- c. R = A has at least 2 kids
- R = entailed by the combination of P & Q
- c. R = A has at least 2 kids
- b. Q = A has a daughter
- a. P = A has a son
- example 2
- a. A = I can't meet you on Monday or Tuesday but I can definitely meet you before Friday
- entailment: I will meet you Wednesday or Thursday
- a. A = I can't meet you on Monday or Tuesday but I can definitely meet you before Friday
- entailments can follow from singular sentences and several sentences
- Presupposition
- a conclusion that we can draw from the sentence being understandable
- something that must be true for a sentence to make sense
- example 1
- A. Someone called me, it might be my brother
- Presupposition: I must have a brother
- A. Someone called me, it might be my brother
- presuppositions are invariant in negation
- NEGATION TEST
- aka: how to tell the difference between presuppositions and entailments
- a. If when P isn't true, Q is
- b. If when P isn't true, Q isn't true
- PRESUPPOSITION
- ENTAILMENT
- a. If when P isn't true, Q is
- aka: how to tell the difference between presuppositions and entailments
- Implicature
- Conventional Implicatures
- what is suggested, although not expressed nor strictly entailed by an utterance
- always the same regardless to words, focuses on lexical features
- CONTEXT INDEPENDENT
- the difference where the speaker's attention is laughed and cried
- example 1
- A. John laughed and Mary cried
- B. John laughed but Mary cried
- B is suggesting laughed and cried are a contrast
- both sentences have to be true to make sense --- both are associated with individual words
- B is suggesting laughed and cried are a contrast
- B. John laughed but Mary cried
- A. John laughed and Mary cried
- CONTEXT INDEPENDENT
- Conversational Implicatures
- inferences not only from sentences but from the particular context
- CONTEXT DEPENDENT
- presuppositions are about what the speaker and hearer KNOW about the context of the sentence
- CIs are about things they AGREE that are not related to the special case description in the sentence
- A. Am I late for tea?
- B. I've cleared the table. But give me five minutes, I'll make you something.
- a. Have you cleared the table and washed up?
- b. i. I've cleared the table
- b. ii. I've taken everything off the table
- b. i. I've cleared the table
- a. I like apples
- a. Have you cleared the table and washed up?
- B. I've cleared the table. But give me five minutes, I'll make you something.
- 4 Aspects of Conversational Implicatures
- 1. Context Dependence
- always depends on context
- CIs can be cancelled by additional info
- the additional information cancels out the CI that they are late for dinner
- must be calculable by general principles
- uttering (a) when offered an apple/orange
- if not cancelled, (a) indicates want of an apple
- uttering (a) when offered an apple/orange
- must be calculable by general principles
- cannot detach from the meaning - it is attached to the PROPOSITION (meaning) if a sentence
- if utterance is paraphrased, the CI remains
- contrasts with BUT v AND but CI remains
- the additional information cancels out the CI that they are late for dinner
- CIs can be cancelled by additional info
- always depends on context
- 3. Non-detachability
- 2. Cancellability
- 4. Calculability
- 1. Context Dependence
- The Cooperative Principles
- Herbert Paul Grice, 1967 - what people abide by in order for conversation to function
- most speakers don't adhere unless evidence given, most assume rule = followed
- a. If that's a genuine Picasso then I'm the Queen of Wales
- a. Some students came
- b. Most students came
- c. All students came
- a. That's my mother and her husband standing there
- b. Most students came
- a. Some students came
- CI =not a genuine Picasso
- flouting = a metaphor
- a. If that's a genuine Picasso then I'm the Queen of Wales
- Relation
- must have info related to the topic
- a. Are the neighbours home?
- b. Their car isn't there
- CI = neighbours aren't home
- a. Are the neighbours home?
- must have info related to the topic
- CIs = scalar implicatures (scale of quantity)
- Quantity
- Manner
- if one is altered, others are false
- the speaker HAS to utter most maximally informative sentence
- being under-informative implies being heard
- the way something is said
- CI = husband is not the person's father
- not a great relation, perhaps
- CI = husband is not the person's father
- Quantity
- most speakers don't adhere unless evidence given, most assume rule = followed
- Quality
- Herbert Paul Grice, 1967 - what people abide by in order for conversation to function
- inferences not only from sentences but from the particular context
- Conventional Implicatures
- Entailment
Información
- Descripción
- (Semantics) Linguistics Mapa Mental sobre Semantics, creado por Cathi Howe el 24/12/2018.
- Creado por
- Cathi Howe
- Visitas
- 3
- Valoración