Mapa mental
Eyewitness testimony (EWT)
Contenido del mapa
Eyewitness testimony (EWT)
Definition
- Encoding
- Retains
- Retrieves
- Retains
- Encoding
Accuracy
- Loftus and Palmer
- Leading questions
- Changed the verb
- Hit to smashed
- Speed estimate was higher with smashed
- Yuille and Cutshall
- Armed robbery
- Real life event
- 4 months later with leading questions- no effect
- Armed robbery
- Loftus and Palmer
Misleading information
- Loftus and Palmer
- Asked if they saw broken glass
- Smashed verb- more 'saw' glass
- Loftus et al
- 41% given a misleading question picked correctly
- 'STOP' and 'YIELD'
- Bekerian and Bowers
- Replicated the Loftus study
- Gave the slides in original order
- Now no difference in recall
- Misleading questions affect retrieval not storage
- Now no difference in recall
- Loftus and Palmer
Anxiety
- Deffenbacher et al
- Meta-analysis of 18 studies
- High levels of stress negatively impacted accuracy
- Christianson and Hubinette
- 58 witnesses to bank robberies
- Anxiety increased accuracy of EWT
- Contradiction of the studies explained by the Yerkes-Dodson law
- Weapon-focus effect
- Loftus et al
- 49% accurate if man has pen
- 33% accurate with knife
- Deffenbacher et al
Age
- Parker and Carranza
- Identification after mock crime
- Kids chose more but were wrong
- Yarmey
- Young and middle aged more confident
- No difference in accuracy
- Memon et al
- No difference if short delay
- Older were less accurate with a week delay
- Anastasi and Rhodes
- Own age bias
- Differential experience hyp
- More contact = better memory for them
- Differential experience hyp
- Own age bias
- Parker and Carranza
Información
- Descripción
- Mapa Mental sobre Eyewitness testimony (EWT), creado por georgiacresswell el 12/05/2014.
- Creado por
- georgiacresswell
- Visitas
- 23
- Valoración