Animations mood board

Animations mood board

1. ·

   • Very intuitive/easy to use
   • A large number of links in one place
   • Fonts/colours are easily readable
   • Categories make finding things fast
   • Very common, so easy to create
   • Not eye-catching
   • Not necessary for Freeline
   • Easy but time consuming to create
   • Client side code not widely compatible
   • Won't fit on smaller screens
   • HTML/JavaScript is compatible
   • May not work on mobile screens/browsers
   • Consists of text, script and markup - file size is miniscule
   • White style contrasts the dark text - makes it readable

2. ·

   • Functional - easy to use
   • Room for text - static text is easily readable
   • Easy to create
   • Lots of details
   • Compatible with lots of browsers
   • Even if the gallery doesn't work, the text will remain
   • Not very eye-catching
   • Needs more emphasis on visuals
   • Not very flexible
   • Code for preset galleries could be subject to copyright
   • Java is widely compatible
   • Images are small, with a large verison
   • Thumbnails are tiny - very fast load time
   • Dark colours may contrast from a plain website

3. ·

   • Fits well on the page
   • Movement is eye catching
   • Animation fits a lot of information into a small space
   • Links straight to webstie
   • Loads quickly
   • Small size means high quality image
   • Too small - can't fit much information at once
   • Not compatible with mobile devices
   • Blends in with website - looks appealing, but not eye catching
   • Not many details - what is Worcester Bosch Group?
   • White is clear and makes colours stand out
   • Flash is interactive/small
   • Vectors are scalable
   • High quality image but small size in pixels

4. Advantages

5. Format

6. Disadvantages

Imágenes y archivos del mapa