Energy Security - Future Management Schemes
Diapositivas del conjunto (6)
-
- This means that energy consumption will not change
-
- Advantages:
- Cheap as no change needed.
- Allows LEDC nations to develop their economies through manufacturing.
- Disadvantages:
- Carbon dioxide emissions will continue to rise, predicted to be a 55% increase in energy related emissions by 2030.
- The finite source of fossil fuels could run out - greater energy insecurity.
- Developing countries may lose out as they have to spend more money of strategies to cope with climate change.
- General environmental degradation.
-
- A multi energy solution means meeting the future energy needs through a mixture of of non-renewable, recyclable and renewable energy sources. This ensures energy security whilst still maintaining affordability.
-
- Advantages:
- There will be a slight reduction in carbon dioxide emissions due to the use of cleaner energy.
- Disadvantages:
- Expensive.
- The issue of Nuclear energy is a controversial one due to the threat of a nuclear disaster (Fukishima, 2011), the concern surrounding waste disposal and the huge cost (Hinkley Point C Power Station estimated at £24.5 billion).
-
- This is simply decreasing the amount of energy used, through the creation of radical technologies. It can be done through a variety of strategies:
- Better housing insulation.
- Subsidising solar panels for domestic use.
-
- Advantages:
- Likely decrease in global carbon dioxide emissions, reducing the greenhouse effect.
- Extension of the time that fossil fuels can be used.
- Disadvantages:
- Likely to inhabit the development of LEDC nations due to the increased cost or decreased accessibility to fuel for manufacturing processes.
- Expensive.
Información
- Descripción
- A-Level (Energy Security) Geography Diapositivas sobre Energy Security - Future Management Schemes, creado por ellenncboardman el 29/02/2016.
- Creado por
- ellenncboardman · feb 2016
- Actualizado
- 9 jun 2016
- Visitas
- 2
- Valoración