Test
Social Influence Quiz- Psychology (Version 2)
Este test tiene tipos de pregunta que se abren en el reproductor de siempre.
Preguntas del test (63)
1Label the top table with the correct number (level of conformity) and correct letter (effects), as are found in the bottom table
- A2
- B1
- C3
- DC
- EB
- FA
2Informational Social Influence: the need to be [blank_start]right[blank_end]. Often occurs in [blank_start]new[blank_end] situations in which we are unsure how to behave, so we look to others for guidance. Usually, one person or group is seen to be more of an expert.
Normative Social Influence: the need to be [blank_start]liked[blank_end]. This is the preference to gain social approval. It usually occurs in situations with strangers when you fear rejection. However, it can also occur with friends when you want to gain their approval.- Aright
- Bliked
- Cnew
- Dfamiliar
- Eliked
- Fright
3Name an advantage to Normative Social Influence and Informational Social Influence
- AThere is research to support these theories e.g. Lucas (2006) and Asch (1951
- BIndividual differences have little effect on how these explanations of conformity affect our behaviour
- CA distinct separation between NSI and ISI is proposed, suggesting there is no crossover between the two. This means they can easily be distinguished when studying conformity
4Name two disadvantages to Normative Social Influence and Informational Social Influence
- AMay not be two-process - they work together
- BIndividual differences such as personality affect conformity
- CContradictory evidence provided by Asch's study
5Which researcher investigated conformity, and when?
- AAsch, 1951/55
- BMilgram, 1963
- CHofling, 1966
6What was Asch's sample for his conformity study?
- A123 male students
- B40 men between the ages of 20-50 years old
- C22 nurses
7Which of the following descriptions best describes Asch's study?
- AStanford Prison Experiment- conformity to the social roles of guards and prisoners
- BLines of different lengths- confederates gave incorrect answers when asked which line was most similar to 'Line X'. The naive participants' conformity was assessed.
- CShocking memory test- naive participants believed they were teaching another naive participant in order to help improve memory, however had to administer fake shocks up to 450V at 15V intervals. This was testing obedience.
8What percentage of Asch's participants conformed at least once?
- A25%
- B37.5
- C75
- D3
9When interviewed afterwards, Asch's participants (1951) said that they conformed because they wanted to avoid rejection. Which type of conformity is this?
- AIngratiational Social Influence
- BInformational Social Influence
- CNormative Social Influence
10Label the table with the effects Asch's variations had on conformity.
- AOver 3- conformity leveled out at 75%
- BConformity fell
- CConformity fell due to social support
- DConformity increased due to ISI
11Evaluation of Asch's conformity study
The study was a child of its times- America was in a [blank_start]conformist[blank_end] era, possibly explaining the results both in terms of American culture but also meaning that the results can't be generalised today.
The [blank_start]artificial task[blank_end] could have led to demand characteristics, suggesting the participants' behaviour was [blank_start]unnatural[blank_end].
The study also had [blank_start]limited[blank_end] application, both because women could be more conformist, but also because it took place in an [blank_start]individualist[blank_end] culture (America), so can't be generalised to [blank_start]collectivist[blank_end] cultures.
Asch's study suffered the ethical issues of [blank_start]deception[blank_end]; the participants' didn't know that the other men were all confederates.- Aconformist
- Bartificial task
- Cunnatural
- Dnatural
- Elimited
- Freal life
- Gindividualist
- Hcollectivist
- Ideception
- Jpsychological harm
12Which researcher investigated conformity to social roles, and when?
- AZimbardo, 1971
- BMilgram, 1963
- CAsch, 1951
13What was Zimbardo's sample for his conformity to social roles study?
- A123 male students
- B22 nurses
- C40 men between the ages of 20-50 years old
- DVolunteer sample of students who were deemed emotionally stable
14When did Zimbardo's study have to be stopped, and why?
- A6 days into a 14 day study due to the negative effects on the prisoners' psychological and physical wellbeing
- B2 days into a 6 day study due to prisoners rebelling
- C4 days into a 6 day study due to the guards asking to be removed from the study
15What kind of behaviour did the 'guards' demonstrate in Zimbardo's study of conformity to social roles?
- AThey aimed to divide the prisoners, harassed them, and became hostile.
- BThey attempted to unite the prisoners who rebelled, but without success
- CThey became subdued and depressed as a result of their roles
16What kind of behaviour did the prisoners' demonstrate in Zimbardo's study of conformity to social roles?
- AThey became aggressive and hostile, ultimately overthrowing the guards
- BThey initially rebelled, but ended up becoming subdued and depressed
- CThey embraced their roles, happy to obey the guards
17'In Zimbardo's study, we can come to the conclusion that both prisoners and guards conformed to social roles, suggesting situation has a powerful effect on our behaviour'
Is this statement true or false?- AVerdadero
- BFalso
18Name two advantages of Zimbardo's study into conformity to social roles.
- AGood control of variables- the emotional stability of participants was ensured, so emotional instability wasn't a confounding variable.
- BGood internal validity- 90% of prisoners' conversations were based on prison life, suggesting they believed it to be real.
- CResearch support from Reicher and Haslam's partial replication of Zimbardo's study
- DObjective assessment of the participants' behaviour as Zimbardo played the role of prison warden
19Name four disadvantages of Zimbardo's study of conformity to social roles
- ALack of realism- participants were play-acting based on stereotypes from film
- BRole of dispositional factors- personality may affect conformity to social roles
- CLack of research support- Reicher and Haslam's replication found that prisoners rebelled and took control of the guards
- DMethodological/ethical issues- Zimbardo was prison warden so had a subjective view, plus the prisoners suffered psychological
- EEthical issues- prisoners were referred to by their full names, leading to a lack of confidentiality
- FPoor control of variables, such as the influence of emotional instability
- GPoor internal validity as the participants were assigned to each role based on personality
20Which researcher investigated obedience, and when?
- AAsch, 1951
- BZimbardo, 1971
- CMilgram, 1963
- DAdorno, 1950
21What prompted Milgram to investigate obedience?
- ANazi Germans in the Second World War
- BAmericans in the Civil War
- CLa Guerra Civil Española- the role of the nationalists
22What was Milgram's sample for his obedience study?
- A123 male students
- B40 men between the ages of 20-50 years old, paid $4.50
- C22 nurses
- DVolunteer sample of students from Stanford
23Which of the following descriptions best describes Milgram's study?
- AShocking memory test- naive participants believed they were teaching another naive participant in order to help improve memory, however had to administer fake shocks up to 450V at 15V intervals. This was testing obedience.
- BStanford Prison Experiment- conformity to social roles
- CLine of best fit- participants had to match the most similar line to Line X, but the naive participants was in a group of confederates who gave consistently wrong answers. Conformity was assessed.
24In Milgram's study, the researcher gave four responses when the participant asked to stop. What was the general phrasing of them?
- A'You have the right to withdraw'
- B'The experiment requires that you continue'
- C'You're a weak man if you don't continue'
- D'You aren't allowed to stop because then we can't assess obedience'
25Results of Milgram's study
[blank_start]0[blank_end]% of participants stopped before 300V
[blank_start]12.5[blank_end]% stopped at 300V
[blank_start]65[blank_end]% continued to 450V- A0
- B3
- C35
- D12.5
- E65
- F12.5
- G65
- H0
- I3
- J35
- K65
- L0
- M12.5
- N3
- O35
26What was the qualitative data that Milgram collected?
- ANumber of volts participants continued to
- BReactions to stress e.g. seizures, sweating
- CParticipants were asked how they felt every time they increased the voltage. There responses were recorded.
27What percentage of Milgram's participants claimed they were 'glad they took part' when answering a follow-up questionnaire?
- A3%
- B84%
- C65%
- D0%
- E98%
28Name three disadvantages of Milgram's study.
- ALow internal validity- participants didn't believe the shocks were real
- BSocial identity theory as an alternate explanation- this suggests that the participants identified with the experimenter and therefore with the science of the study. The first three prods appealed for help with the science, while the final prod demanded obedience. No participants continued after the 4th prod.
- CEthical issues- Milgram deceived his participants, who didn't know the learner was a confederate, that their role was pre-determined and that the shocks were fake. Some also suffered psychological and physical harm e.g. seizures
- DEthical issues- lack of confidentiality as the participants were referred to be their full names in Milgram's scientific report
- EPoor external validity- the study didn't actually show the relationship between the experimenter and participants. This may be a result of it being a lab study
- FContradictory replication called 'The Game of Death' in which only 20% of participants went to full voltage
29Name three advantages of Milgram's study
- ASupporting evidence from Sheridan and King (1972) who replicated the experiment but with puppies. 54% of males and 100% of females delivered a 'fatal' shock to the puppy.
- BGood external validity- despite being a lab study, the experiment did show the relationship between the experimenter and participants. Hofling (1966) conducted a study on nurses in which 21 out of 22 nurses obeyed orders from a fake doctor despite it being prohibited, suggesting people do obey perceived authority figures.
- CSupporting replication from 'The Game of Death' TV show, in which 80% of participants administered fake shocks of 460V. They displayed similar distressed behaviour as Milgram's participants.
- DEthically good- participants felt minimal distress and were informed in the brief about the true aims of the study
- EHigh internal validity- all participants reported believing that the shocks were real
- FResearcher bias- because Milgram was the experimenter, he had a subjective view on the participants' behaviour and his behaviour may have influenced theirs, hence reducing the validity of the study
30Fill in the blank spaces with the correct situational variables, as proposed by Milgram
[blank_start]Proximity[blank_end]- 1. when the teacher and learner were in the same room. 2. when the teacher had to force the learner's hand onto a shock pad
[blank_start]Location[blank_end]- the experiment took place in a rundown building
[blank_start]Uniform[blank_end]- the experimenter in a lab coat was replaced by an ordinary person (confederate) in everyday clothing- AProximity
- BLocation
- CUniform
31Fill in the x-axis of the graph with the appropriate way in which Milgram tested situational variables (proximity, location, uniform)
- ABaseline study
- BRun down office
- CTeacher and learner in the same room
- DTeacher forces learner's hand
- ETeacher receives the orders via phone
- FMember of public steps in for researcher
32Name three advantages of situational variables
- AResearch support- Bickman (1974) found that the same person wearing three different outfits (e.g. milkman, security guard) received very different responses when asking members of the public to pick up litter according to the uniform they wore.
- BGood internal validity- participants reported after the experiments that they believe the situations to be real and therefore acted naturally.
- CCross-cultural replication- Miranda (1981) found an obedience rate of 90% in Spanish students, meaning Milgram's results aren't limited to America
- DControl of variables- Milgram systematically altered one variable at a time, so the cause of any changes in behaviour was easy to identify
- EMilgram's conclusions can be effectively applied to any culture, including collectivist cultures
33Name three disadvantages of situational variables
- AContradictory evidence- Bickman (1974) found that changing uniform had no significant effect on the public's behaviour when asked to pick up litter
- BLack of internal validity- Orne and Holland suggested that participants didn't believe the situations were real, and therefore acted unnaturally
- CCan only apply to American culture
- DSmith and Bond (1998) pointed out that replications only took place in Western societies which aren't culturally different to the US
- ESmith and Bond (1998) pointed out that replications only took place in collectivist cultures which don't differ from American culture
- FPoor control of variables- when altering variables, Milgram often overlapped them, so it is difficult to identify the cause of any changes in obedience
- GThe obedience alibi- Mandel (1998) argued that these explanations of obedience provide an excuse for evil behaviour
34The agentic state as a socio-psychological factor affecting obedience
Agentic state- this is a [blank_start]mental[blank_end] state in which we feel [blank_start]no personal responsibility[blank_end] for our actions because we believe ourselves to be acting for [blank_start]an authority figure[blank_end] as an agent. Agents experiences [blank_start]high[blank_end] anxiety but feel powerless to disobey, hence following evil leaders like Hitler.- Amental
- Bphysical
- Csocial
- Dno personal responsibility
- Ehigh personal responsibility
- Fan authority figure
- Gthe greater good
- Hpeople without power
- Ihigh
- Jlow
- Kno
35Which state typically allows us to disobey authority figures?
- AThe agentic state
- BThe autonomous state
36The agentic state as a socio-psychological factor affecting obedience
The autonomous state- this is when an individual feels [blank_start]personal responsibility[blank_end] for their actions, and therefore behaves according to [blank_start]their own principles[blank_end].
The agentic shift- this is the shift from [blank_start]autonomy to agency[blank_end], which Milgram suggested occurred when someone perceives someone else as [blank_start]an authority figure[blank_end].- Apersonal responsibility
- Bno personal responsibility
- Ctheir own principles
- Dthe social norms
- Ean authority figure's orders
- Fautonomy to agency
- Gagency to autonomy
- Han authority figure
- Iinferior
37Why do people remain in the agentic state?
- ABinding factors e.g. shifting responsibility to the victim, or denying they were doing any damage
- BThe authority figure won't allow them to disobey
- CThey can't exit the agentic state without first obeying the authority figure
38Legitimacy of authority is a socio-psychological factor for [blank_start]obedience[blank_end] which suggests that, if we perceive someone as having legitimate and higher authority than us, we obey them. Authority is legitimate as a result of a person's position of [blank_start]power[blank_end] in the social hierarchy.
Destructive authority involves [blank_start]legitimate[blank_end] authority figures taking advantage of their position to commit atrocities. For example, Hitler.- Aobedience
- Bconformity
- Clegitimate
- Dillegitimate
- Epower
- Fvulnerability
39Name two advantages of the socio-psychological factors affecting obedience (agentic state and legitimacy of authority)
- AResearch support- Blass and Schmitt (2001) showed students videos from Milgram's study and asked who was responsible for the learner's 'suffering'; the experimenter, teacher, or learner? Most students answered the experimenter given the legitimacy of their authority.
- BLegitimacy of authority explains cultural differences- Kilham and Mann (1974) replicated Milgram's study in Australia and found 16% of pariticipants went to 450V, while Mantell (1971) found 85% of Germans went to 450V. This shows that, in different cultures, authority is more or less likely to be accepted as legitimate
- CThe agentic state also explains why some people don't obey
- DMandel (1998) found that Nazis who were told they had no choice but to shoot people in Poland went ahead with the shooting, supporting the agentic shoot.
40Name two disadvantages of socio-psychological factors affecting obedience (agentic state and legitimacy of authority)
- AContradictory evidence- Blass and Schmitt showed students films from Milgram's study and asked them who was responsible for harming the learner, and the students claimed the teacher was, contradicting the legitimacy of authority theory which would suggest the experimenter was responsible
- BLimited explanation- the agentic shift doesn't explain why some people will disobey. It also suggests Hofling's nurses should feel high anxiety when acting as agents, but they didn't.
- CDoesn't explain cultural differences- legitimacy of authority can't explain why some cultures are more or less likely to obey.
- DThe obedience alibi- Mandel (1998) found that Nazis who had been told that they should shoot Polish civilians but could also be assigned other tasks still carried out the shootings, suggesting the soldiers acted autonomously.
41Which researcher investigated dispositional factors as a factor affecting obedience, and when?
- AAdorno, 1950
- BMilgram, 1963
- CAsch, 1951
- DZimbardo, 1971
42Authoritarian Personality as a factor affecting obedience
Adorno argued that [blank_start]high[blank_end] levels of obedience are actually a [blank_start]psychological[blank_end] disorder due to a person's personality. He used [blank_start]a questionnaire[blank_end] called the F-scale to assess unconscious attitudes to [blank_start]other races[blank_end], which would measure [blank_start]authoritarian[blank_end] personality. He suggested that people with an [blank_start]authoritarian[blank_end] personality were [blank_start]more[blank_end] susceptible to obeying authority figures and were dismissive to 'inferiors'.
People who scored [blank_start]high[blank_end] in the F-scale identified with 'strong' people and were contemptuous of the weak. They were [blank_start]conscious[blank_end] of social status and hierarchy, and believed in rigid stereotypes.- Ahigh
- Blow
- Cpsychological
- Dsocial
- Ea questionnaire
- Fan interview
- Gan observation
- Hother races
- Iobedience
- Jauthoritarian
- Kauthoritative
- Lauthoritarian
- Mauthoritative
- Nmore
- Oless
- Phigh
- Qlow
- Rconscious
- Sdismissive
43Adorno suggested an authoritarian personality developed as a result of [blank_start]harsh parenting[blank_end]; this includes [blank_start]strict[blank_end] discipline, [blank_start]high[blank_end] standards, [blank_start]severe[blank_end] criticism, and [blank_start]conditional[blank_end] love. This creates resentment which is later displaced onto [blank_start]'inferior' people.[blank_end]
- Aharsh parenting
- Babusive relationships
- Crelaxed parenting
- Dmaternal deprivation
- Estrict
- Fminimal
- Ghigh
- Hlow
- Isevere
- Jminimal
- Kconditional
- Lunconditional
- M'inferior' people.
- Nauthority figures.
44Name an advantage of Adorno's theory of dispositional factors affecting obedience
- AResearch support- Milgram conducted interviews with participants who went to the full 450V (were fully obedient) and found they scored highly on the F-scale.
- BCan explain behaviours carried out by a majority, such as Germans in the Second World War displaying anti-semitic behaviour
- CThe F-scale deals both with right-wing authoritarian personality and left-wing authoritarian personality, suggesting it doesn't suffer from political bias
45Name four disadvantages of Adorno's theory of dispositional factors affecting obedience
- AContradictory evidence from Milgram- he conducted interviews with participants who were fully obedient (went to 450V), and found that they scored low on the F-scale, suggesting that they didn't have an authoritarian personality
- BLimited explanation- doesn't explain behaviours carried out by a majority e.g. anti-Semitic views in Nazi Germany
- CPolitical bias- the F-scale only measures the tendency towards extreme right-wing ideology, and doesn't take left-wing authoritarianism into account.
- DPolitical bias- the F-scale only measures the tendency towards extreme left-wing ideology, and doesn't take right-wing authoritarianism into account.
- EMethodological issues- the phrasing of the F-scale was all in the same 'direction'- ticking the same boxes down one side of the page would give you a high score in authoritarianism (acquiescence bias)
- FCan't determine causation- obedience and authoritarianism may be a result of a third factor, such as a low level of education
- GLimited explanation- doesn't explain behaviours carried out by a minority e.g. why only some people are authoritarian
46Social Support
Conformity- if other people are present who don't conform, it is [blank_start]easier[blank_end] to resist conformity. The non-conforming individual is a model, although if they start conforming, so will the observing person.
Obedience- the pressure to obey can be [blank_start]reduced[blank_end] if another person disobeys. Milgram found that adding a dissenting confederate [blank_start]reduced[blank_end] full obedience from [blank_start]65[blank_end]% to 10%.- Aeasier
- Bharder
- Creduced
- Dincreased
- Ereduced
- Fincreased
- G65
- H3
- I35
47Research support for social support as a way of resisting social influence
Allen and Levine (1971) found that conformity [blank_start]decreased[blank_end] when a dissenting confederate was added to an Asch-type study.- Adecreased
- Bincreased
- Cwas unaffected
48Which researcher investigated loci of control as an explanation of resistance to social influence, and when?
- ARotter, 1966
- BMilgram, 1963
- CAsch, 1951
- DAdorno, 1950
49Locus of control
People with an internal locus of control believe that things that happen in their lives are mostly controlled by [blank_start]themselves.[blank_end]
e.g. if they do well in an exam, it is because they [blank_start]worked hard[blank_end]
People with an external locus of control believe that things that happen in their lives are mostly controlled by [blank_start]external forces i.e. luck[blank_end]
e.g. if they do well in an exam, it is because they [blank_start]used a good text book[blank_end]- Athemselves.
- Bexternal forces i.e. luck
- Cworked hard
- Dused a good text book
50Loci of control are not just external or internal, they can also be high or low (e.g. a high internal LOC). What is this scale/sequence called?
- AThe F-scale
- BA continuum
- CThe LOC scale
51Which type of person is most capable of resisting pressures to conform or obey?
- AHigh internal LOC
- BLow internal LOC
- CHigh external LOC
- DLow external LOC
52People with a [blank_start]high internal[blank_end] LOC are most likely to resist social influence. This is because they [blank_start]take personal responsibility[blank_end] for their actions, so base their decisions on [blank_start]their own beliefs[blank_end] while resisting pressures from others. They are typically [blank_start]more[blank_end] self-confident, achievement-oriented, intelligent, and [blank_start]don't require[blank_end] social approval.
- Ahigh internal
- Blow internal
- Chigh external
- Dlow external
- Etake personal responsibility
- Ftake no personal responsibility
- Gtheir own beliefs
- Hother's beliefs
- Imore
- Jless
- Kdon't require
- Lrequire
53Evaluation of LOC as an explanation for resisting social influence
+ Holland (1967) replicated Milgram's baseline study and measured if people were internals or externals. [blank_start]37%[blank_end] of internals didn't continue to the highest shock, compared to [blank_start]23%[blank_end] of externals.
- Twenge (2004) analysed data of American LOC studies and found that although people are [blank_start]more external[blank_end], they are [blank_start]more[blank_end] resistant to obedience. This contradicts Rotter's theory.- A37%
- B23%
- Cmore external
- Dmore
- Eless
- Fmore internal
54Minority Influence
[blank_start]Consistency[blank_end]- the minority should keep the same beliefs over time and between individuals
[blank_start]Commitment[blank_end]- when the minority demonstrates their dedication to their position e.g. personal sacrifices
[blank_start]Flexibility[blank_end]- the minority should adapt their views and accept reasonable counter-arguments- AConsistency
- BCommitment
- CFlexibility
55Which type of conformity does minority influence usually lead to?
- ACompliance
- BIdentification
- CInternalisation
56The snowball effect in [blank_start]minority influence[blank_end]- as more people [blank_start]internalise the[blank_end] beliefs, the rate of conversion [blank_start]increases[blank_end] until the minority view becomes the majority.
- Aminority influence
- Bobedience
- Cconformity to social roles
- Dmajority influence
- Einternalise the
- Fcomply with the
- Gidentify with the
- Hincreases
- Idecreases
57Which researcher investigated minority influence, and when?
- AMoscovici, 1969
- BMilgram, 1963
- CAsch, 1951
- DZimbardo, 1971
58Moscovici, 1969, asked a group of [blank_start]6[blank_end] people to view a set of 36 blue-coloured slides that varied in intensity and state if they were green or blue. There were [blank_start]2[blank_end] confederates who consistently said green on 2/3 of the slides. The participants gave the same wrong answer on [blank_start]8[blank_end]% of the trials, with [blank_start]32[blank_end]% giving the same wrong answer on at least one trial. A second group was exposed to an inconsistent minority and agreement fell to 1.25%. A control group with no confederates gave the wrong answer on [blank_start]0.25[blank_end]% of trials.
- A6
- B123
- C40
- D3
- E2
- F3
- G5
- H12
- I8
- J1
- K10
- L50
- M32
- N48
- O75
- P23
- Q0.25
- R0
- S10
- T3
59Name two advantages of minority influence
- AResearch support for consistency- Moscovici showed that a consistent minority's opinion is more effective than an inconsistent minority.
- BMundane realism- Moscovici's task had good mundane realism, meaning that it had significance to the participants
- CResearch support for internalisation- in a variation of Moscovici's study, participants wrote their answers. Private agreement with the minority was higher, suggesting the participants internalised the beliefs.
- DGood real life application- studies take into account the influence of power and status, as well as the hostility faced by minorities.
60Name two disadvantages of minority influence
- AContradictory research- Moscovici's research suggested inconsistency in a minority was more effective than consistency, contradicting the claim that minority influence needs to be consistent
- BArtificial tasks- Moscovici's research involved participants naming the colour that 36 slides were, which has little real life relevance or significance, meaning it lacks external validity
- CContradictory research- a variation of Moscovici's study involved participants writing down their answers. Often participants outwardly agreed with the minority, but privately disagreed- they wrote different answers to the minority even if they vocally agreed. This compliance contradicts the theory that minority influence leads to internalisation.
- DLimited application- in the real world, the majority usually has higher status and power, and the minority influence faces hostility. This commitment isn't replicated in studies.
61Label the bottom table with the correct numbers (reasons for social change) and letters (explanation), as are found in the top table.
- AB
- B3
- CC
62Name an advantage of social change research
- AResearch support for role of NSI in social change- Nolan hung signs on residents' doors which either said that most residents were trying to reduce their energy usage, or just that they should save energy. There was a significant decrease in energy usage of those who received the NSI message compared to those who didn't.
- BMinority influence is directly effective- minority influence often has a very immediate effect and the majority is influenced on the issue itself.
- CSupporting evidence from Asch, Milgram and Moscovici is methodologically correct, with minimal issues
63Name three disadvantages of social change research
- AMinority influence is indirectly effective- it is often delayed by years, if not decades, and the majority is only influenced on matters related to the issue, not the issue itself
- BContradictory evidence- Nolan hung signs up on residents' doors with one of two messages; either that most residents were trying to reduce energy usage, or to save energy. Nolan found residents who received the first message (NSI) didn't reduce their energy usage, while those who received the second message did reduce their usage.
- CContradictory research- Moscovici suggested majority infleunce led to conformity while minority influence led to internalisation, however Mackie argued that when a majority believes differently to you, you have to think long and hard about their reasoning.
- DMethodological issues- Asch, Milgram and Moscovici's research all included methodological issues which hindered the validity and generalisability
Información
- Descripción
- INCOMPLETE **This resource is an amended version of the other Social Influence quiz- it contains the same information, but in a more accessible format** AQA Psychology Social Influence quiz for AS. Covers all topics in the AQA Psychology textbook, including researchers, evaluations and theories. Made for my own benefit, so not all questions will help you out, but feel free to use.
- Autor
- Grace Fawcitt
- Idioma
- English
- Visitas
- 1.169
- Etiquetas
- Valoración
- 4,5 de 5 · 4 valoraciones Valora este test