[blank_start]London & NE Railway Co. v Berriman[blank_end] is an example of the literal rule causing an injustice.

London & NE Railway Co. v Berriman

Test

Sin título

Helen Martin 4 preguntas

Hacer el test

Este test tiene tipos de pregunta que se abren en el reproductor de siempre.

1R v Harris is an example of the use of the [blank_start]literal rule[blank_end].
1. Aliteral rule
2. Bgolden rule
3. Cmischief rule
4. Dpurposive approach
2[blank_start]London & NE Railway Co. v Berriman[blank_end] is an example of the literal rule causing an injustice.
1. ALondon & NE Railway Co. v Berriman
2. BWhiteley v Chappell
3. CAdler v George
4. DRe Sigsworth Bedford v Bedford
3The [blank_start]golden rule[blank_end] allows the court to depart from the literal rule when its application would produce an absurd, illogical or repugnant result.
1. Agolden rule
2. Bmischief rule
3. Cpurposive approach
4Adler v George is an example of the use of the golden rule to avoid an absurd result from the literal rule.
1. AVerdadero
2. BFalso

Descripción: Law Test sobre Sin título, creado por Helen Martin el 04/10/2016.
Autor: Helen Martin
Idioma: English
Visitas: 1
Etiquetas: law
Valoración: Aún sin valoraciones
Valora este test
Valora este test