¡GoConqr estrena diseño! Cuéntanos qué te parece.

Regístrate gratis

Test

Qualitative guidelines

Róisín Farmer 16 preguntas

Hacer el test

Este test tiene tipos de pregunta que se abren en el reproductor de siempre.

Preguntas del test (16)

  1. 1According to Yardley (2000), commitment and rigour involves: (4)
    1. AImmersion in data
    2. BIn-depth engagement with topic
    3. CMethodological competence
    4. DThorough data collection
    5. EClarity and power of argument
    6. FFit between theory and method
  2. 2Transparency and coherence involves: (4)
    1. AClarity and power of arguments
    2. BTransparent methods and data presentation
    3. CFit between theory and method
    4. DReflexivity
    5. EImmersion in data
    6. FSocio-cultural importance
  3. 3Impact and importance involves [blank_start]theoretical[blank_end] importance, involving enriching understanding, [blank_start]socio-cultural[blank_end] importance, meaning to change society, and [blank_start]practice[blank_end] importance, for example to inform policy
    1. Atheoretical
    2. Bsocio-cultural
    3. Cpractice
  4. 4According to Lincoln & Guba (1989), how can a researcher establish trustworthiness? (4)
    1. ACredibility
    2. BTransferability
    3. CDependability
    4. DConfirmability
    5. ETriangulation
    6. FMember checking
  5. 5According to Lincoln & Guba (1989), how can credibility be achieved: (6)
    1. APersistent engagement and observation
    2. BTriangulation
    3. CPeer debriefing
    4. DNegative case analysis
    5. EReferential adequacy
    6. FMember checking
    7. GTransferability
    8. HDependability
  6. 6Triangulation involves:
    1. AGetting more than 1 person to code data etc.
    2. BGetting peer reviewed
    3. CAcknowledging information that doesn't fit the theory
    4. DChecking data and analysis with participants
  7. 7Peer debriefing is basically the same as peer review
    1. AVerdadero
    2. BFalso
  8. 8Acknowledging information that doesn't fit with the theory is known as:
    1. ANegative case analysis
    2. BReferential adequacy
    3. CMember checking
    4. DTriangulation
  9. 9Go back to the raw data to compare to preliminary findings to ensure nothing was missed is known as:
    1. AReferential adequacy
    2. BNegative case analysis
    3. CMember checking
    4. DTransferability
  10. 10Member checking, a method of gaining credibility, involves:
    1. AChecking data and analysis with participants
    2. BGoing back to raw data to compare to preliminary findings to ensure nothing was missed
    3. CAcknowledging information that doesn't fit with the theory
    4. DPeer debriefing

Información

Descripción
RDA2 - Qualitative Test sobre Qualitative guidelines, creado por Róisín Farmer el 03/05/2017.
Idioma
English
Visitas
0
Valoración
Aún sin valoraciones
Valora este test
Valora este test

Escríbenos

¿Sobre qué es tu mensaje?

¿Qué te parece el nuevo diseño?

¿Te gusta?