GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Flashcards

Speech Perception

Eleni Blakemore Language, Communication and Thought (PS3022) English 30 cards

Cards in this deck (30)

  1. 1What are the challenges of speech perception?- Distributed in time
    - Variable
    - Fuzzy
    - Not segmented
  2. 2Speech is variable across different talkers...Physiology, accent, dynamics, speaking style and rate
  3. 3SpectrogramA way to visualise speech by showing wave form information of amplitude and frequency
  4. 4FormantResonances in the vocal tract
  5. 5Speech is variable across different words...- Phenomenon of coarticulation: sounds run
    - Formant transitions: sweep
    - Place assimilation: smark card
  6. 6Speech is variable within the same talkerLittle words in different contexts
  7. 7What are the two challenges?1: Lack of invariance problem
    2: Segmentation problem
  8. 8Davis et al. (2005)Perceptual pop out: undegraded first
  9. 9Ganong (1980)Ganong effect: lexical context allows us to hear synthetic and ambiguous phonemes as a real word
  10. 10Warren & Warren (1970)Phoneme restoration effect: unaware of meaningless sound
  11. 11Kalikow et al. (1977)Presented listeners with sentences with background noise
    Either HP or LP
    HP - recognise word more easily
  12. 12Sumby & Pollack (1954)Hearing individuals also make use of lip reading cues esp in noisy environments
  13. 13McGurk & MacDonald (1976)See 'ga', hear 'ba' brain interprets as da
  14. 14Saffran et al. (1996)8mo
    bidakupagotigolabubidaku
    probable word boundaries
    Infants attended more to 'words' than nonword
  15. 15Cutler & Butterfield (1992)Stress on 2nd syllable
    'Conduct ascends uphill'
    Took position of stress as start of words
    'The doctor sends the bill'
  16. 16Douxpoux et al. (1997)French is a fixed stress language
    Not sensitive to lexical-stress information
  17. 17Broca (1861)Speech production: inferior frontal gyrus - left hemisphere
  18. 18Wernicke (1874)Speech perception: superior temporal gyrus in left hemisphere
  19. 19Broca (1865)Deficits to right hemisphere did not lead to similar speech production problems seen in LeBorgne - tan
  20. 20What speech features are seen in Broca's aphasia?- Effortful speech
    - Telegraphic: 'give water' 'boy falls'
    - Agrammatic: lacks function words, connecting words
  21. 21Carmazza & Zurif (1976)Difficult to understand reversible sentences
    The girl pushed the woman
    The girl was pushed by the woman
  22. 22What are the speech features of Wernicke's aphasia?- Speech is fluent
    - Semantically empty
    -Like jargon
    - Poor speech comprehension
    - Not specific to auditory speech e.g. sign language
    - Amodal comprehension/semantic deficit?
  23. 23What is the problem with taking a syndromic approach to these disorders?- Dependent on accidents: highly variable
    - Strokes follow vascular not functional anatomy
    - Affects white matter too - links brain regions
    - Different brain damage leads to different severity of damage
  24. 24What does the neuroimaging of health brains allow?- Allows study of function in intact brain
    - Anatomical tool
    - BOLD level = DV
    - Investigation of functional-anatomical networks in the brain
  25. 25Functional MRIDifference in activation between 2 brain states at a certain statistical threshold
    Oxygenated and deoxygenated blood have different paramagnetic properties
    Speaking > rest
  26. 26Wise et al. (1991)Listening to pseudo words activated both hemispheres
    What is rest?
  27. 27Scott et al. (2000)Speech perception and PET
    Varying intelligibility
    Speech, Vco, RSp, RVCo
    Understanding = Sp + VCo
    Not = RSp + RVCo
    Left anterior STS
    RH = dynamic pitch (Sp + RSp)
  28. 28Scott (2005)Found parallels with non-human primates
  29. 29Calvert et al. (2000)Visual information using fMRI
    A, V, A+V, AV congruent, AV congruent
    - Left posterior superior temporal sulcus exhibited significant supra-additive response (A+V C)
    - Not specific to speech
  30. 30Obleser et al. (2007)Sentence predictability on processing of degraded speech
    Altered semantic predictability and noise vocoding intelligibility
    - HP = greatest comprehension when high degradation
    - Bottom up effects: increased signal with an increase in sentence intelligibility
    - Left lateralised responses to increased predictability
    - Higher order cortical area facilitated
    : PCG, L angular gyrus, medial and L lateral PFC
    - Wide range of brain regions

Information

Description
Language, Communication and Thought (PS3022) Flashcards on Speech Perception, created by Eleni Blakemore on 15/05/2017.
Created by
Eleni Blakemore
Views
2
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?