A level US Politics - 3C ((1) Election and Voting - Presidential elections) Mind Map on (5) PAC's (Political Action Committees), created by Marcus Danvers on 09/15/2014.
PACs can give $5,000 to a candidate committee
per election (primary, general or special)
They can also give up to $15,000 annually to any national
party committee, and $5,000 annually to any other PAC
PACs may receive up to $5,000 from any one
individual, PAC or committee per calendar year
A PAC must register with the FEC within 10 days of its formation, providing name
and address of the PAC, its treasurer and any connected organisations
PACs were first introduced in 1944. This was to avoid using
funds from corporation or union treasuries (which is illegal)
PACs must disclose their donors and donations monthly and quarterly
Super PACs cannot donate to a candidate or
party but can spend on actions that are directly
coordinated by candidates or political parties
A new type of PAC was created after the U.S Court
of Appeals decision in Speechnow v. FEC in 2010
Before this time - PACs had strict regulations on spending and receiving
money. "Soft-money" (i.e. spending on advertising not directly linked to a
party or candidate) was prohibited (2002 campaign led by John McCain)
These PACs make no contributions to candidates or parties.
They do, however make independent expenditures in federal races -
running ads or sending mail or communicating in other ways with messages
that specifically advocate the election or defeat of a specific candidate.
There are no limits or restrictions on the sources of
funds that may be used for these expenditures
Like "normal" PACs they must disclose their donors and donations monthly and quarterly
From the Court decision to Dec 32st 2011 super PACs raised $96 mil
During the 2012 election super PACs spent $547 mil, of which
78% was spent opposing candidate. Significantly more was
spent on opposing Obama's candidacy than Mitt Romney's
Leadership - PACs
These PACs are when a candidate contributes some of their campaign funding to
another candidate. The same regulations on spending and receiving donations apply
However, Leadership-PACs do not need to disclose their donations
Can be used to further political careers - undemocratic
Foreign-connected PACs
These are PACs formed by American divisions of corporations. It is illegal for
non-citizens to donate to campaign funding. However, American citizens
working in American divisions of corporations can donate and set-up PACs
Foreign-Connected PACs have the same
regulations as "normal" or "Super" PACs
E.g. BAE (a British owned company)
contributed nearly $200 k to PACs this quarter
Advantages of PACs
Removes "shadowy money" seen in Nixon administration
Makes it easier for citizens to become politically active
and aware - they can donate their place of work for e.g.
Disadvantages of PACs
Can make elections hugely expensive - Super PACs mean an
unlimited amoute of money can be raised and spent on candidates.
Super PAC contributions come from largely wealthy individuals as opposed to
organisations come from largely wealthy individuals as opposed to organisations or the
electorate as a whole (73.8% from individuals vs. 4.6% from unions).
Foreign-Connected, Leadership and Super PACs all contribute to the idea that
if you have money you can influence electoral process - is this undemocratic?
Super PACs make it harder to track and trace
donations - the return of shadow money?