153736
Description
Mind Map by val.corbett, updated more than 1 year ago
|
Created by val.corbett
almost 11 years ago
|
|
The Standard of Care
- Objective Test - Reasonable Man
- Vaughan v Menlove [1837] - personal best not
good enough if it does not meet the reasonable
standard
- Mansfield v Weetabix [1998] and Counihan v
Bus Atha Cliath [2005] - medical condition may
affect standard
- Roe v Minister for Health [1954] - standard not examined with
benefit of hindsight
- Probability of the Harm
- The greater the likelihood of the risk - the more that must be done
- O'Gorman v Ritz Clonmel Ltd [1972]
- Rodgers v JACKS Taverns Ltd [2012]
- Bolton v Stone [1951]
- O'Gorman v Ritz Clonmel Ltd [1972]
- The greater the likelihood of the risk - the more that must be done
- Gravity of the Harm
- Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951]
- Vowles v Evans [2002]
- Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951]
- Social Utility
- Hayes v Min for
Finance [2007]
- Hayes v Min for
Finance [2007]
- Cost of Prevention
- O'Gorman v Ritz Clonmel Ltd [1972]
- Latimer v AEC Ltd
[1953]
- O'Gorman v Ritz Clonmel Ltd [1972]
Want to create your own Mind Maps for free with GoConqr? Learn more.