Mind map
Criminal Litigation SGS1

Mind map: Criminal litigation SGS1
Map content
Criminal Litigation SGS1
Conduct question
- Acting for more than one client
- I= Potential conflict of interest between two clients past or present
- P= 1, 2, 4, 6
- O= 3.5, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, 5.2
- Discuss
- Ask before if there could be a conflict
- Know something about one client which could effect a new one- Must disclose to new client, O 4.2 but would need olds permission O4.1
- Cannot act for new due to conflict of interest IB 3.2 & P4
- In public funded cases one solicitor should act for all defendants unless their is a conflict of interest
- One client may wish to implicated another= Conflict LSPNCI 2.1
- If one client wishes to say they were scared/influenced by another= Conflict LSPNCI 2.3.2
- Cannot act for both= IB 3.2 + P4
- Have to withdraw from one & tell other to find other representation
- Cannot act for both= IB 3.2 + P4
- If one client wishes to say they were scared/influenced by another= Conflict LSPNCI 2.3.2
- One client may wish to implicated another= Conflict LSPNCI 2.1
- In public funded cases one solicitor should act for all defendants unless their is a conflict of interest
- Cannot act for new due to conflict of interest IB 3.2 & P4
- Know something about one client which could effect a new one- Must disclose to new client, O 4.2 but would need olds permission O4.1
- Ask before if there could be a conflict
- Discuss
- O= 3.5, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, 5.2
- P= 1, 2, 4, 6
- I= Potential conflict of interest between two clients past or present
- Potentially misleading the court
- I= If clients instructions would mean you would mislead the court + Any other potential issues
- P= 1, 2, 4, 6
- O= 5.1, 5.2, 4.1
- Discuss
- C has indicated he will mislead the court by ...
- I know this to be untrue so it would not be meeting outcomes...
- It would be against IB...
- Could be in their best interest P2 but conflicts with P1= The one which serves the public interest
- If client continues, I cannot continue to act for him as it is a breach of principles ...
- Client can put the prosecution to proof as in para 4.5.2 LSPNCrPR
- Client to say silent
- Maybe in his best interest to be silent if evidence is weak-P4
- Both must remain silent on the issue, if asked a direct question, take instructions and see if client will let you disclose, if not have to withdrawal
- Maybe in his best interest to be silent if evidence is weak-P4
- Client to say silent
- Client can put the prosecution to proof as in para 4.5.2 LSPNCrPR
- If client continues, I cannot continue to act for him as it is a breach of principles ...
- Could be in their best interest P2 but conflicts with P1= The one which serves the public interest
- It would be against IB...
- I know this to be untrue so it would not be meeting outcomes...
- C has indicated he will mislead the court by ...
- Discuss
- O= 5.1, 5.2, 4.1
- P= 1, 2, 4, 6
- I= If clients instructions would mean you would mislead the court + Any other potential issues
- Having to withdrawal
- If I did with drawl I would have to maintain the duty of confidentiality under O4.1
- Court cannot pressure you to disclose- Professional reasons- LSPNCrPR 5.1
- If I did with drawl I would have to maintain the duty of confidentiality under O4.1
- Acting for more than one client
Issue
Principles
Outcomes
Discuss what we can do
Funding
- Means test
- Under 18 or on unemployment benefits= Automatic
- Demonstares your income/capital is lower than threshold
- Under 18 or on unemployment benefits= Automatic
- Merits test
- In the interest of justice
- Imprisonable offence or in custody= Duty solicitor(one off)
- Private solicitor
- Imprisonable offence or in custody= Duty solicitor(one off)
- In the interest of justice
- Means test
Information
- Description
- LPC LPC Criminal Litigation Mind Map on Criminal Litigation SGS1, created by Peyton Matthews-Hewer on 04/10/2018.
- Created by
- Peyton Matthews-Hewer
- Views
- 7
- Rating