Judicial Review

Daustina
Mind Map by Daustina, updated more than 1 year ago
Daustina
Created by Daustina almost 5 years ago
63
1

Description

Process of Judicial Review.
Tags

Resource summary

Judicial Review
1 Permission stage
1.1 Public Body/ Authority
1.1.1 HRA s6
1.1.2 Function,Funding,Establisnment (Statute?)
1.2 D/O/A
1.3 Time Limit-3mnths
1.4 Public Law Matter
1.5 Prima Facie Case
1.6 STANDING
1.6.1 INDIVIDUAL
1.6.1.1 HRA s7= v/p.v.test
1.6.1.2 Senior Courts Act= S.I. Test
1.6.2 Satndard JR
1.6.3 3rd party intervener/friend of the courts: up to the courts to accept info
1.6.4 Claimant
1.6.4.1 Group
1.7 Exhausted Appeals
2 Grounds
2.1 llegality
2.1.1 Traditional
2.1.1.1 Error of Law
2.1.1.2 Error of Precedent Fact
2.1.1.3 Irrational Conclusion as to fact
2.1.1.4 Power for improper purpose
2.1.1.5 Duty as opposed to discretion (could be error of law)
2.1.1.6 Unlawful Delelgation of Power/ Dictaion
2.1.1.7 Fettering of Discretion
2.1.1.8 Failure to take into acount relevant considerations
2.1.2 HRA/ECHR
2.1.2.1 Breach of HRA
2.1.2.2 Pub Auth act in a way that complies with ECHR right unless Parl. via Prim. Leg. authorises or requires Pub. Auth. to act in a way that is incompatible with ECHR
2.1.2.3 Right? been complied with? any restrictions?
2.1.2.4 Lack of compliance been authorised by statue? YES= decision not unlawful NO= decision not lawful Uk law incompatible with ECHR
2.2 Unreasonableness/ Irrationality
2.2.1 Wednesbury test
2.2.2 Refined in CCSU/ GCSU by Lord Diplock to Irrationality
2.2.3 overlap with other grounds of review
2.2.4 Proportionality in context of ECHR
2.3 Procedural impropriety
2.3.1 Breach of
2.3.1.1 Stat. duty
2.3.1.1.1 Mandatory
2.3.1.1.2 Directory
2.3.1.2 Rules of natural justice (common/ case law)
2.3.1.2.1 Right to
2.3.1.2.1.1 Know case against you
2.3.1.2.1.2 a D-maker free from bias(or the appearance of )
2.3.1.2.1.3 to be heard
2.3.1.2.1.4 Cicumstancial
2.3.1.2.1.4.1 to be or to cross examine
2.3.1.2.1.4.2 to be represented
2.3.1.2.1.4.3 knowreasons related to decision
2.3.1.2.2 Disappointment of legitimate expectation
2.3.1.2.2.1 Procedure- common practise
2.3.1.2.2.2 Substantive Benefit- like estoppel I private law
2.3.1.2.2.2.1 detrimental reliance
2.3.1.2.2.2.2 only place where you can get what you wanted in the 1st place
3 Remedies
3.1 Old
3.1.1 Quashing order
3.1.2 Prohibiting order
3.1.3 Mandatory order
3.2 New
3.2.1 Injunctions
3.2.2 Declaration
3.2.3 Dec. of incompatibility
3.2.4 S8-Compensation Discretionary
3.3 Current Reforms
3.3.1 Criminal Justice & Courts Act 2015
3.3.1.1 Sec 84 can refuse remedy if outcome wouldn't have been substantially different
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

Judicial Review
Bre McDonald
Judicial Review
amylee94
Public law
Sebss
Judicial Review
Jack McEvoy
The Judicial Branch
Za'Mary's Tatum
Grounds for Judicial Review - Illegality
Chantal Briancon
Judicial review
Sebss
Grounds for Judicial Review - Procedural Impropriety
Chantal Briancon
Procedural Hurdles of Judicial Review
Chantal Briancon
Classifications of Law
Renee van den Broek
Case Law
chloe.crismani