Mind map
Evans and Lyon (2012)
Map content
Evans and Lyon (2012)
Assessing children's competency to Take the Oath in Court
- Judges virtually never found children incompetent to testify
- Attorneys rarely asked hypothetical Q's in a way found to facilitate performance.
- Defence attorneys used a higher proportion of more difficult Q types than prosecutors
Examined children's accuracy in response to T/L competency questions
- Participants
- 164 from criminal child sex abuse cases over 5 years
- 154 quoted in U.S state and federal appelate cases over 35 yrs.
- Results
- T/L competency is underestimated by courtroom Q'ing
- Supports doubts about the utility of the competency requirements
- T/L competency is underestimated by courtroom Q'ing
- Children exhibited variability in performance based on question type
- Definition questions - meaning of T&L hardest - Errors in response to 'Do you know' Q's
- Q's about consequences of lying harder than Q's evaluating morality or lying.
- High rates of error to Q's about whether they had ever told a lie.
- Participants
Information
- Description
- Degree Seen Question Mind Map on Evans and Lyon (2012), created by maggie on 01/10/2013.
- Created by
- maggie
- Views
- 51
- Tags
- Rating