28537804
Description
Mind Map by Catrina Dunbar, updated more than 1 year ago
|
|
Created by Catrina Dunbar
about 3 years ago
|
|
Due Process Amendments
- Fourth Amendment - Unreasonable searches
and seizures Warrants
- 1967: Katz v. United States - User of a public phone
booth had a invasion of privacy, the police needed a
search warrant to listen.
- 1968: Terry v. Ohio - Used illegally obtained
against the defendant
- 1973: Schneckloth V. Bustamonte - Consent given to search
car at traffic stop, unaware of his right to refuse.
- 1973: Schneckloth V. Bustamonte - Consent given to search
car at traffic stop, unaware of his right to refuse.
- 1968: Terry v. Ohio - Used illegally obtained
against the defendant
- 1967: Katz v. United States - User of a public phone
booth had a invasion of privacy, the police needed a
search warrant to listen.
- Fifth Amendment - Prohibition against double jeopardy,
right against self incrimination.
- 1932: Blockburger v. United States- Court held double
jeopardy, but broke 2 laws so can be charged seperately
- 1944: Ashcraft v. Tennessee- Officers broke down a suspect for
38 hours in interegation and convinced him to sign a
confession.
- 1966: Miranda v. Arizona - Individual didn't know his rights. This led
to the Miranda rule which when arrested you are read your right
which is now universal.
- 1966: Miranda v. Arizona - Individual didn't know his rights. This led
to the Miranda rule which when arrested you are read your right
which is now universal.
- 1944: Ashcraft v. Tennessee- Officers broke down a suspect for
38 hours in interegation and convinced him to sign a
confession.
- 1932: Blockburger v. United States- Court held double
jeopardy, but broke 2 laws so can be charged seperately
- Sixth Amendment - Accused has a right to a speedy and public trial, right to an
attorney
- 1932: Powell v. Alabama - Young boys convicted for raping 2
girls, case was thrown out because they were not able to get an
attorney during there trial.
- 1938: Johnson v. Zerbst - 2 marines convicted
of having counterfeit money, case was thrown
out because the didn't have attorneys for
trial.
- 1973: Strunk v. United States - Courts denied
his motion to a speedy trial for automobile
theft case.
- 1973: Strunk v. United States - Courts denied
his motion to a speedy trial for automobile
theft case.
- 1938: Johnson v. Zerbst - 2 marines convicted
of having counterfeit money, case was thrown
out because the didn't have attorneys for
trial.
- 1932: Powell v. Alabama - Young boys convicted for raping 2
girls, case was thrown out because they were not able to get an
attorney during there trial.
- Eight Amendment - Excessive bail, Excessive fines, Cruel and unusual
punishment
- 1972: Furman v. Georgia - He was sentenced to death for shooting and woman while robbing her home,
Furman argued the death was accidental and the harsh punishment was because he was black.
- 1987: United States v. Salerno - Fought that the state exaggerated his danger to community in denying
him bail. But he was still denied bail.
- 1910: Weems v. United States - Weems was treated with cruelty and punishment, chained by ankle
or wrist given a very high sentence AND hard labor, his attorney fought and got the court to agree.
- 1910: Weems v. United States - Weems was treated with cruelty and punishment, chained by ankle
or wrist given a very high sentence AND hard labor, his attorney fought and got the court to agree.
- 1987: United States v. Salerno - Fought that the state exaggerated his danger to community in denying
him bail. But he was still denied bail.
- 1972: Furman v. Georgia - He was sentenced to death for shooting and woman while robbing her home,
Furman argued the death was accidental and the harsh punishment was because he was black.
- Fourteenth Amendment - National citizenship and forbidding
the states to restrict the basic rights of citizens.
- 1961: Mapp v. Ohio - Mapp used her 14th amendment to get possesed
evidence thrown out of her trial because she had the right to possess it.
- 1963: Gideon v, Wainwright - He had to defend himself in trial because he was
denied an attorney, so he fought it and then the courts did not grant him
anything.
- 1978; University of Cal v. Bakke - Denied from UOC because of his color, fought in court
it was against the 14th amendment use of racial quotas.
- 1978; University of Cal v. Bakke - Denied from UOC because of his color, fought in court
it was against the 14th amendment use of racial quotas.
- 1963: Gideon v, Wainwright - He had to defend himself in trial because he was
denied an attorney, so he fought it and then the courts did not grant him
anything.
- 1961: Mapp v. Ohio - Mapp used her 14th amendment to get possesed
evidence thrown out of her trial because she had the right to possess it.
Want to create your own Mind Maps for free with GoConqr? Learn more.