Please wait - loading…

But for test

Description

But for test plan
joti Zandu
Mind Map by joti Zandu, updated more than 1 year ago
joti Zandu
Created by joti Zandu over 6 years ago
19
0

Resource summary

But for test
  1. Introduction (250w)
    1. Brief overview of topic
      1. The 'but for' test (Definition
        1. Within this essay i will highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the 'but for' test....
          1. Barnett v Kensington & Chelsea Management Committee (1969)
          2. Paragraph one (300w)
            1. Strength
              1. cases
                1. McGee v National Coal Board [1973]
                2. Common Sense
                  1. Eggshell skulls - 'The tortfeasor must take his victim as he finds him' Read more at Law Teacher - pg 271 Horsey
                3. Weakness
                  1. Cases
                    1. Mc Williams v Sir William Arrol (1962)
                    2. Involves an element of guess work
                    3. Conclusion
                      1. Journal
                        1. Statute
                        2. Paragraph two (300w)
                          1. Strength
                            1. cases
                              1. - Fairchild v Glenhaven [2002] - Wilsher v Essex AHA [1988] - Bolitho v City & Hackney Health Authority [1997] - Nyang v G4S Care & Justice Services Ltd & Ors [2013]
                                1. HOWEVER: Compensation Act 2006 - Holtby - Pg 255 Horsey
                                2. Established on a balance of probabilities
                                  1. HOWEVER: Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw - "He did not have to demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the guilty dust was the sole cause of the disease." Material Contribution to harm
                                3. Conclusion
                                  1. Weakness
                                    1. Cases
                                      1. Hotson v East Berkshire Area Health Authority [1987] Gregg v Scott (2005) - see baroness Hale’s explanation - pg 263 Horsey
                                      2. Indeterminate causes (more than one cause) / loss of chance
                                        1. HENCE WHY (LINK BACK): Barnett v Kensington & Chelsea Management Committee [1969] - The hospital was not liable as the doctor's failure to examine the patient did not cause his death. Introduced the 'but for' test ie would the result have occurred but for the act or omission of the defendant? If yes, the defendant is not liable. Cook v Lewis
                                          1. Lord Reid “A man us not compensated for the physical injury he is compensated for the loss which he suffers as a result of that injury.” Read more at Law Teacher:
                                          2. Sindell v Abbot Laboratories [1980] - pg 260 Horsey
                                        2. Journal
                                          1. Statute
                                          2. Paragraph three (300w)
                                            1. Strength
                                              1. Cases
                                              2. Conclusion
                                                1. Weakness
                                                  1. Cases
                                                    1. Bolitho Wright v Cambridge Medical Group (2011) - pg 265 Horsey
                                                    2. Omissions
                                                    3. Journal
                                                      1. Statute
                                                      2. Conclusion (250w)
                                                        1. In my submission/ I submit that.... with support from legal authority
                                                          1. Tie up arguments
                                                            1. what affect does it have on the law, on future cases
                                                              1. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] - Pg 259 Horsey
                                                            Show full summary Hide full summary

                                                            Similar

                                                            Contract Law
                                                            sherhui94
                                                            How Parliament Makes Laws
                                                            harryloftus505
                                                            A-Level Law: Theft
                                                            amyclare96
                                                            AQA AS LAW, Unit 1, Section A, Parliamentary Law Making 1/3
                                                            Nerdbot98
                                                            A2 Law: Cases - Defence of Insanity
                                                            Jessica 'JessieB
                                                            Law Commission 1965
                                                            ria rachel
                                                            The Criminal Courts
                                                            thornamelia
                                                            A2 Law: Special Study - Robbery
                                                            Jessica 'JessieB
                                                            Omissions
                                                            ameliathorn0325
                                                            AS Law Jury Case Quiz
                                                            Fionnghuala Malone
                                                            Criminal Law
                                                            jesusreyes88