Mind map
Admissability
Map content
Admissability
Hearsay
- Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995
- s259(1)
- Can be used in document/Oral form
- s259(2)
- (a) Dead or unfit
- (b) not in the UK
- ( c) not found
- (d) refuses to give oral evidence
- s260
- Prior statements can be used
- In a document
- signed
- Prior statements can be used
- s259(1)
- Police Records
- Muldoon v Herron
- overrode non identification in court
- Jamieson v HMA
- Substituted oral evidence
- Muldoon v Herron
- Atmostphere
- McLaren v McLeod
- Brothel case
- McLaren v McLeod
- Res Gestae Statements
- Ratten v R
- Telephone murder case
- Cinci v HMA
- Shower Rape case
- De Recenti statement
- Ratten v R
- Computer Prinouts
- Lord Advocates Reference
- Senior official can ratify
- Lord Advocates Reference
- Self Serving/Mixed Statements
- Perrie v HMA
- Accused is party to the proceedings
- Codona v HMA
- Bully boy tactics
- McIntyre v HMA
- Racial Harrasment Phonecalls
- Recording of Interview
- Perrie v HMA
- Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995
Judicial knowledge
- Donaldson v Valentine
- 'M' means Motorway
- Kennedy v Smith and Ansvar
- Cannot assume 11/2 Pints makes someone drunk
- Donaldson v Valentine
Opinions
- Stewart v Glasgow
- Clothes Pole Case
- Stewart v Glasgow
Character Evidence
- C v M
- Slander case
- Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995
- s101
- Previous Convictions
- s101
- Sinclair v HMA
- Media Atenntion
- Gallaher v Paton
- Shop Fraud
- C v M
Improper Obtaining
- Stumbling and Fishing
- Car searches
- Baxter v Scott
- Protocol
- Graham v Orr
- Suspition
- Baxter v Scott
- Bugging
- Jamieson v Annan
- Accidental
- HMA v Higgins
- Purposeful
- HMA v Cambell
- Newspaper
- Jamieson v Annan
- McAvoy v Jessop
- Bedsit Case
- Weir v Jessop
- Undercover Case
- Car searches
- Brown v Glen
- Consent
- Lawrie v Muir
- Improper Phrasing
- Namsyslak v HMA
- Fingerprinting
- Exception
- Webley v Ritchie
- Urgency
- Webley v Ritchie
- Stumbling and Fishing