Notes
Article Q. Things to Highlight
Content of the notes (1)
Page 1
Read Qs
before article
After
every few paragraphs – quick note next to it to say what it shows (summary points)
Highlight/underline
any info. Relating to:
Economical
Ethical (e.x. paid
volunteers i.e. pay people for trials)
Social (benefits/harm to
society)
Environmental
When looking at data, ask "what is the data telling me? what is it NOT telling me?"
e.x. Explicitly telling me:
- Source A does not support the statement as it does not provide evidence for religious groups
- Source B looks at only one type of religious group
- Data comparisons (there is no/little di.f between values provided in both Source A and Source B; there is no/little dif. in values of Source A; there is no/little dif. in values of Source B)
e.x. NOT (explicitly) telling me:
- Non-Catholics can also be other religious groups
- Sample size -> unknown reliability
Another way in which bibliography could be completed:
1. look @ any missing references not present in biblio. -> add missing references from text/material used
2. if none ->
Reference to book /
website / address / url
Date
Wikipedia article url / address / title of
article
Date site visites
External sources e.x. Leaflet
Date
Title of newspaper / journal with
household questionnaire
Some detail included, date, institution(s),
author(s) add URL of data (e.g. economic reference)
Implications: both advantages and disadvantages
Information
- Description
- AS Biology UNIT 3 Note on Article Q. Things to Highlight, created by marianne.salib on 05/05/2015.
- Created by
- marianne.salib
- Views
- 0
- Rating