Mapa mental
Utilitarianism

Conteúdo do mapa
Utilitarianism
Bentham
- Utility
- Based on result: Most useful end is the one which brings the most happiness and pleasure
- Assessing which act is best: 'The greatest happiness principle
- Not necessarily the most people just the most happines
- Seen as the originator
- Barrister
- Sovereign good
- Supreme ethical value
- Motivated by pleasure and avoid pain
- Earlier theory (opposite)..
- HEDONISM
- Only right is pleasure
- Teleological?
- One Underlying rule
- 1 guiding principle
- Principle of utility
- The Hedonic calculus
- Intensity (In)
- How strong/instant pleasure
- Duration (Durham)
- How long it lasts
- Certainty (city)
- Sure of pleasure?
- Extent (expect)
- How widely it covers/spreads
- Propinquity (propa')
- Nearer the better
- Fecundity (Fat)
- chance of it repeating
- Purity (Preists
- Lesser the pain the better
- Measured in Hedons
- Intensity (In)
- ACT!
- Utility
Act Utilitarianism
- Considers consequence
- Relativistic
- Takes situation into account
- Decisions based on best consequence ( most happiness)
- Associated with Bentham
- Hedonic calculus applied in every situation no matter what
- Seems to favour individual cases
John Stuart Mill's Rule Utilitarianism
- Levels of pleasure
- Bentham Wrong...
- Pleasure is qualitative not quantitative
- Otherwise it could justify gang rape
- Mill more linked with writings from Aristotle on happiness (eudaimonia
- Higher and Lower pleasures
- Some pleasures more significant than others...Quality not quantity
- Higher pleasures of the mind
- Intellectual pleasures such as reading poetry
- Lower pleasures physical
- Eg: having a feast
- serves to meet baisic body needs
- Lower pleasures important but aim for higher pleasures
- Quantity should be weighed against quality of pleasure
- Universalisability/Harm principle
- Mill was a civil servant and wanted social reform
- He wanted to show right and wrong in one situation is for all
- Why?
- 1.We all want happiness
- 2.Happiness only desirable as end as thing sonly desired because they bring happiness
- 3.Everyone ought to increase happiness for all as overall happiness increase will increase my happiness
- Why?
- Bentham's too centred on individuals
- Society made up of individuals that need to be collectively happy
- Mill promoting more universal happiness
- Society made up of individuals that need to be collectively happy
- Harm principle idea that we want to avoid it
- If everyone does so we are universally avoiding pain
- Levels of pleasure
Development of Rule Utilitarianism
- Moral actions are those that conform to the rules that leads to the greatest good
- Hedonic calculus not needed as well-worked rules of utilitarianism should show the right thing to do
- Strong rule
- action only right if it follows the rules
- Universal nature of rules.... so should lead to greatest happiness
- Rule utilitarians draw similarities between old and present circumstances
- Weak rule
- In great circumstances rules need to be broken
- Eg: 'do not murder'
- what if you could kill Hitler?
- ?
- what if you could kill Hitler?
- Mill believed to be a hybrid of both
Quotes
- "Happiness is a very pretty thing to feel, but a very dry thing to talk about" Bentham
- "Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure" Bentham
- "The immorality of morality" Aurther Miller
- "Better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied" Mill
Imagens e arquivos do mapa
Informações
- Descrição
- Mapa Mental sobre Utilitarianism, criado por Sam Grimes em 18-11-2017.
- Criado por
- Sam Grimes · nov 2017
- Atualizado
- 19 nov 2017
- Visualizações
- 2
- Avaliação


