Mapa mental
Language and Gender
Conteúdo do mapa
Language and Gender
Deborah Tannen
- believes the difference starts in childhood, where parents use more words about feelings to girls and use more verbs to boys. Males and females belong to difference sub-cultures and therefore speak differently.
- Status vs. support
- Men see language as a means of asserting dominance; women see it as a way of confirming/supporting ideas.
- Independence vs. intimacy
- Men "go it alone"; women seek support.
- Advice vs. understanding
- Men see language as problem solving; women see it as a means of empathy.
- Information vs. feelings
- Males are concerned with the facts; women with emotions.
- Orders vs. proposals
- Men use imperatives; females use hidden directives.
- Conflict vs. compromise
- Men will argue; women will try to find a middle ground.
Folklinguistics
- Attitudes and assumptions about language that have no real evidence to support them.
Trudgill
- How male and female speakers pronounce the suffix "ing" like 'walking' and 'laughing'
- Discovered that across social classes, men tended to use a more non-standard pronunciation
- Men marked themselves as using non-standard forms even when they did not, they under-reported
- Women did the opposite and over-reported
- Concluded that male speakers attached a covert prestige to non-standard forms
- Covert prestige: a form of high status given to non-standard forms
Robin Lakoff (1975)
- Features that characterised women's language as deficient when compared to men's
- Use specialised vocab centered around domestic chores
- Precise colour terms e.g. mauve, magenta
- Weak expletive terms e.g. oh dear
- Empty' adjectives e.g. charming, sweet
- Tag questions to show uncertainty e.g. isn't it?
- More polite forms than men use e.g. euphemisms
- The use of hedges e.g. sort of, you know
- intensifiers e.g. so
- Suggested that socialisation played an important role
- Ensured that female language remained less assertive and more insecure when compared to that of men
- The differences were more socially constructed than biologically based
- Ensured that female language remained less assertive and more insecure when compared to that of men
- Janet Holmes (1992)
- Suggests that tag questions are not always a sign of uncertainty
- May also function as a device to help maintain discussion or to be polite
- Tag question: group of words that turn a declarative into an interrogative
- Suggests that other features of 'women's language' like hedges/fillers have a variety of functions
- Suggests that tag questions are not always a sign of uncertainty
- O'Barr + Atkins (1980)
- From their research into language of the courtroom, discovered that many of Lakoff's features did occur
- Men from lower-class backgrounds used similar features
- Leading O'Barr + Atkins to believe that features of uncertain speech were more dependent on power relations rather than gender
- Suggested the term 'powerless language' rather than 'women's language'
- Leading O'Barr + Atkins to believe that features of uncertain speech were more dependent on power relations rather than gender
- Men from lower-class backgrounds used similar features
- From their research into language of the courtroom, discovered that many of Lakoff's features did occur
- The deficit approach
- Features that characterised women's language as deficient when compared to men's
Zimmerman and West (1975)
- Found in their small data that 96% of all interruptions in mixed-sex conversations were made by men
- Women had restricted linguistic freedom and men sought to impose their dominant status through implying explicit constraints in conversational practice
- Women and men do not have equal conversational rights
- The dominance approach
- Found in their small data that 96% of all interruptions in mixed-sex conversations were made by men
Jennifer Coates (1989)
- Suggested that all-female talk is cooperative in the way that speakers help to negotiate discussions and support eachother's rights as speakers
- Argues that these patterns are evidence of differing socio-cultural expectations and differences in sub-cultures
- The difference approach
Sterotypes
- Women are: weak, pretty, intuitive, emotional, domestic, social
- Men are: strong, decisive, practical. rational, public, commanding
Derogatives
- Female: bitch, cunt, slag tart, whore, slut, slapper, dog, cow
- Male: bastard, wanker, dickhead, prick, gay puff, wimp
Semantic derogation
- Unmarked term: the normal/neutral form of a word. Most unmarked terms are considered male e.g. lion
- Covert marking: marking that is understood, eg antonyms young and old
- Overt marking: marking that takes place through affixation or modification
- Covert marking: marking that is understood, eg antonyms young and old
- Marked term: the form of a word that stands out from the norm e.g. lioness
- Adding a diminutive suffix
- The sense of negative meaning or connotation that some lexical items have attached to them
- Where the female term in a male/female pair will acquire negative connotations over time.
- E.g. "bachelor" and "spinster" have the same denotation, but different connotations
- Where the female term in a male/female pair will acquire negative connotations over time.
- Semantic deterioration: the process by which negative connotations become attached to lexical items
- Unmarked term: the normal/neutral form of a word. Most unmarked terms are considered male e.g. lion
Political Correctness
- To find the gender pairs and replace them with more gender-neutral terms: e.g. police officer, fire fighter
Generic Terms
- A term that generalises the population rather than individually naming it e.g mankind
Default Assumptions
- Our language makes assumptions of what is 'usual' and what is 'normal e.g. surgeon being a man
Informações
- Descrição
- Mapa Mental sobre Language and Gender, criado por Annabelle Langmead em 14-04-2015.
- Criado por
- Annabelle Langmead
- Visualizações
- 6
- Avaliação