Notas
Breach of Duty
Conteúdo das notas (1)
Página 1
Breach of Duty
The first thing that the court will consider is the standard
of care that the defendant owes the claimant. They should show reasonable
competence; Nettleship v Weston. If the defendant is a professional then
they must show professional competence; Bolam which states that ‘a man
need not possess the highest expert skill it is… sufficient if he shows the ordinary
skill of an ordinary competent man exercising that particular art or skill’. Also,
if the professional defendant acts in accordance with other professionals then
they are not in breach; Bolitho.
The court will also consider whether the defendant took
reasonable precautions; Bolton v Stone. The defendant does not have to
do everything, only that is within their resources; Paris. The defendant
only has to protect against thing that they know about; Roe. Some people are owed a higher duty of care
e.g. disabled people; Morrell. Also, if the defendant is a minor then
their age will also be taken into consideration; Mullins. The size of
the risk will also be taken into consideration, the bigger the risk the more
precautions should be taken; Haley.
Sometimes a defendant is held to have made an error of
judgement rather than a breach in duty; Whitehouse v Jordan.
New Page
Informações
- Descrição
- basic 10 mark answer detailing standard of care ; nettleship v weston, bolam, bolitho, reasonable precaution; bolton v stone, paris, roe, morrell, mullins, haley and error of judgement : whitehouse v jordan
- Criado por
- cecollier · mai 2014
- Atualizado
- 13 jul 2016
- Visualizações
- 91
- Avaliação