Quiz
Laws101
This quiz has question types that open in the usual player.
Questions in this quiz (23)
1Finder has rights to keep an item against all but the true owner
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
2Trespassers are excluded finders rights
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
3Finders obligation toward finding the true owner
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
4Finder has to take item under their care and control
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
5The item must be lost
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
6Employees act as an agent of their employer
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
7Occupiers have a potential claim to lost items
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
8Occupiers have an obligation to take measures to find the true owner
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
9Occupiers cannot claim finders rights if the item was handed in
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
10Intention to control must be manifest
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
11Advertising the item fulfils finder's obligations
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
12Notifying the police fulfils the finder's obligations
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
13If it is not attached to the property it is not part of the property
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
14If the owner of the property had no knowledge of the item, then it removes occupiers rights.
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
15Armory v Delamirie ([blank_start]1722[blank_end])
Bridges v Hawkesworth ([blank_start]1851[blank_end])
South Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman ([blank_start]1896[blank_end])
Hannah v Peel ([blank_start]1945[blank_end])
Parker v British Airways ([blank_start]1982[blank_end])
Tamworth Industries v Attorney General ([blank_start]1991[blank_end])- A1722
- B1851
- C1896
- D1945
- E1982
- F1991
- G1992
- H1856
- I1748
- J1845
- K1986
16Armory v Delamirie
- AEichelbaum CJ
- BBirkett J
- CPratt CJ
17Bridges v Hawkesworth
- APatteson J
- BPratt CJ
- CDonaldson LJ
- DEveleigh LJ
18Lord Russell of Killowen
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DParker v British Airways
- ETamworth Industries v Attorney General
19Hannah v Peel
- ABirkett J
- BEichelbaum CJ
- CPratt CJ
- DDavid Cairns
20Parker v British Airways
- ADonaldson LJ
- BPatteson J
- CEichelbaum CJ
21Eichelbaum CJ
- AParker v British Airways
- BTamworth Industries v Attorney General
- CArmory v Delamirie
- DSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- EBridges v Hawkesworth
- FHannah v Peel
22Rights derived from true owner superior to finder and occupier -
[blank_start]Moffatt[blank_end] v [blank_start]Kazana[blank_end] [1968]- AMoffatt
- BKazana
23If things are found in the course of employment or agency, must account to principal.
- City of London v [blank_start]Appleyard[blank_end] [1963]- AAppleyard
Information
- Description
- Quiz on Laws101, created by Caitlin Buchanan on 19/09/2017.
- Author
- Caitlin Buchanan
- Language
- English
- Views
- 5
- Rating
- No ratings yet Rate this quiz