Quiz
Quiz T
This quiz has question types that open in the usual player.
Questions in this quiz (101)
1Elements required for a prima facia case for an intentional tort
1. [blank_start]Voluntary act[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Specific or general intent[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]Causation[blank_end]- AVoluntary act
- BSpecific or general intent
- CCausation
2What intentional torts does the transferred intent doctrine apply to?
1. [blank_start]Assault[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Battery[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]False imprisonment[blank_end]
4. [blank_start]Trespass to land[blank_end]
5. [blank_start]Trespass to chattels[blank_end]- AAssault
- BBattery
- CFalse imprisonment
- DTrespass to land
- ETrespass to chattels
3What are the elements of battery?
1. [blank_start]Defendant causes[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Harmful or offensive contact[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]To plaintiff's person[blank_end]
4. [blank_start]And has specific or general intent[blank_end]- ADefendant causes
- BHarmful or offensive contact
- CTo plaintiff's person
- DAnd has specific or general intent
4What is offensive conduct?
Conduct offensive to a person of [blank_start]ordinary[blank_end] [blank_start]sensibility[blank_end].- Aordinary
- Bsensibility
5What are the elements of assault?
1. Defendant [blank_start]creates[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]reasonable[blank_end] [blank_start]apprehension[blank_end] in the plaintiff
3. of [blank_start]imminent[blank_end] [blank_start]harmful[blank_end] or [blank_start]offensive[blank_end] [blank_start]bodily[blank_end] [blank_start]contact[blank_end] to the plaintiff's person
4. with [blank_start]specific or general intent[blank_end]- Acreates
- Breasonable
- Capprehension
- Dimminent
- Eharmful
- Foffensive
- Gbodily
- Hcontact
- Ispecific or general intent
6Words [blank_start]do not[blank_end] constitute assault
- Ado not
7What are the elements of false imprisonment?
1. D [blank_start]causes[blank_end]
2. P's [blank_start]confinement[blank_end] within [blank_start]fixed[blank_end] [blank_start]boundaries[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]with specific or general intent[blank_end]- Awith specific or general intent
- Bcauses
- Cconfinement
- Dfixed
- Eboundaries
8What methods can D use to confine P?
1. [blank_start]physical barriers[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]force[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]threats[blank_end]
4. [blank_start]invalid use of authority[blank_end]
5. [blank_start]duress[blank_end]
6. [blank_start]failure[blank_end] to provide a [blank_start]safe means of escape[blank_end]- Aphysical barriers
- Bforce
- Cthreats
- Dinvalid use of authority
- Eduress
- Ffailure
- Gsafe means of escape
9What constitutes confinement?
1. [blank_start]no reasonable means of escape[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]P is aware or harmed[blank_end]- Ano reasonable means of escape
- BP is aware or harmed
10What is the shopkeeper's privilege?
1. [blank_start]Shopkeeper can detain shoplifter[blank_end]
2. for a [blank_start]reasonable time and manner[blank_end]- AShopkeeper can detain shoplifter
- Breasonable time and manner
11What are the elements of intentional infliction of emotion distress?
1. D acts with [blank_start]extreme or outrageous conduct[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]which causes[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]severe emotional distress[blank_end]
4. and [blank_start]intends[blank_end] or is [blank_start]reckless[blank_end] in causing severe emotional distress- Aextreme or outrageous conduct
- Bwhich causes
- Csevere emotional distress
- Dintends
- Ereckless
12What is considered extreme or outrageous conduct?
Conduct that a [blank_start]reasonable person[blank_end] regards as [blank_start]intolerable in a civilized society.[blank_end]- Areasonable person
- Bintolerable in a civilized society.
13Transferred intent [blank_start]does not[blank_end] apply to intentional infliction of emotional distress.
- Adoes not
14Unlike other intentional torts, reckless conduct [blank_start]will[blank_end] satisfy the intent requirement for IIED.
- Awill
15What are the elements of trespass to land?
1. [blank_start]D causes[blank_end]
2. a [blank_start]physical invasion of P's real property[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]with specific or general intent[blank_end]- AD causes
- Bphysical invasion of P's real property
- Cwith specific or general intent
16Mistake of fact is [blank_start]not a defense[blank_end] to trespass
- Anot a defense
17What are the elements of trespass to chattels?
1. [blank_start]D causes[blank_end]
2. an [blank_start]interference[blank_end] with P's [blank_start]right of possession in a chattel[blank_end]
3. and has [blank_start]specific or general intent[blank_end]- AD causes
- Binterference
- Cright of possession in a chattel
- Dspecific or general intent
18What are two ways that D can interfere with P's right of possession in a chattel?
1. [blank_start]Intermeddling[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Dispossession[blank_end]- AIntermeddling
- BDispossession
19What are the elements of conversion?
1. [blank_start]D causes[blank_end]
2. an [blank_start]interference[blank_end] with P's [blank_start]right of possession in a chattel[blank_end]
3. that [blank_start]deprives P entirely of the use[blank_end] of the chattel
4. and has [blank_start]specific or general intent[blank_end]- AD causes
- Binterference
- Cright of possession in a chattel
- Ddeprives P entirely of the use
- Especific or general intent
20What are 3 defenses to intentional torts?
1. [blank_start]consent[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]self defense or others[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]necessity[blank_end]- Aconsent
- Bself defense or others
- Cnecessity
21When is consent a defense to an intentional tort?
1. [blank_start]Implied or express[blank_end] consent
2. was [blank_start]valid[blank_end] (no fraud, incapacity)
3. and [blank_start]D's conduct was in boundaries[blank_end] of P's consent- AImplied or express
- Bvalid
- CD's conduct was in boundaries
22When is self-defense or others a defense to intentional torts?
1. [blank_start]D reasonably believed[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]P was going to harm[blank_end] D or others
3. and D used only [blank_start]proportion[blank_end] and [blank_start]reasonably necessary[blank_end] force to protect himself- AD reasonably believed
- BP was going to harm
- Cproportion
- Dreasonably necessary
23[blank_start]Deadly force[blank_end] cannot be used to prevent harm to property
- ADeadly force
24A [blank_start]reasonable mistake[blank_end] as to the existence of danger is allowed in self-defense.
- Areasonable mistake
25Can D use self defense if D started the fight?
If [blank_start]D was initial agressor, no self defense[blank_end].
Unless
P responded to [blank_start]nondeadly force with deadly force[blank_end].- AD was initial agressor, no self defense
- Bnondeadly force with deadly force
26Can a D use deadly force to prevent harm to property?
No, [blank_start]D can use R force[blank_end] if [blank_start]R necessary to prevent harm to property[blank_end].- AD can use R force
- BR necessary to prevent harm to property
27D can claim the defense of [blank_start]necessity[blank_end] if he entered P's land or interfered with P's personal property, provided that the D does so [blank_start]to prevent an injury[blank_end] or some [blank_start]other severe harm[blank_end].
- Anecessity
- Bto prevent an injury
- Cother severe harm
28When is the necessity defense private?
[blank_start]Private necessity[blank_end] is available if D acts [blank_start]to benefit a limited number of people[blank_end].
D must pay for the [blank_start]actual damages he caused[blank_end].
But landowner [blank_start]cannot use force to exclude D[blank_end] from his property.- APrivate necessity
- Bto benefit a limited number of people
- Cactual damages he caused
- Dcannot use force to exclude D
29When is the necessity defense public?
D can claim [blank_start]public necessity[blank_end] if he [blank_start]acted for the public good.[blank_end]
D [blank_start]is not liable[blank_end] for the [blank_start]property damage[blank_end] he caused.- Apublic necessity
- Bacted for the public good.
- Cis not liable
- Dproperty damage
30What are the elements for a prima facie case for negligence?
1. [blank_start]Duty[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Breach[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]Causation[blank_end]
4. [blank_start]Damages[blank_end]- ADuty
- BBreach
- CCausation
- DDamages
31A duty of care is owed to all [blank_start]foreseeable[blank_end] Ps that [blank_start]may be harmed[blank_end] by D's breach
Majority - [blank_start]foreseeable zone of danger[blank_end]
Minority - [blank_start]everyone harmed[blank_end]- Aforeseeable
- Bmay be harmed
- Cforeseeable zone of danger
- Deveryone harmed
32When is there an affirmative duty to act?
1. D places D in [blank_start]danger[blank_end]
2. D has [blank_start]special relationship[blank_end] to P
3. D has [blank_start]duty to act[blank_end] affirmatively imposed by law, OR
4. D attempts to [blank_start]help or rescue P[blank_end]- Adanger
- Bspecial relationship
- Cduty to act
- Dhelp or rescue P
33A good samaritan is [blank_start]liable[blank_end] for injuries caused by his failure to [blank_start]exercise reasonable care[blank_end] in his [blank_start]aid[blank_end] or rescue.
- Aliable
- Bexercise reasonable care
- Caid
34What is the standard of care owed by D to P?
D owes P the standard of care of [blank_start]a reasonably prudent person[blank_end] under [blank_start]similar circumstances[blank_end] as measured by an [blank_start]objective[blank_end] standard.- Aa reasonably prudent person
- Bsimilar circumstances
- Cobjective
35D is presumed to have [blank_start]average[blank_end] mental abilities and [blank_start]knowledge[blank_end].
- Aaverage
- Bknowledge
36The standard of care for a disabled person is that of [blank_start]a reasonably prudent disabled person[blank_end] under [blank_start]similar circumstances[blank_end] as measured by an [blank_start]objective[blank_end] standard.
- Aa reasonably prudent disabled person
- Bsimilar circumstances
- Cobjective
37To what standard of care are drunk people held to?
[blank_start]Sober people[blank_end]- ASober people
38When does the default standard of care (R person) not apply?
1. [blank_start]Children[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Professionals[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]Doctors[blank_end]
4. [blank_start]Landowners[blank_end]
5. [blank_start]Negligence per se[blank_end]- AChildren
- BProfessionals
- CDoctors
- DLandowners
- ENegligence per se
39Children are held to the standard of care of [blank_start]a reasonably prudent child[blank_end] of similar [blank_start]age[blank_end], [blank_start]experience[blank_end], and [blank_start]intelligence[blank_end] under the circumstances, unless the child engages in an [blank_start]adult[blank_end] activity.
- Aa reasonably prudent child
- Bage
- Cexperience
- Dintelligence
- Eadult
40Professionals' standard of care
A [blank_start]professional[blank_end] is expected to have the [blank_start]knowledge[blank_end] and [blank_start]skill[blank_end] of a member of their profession in [blank_start]good standing[blank_end] in [blank_start]similar communities[blank_end].- Aprofessional
- Bknowledge
- Cskill
- Dgood standing
- Esimilar communities
41Physicians are held to a [blank_start]national[blank_end] standard of care and have a duty to [blank_start]disclose the risks of treatment[blank_end] to enable patients [blank_start]to give informed consent[blank_end].
- Anational
- Bdisclose the risks of treatment
- Cto give informed consent
42Psychotherapists have a duty [blank_start]to warn potential victims[blank_end] of of a patient's [blank_start]serious threats of harm[blank_end] if the patient has the apparent [blank_start]intent and ability[blank_end] to carry out the threats and the [blank_start]victims are readily identifiable[blank_end].
- Ato warn potential victims
- Bserious threats of harm
- Cintent and ability
- Dvictims are readily identifiable
43What duty of care does a landowner owe anticipated trespassers?
Landowners owe [blank_start]anticipated trespassers[blank_end] a duty [blank_start]to warn[blank_end] of hidden dangers that pose a risk of [blank_start]serious bodily harm[blank_end] (but only [blank_start]artificial conditions[blank_end] the landowner is [blank_start]aware[blank_end] of)- Aanticipated trespassers
- Bto warn
- Cserious bodily harm
- Dartificial conditions
- Eaware
44Landowners [blank_start]owe no duty[blank_end] to undiscovered trespassers.
- Aowe no duty
45What duty do landowners owe to licensees?
Landowners owe licensees a [blank_start]duty to warn[blank_end] them of [blank_start]hidden dangers[blank_end] that pose an [blank_start]unreasonable risk of harm[blank_end] (applies to [blank_start]artificial and natural[blank_end] conditions), but no duty to [blank_start]inspect the property[blank_end].- Aduty to warn
- Bhidden dangers
- Cunreasonable risk of harm
- Dartificial and natural
- Einspect the property
46What is a licensee?
A person who [blank_start]lawfully enters[blank_end] the landowner's property for [blank_start]his own benefit[blank_end], such as [blank_start]social guests[blank_end].- Alawfully enters
- Bhis own benefit
- Csocial guests
47What duty do landowners owe invitees?
Landowners owe invitees a duty [blank_start]to reasonably inspect[blank_end] the land for [blank_start]hidden dangers[blank_end] that pose [blank_start]an unreasonable risk of harm[blank_end], and to [blank_start]make safe any discovered dangers[blank_end].- Ato reasonably inspect
- Bhidden dangers
- Can unreasonable risk of harm
- Dmake safe any discovered dangers
48An invitee is [blank_start]a person the landowner invites[blank_end] for the [blank_start]landowner's own benefit[blank_end] or mutual benefit with the invitee.
- Aa person the landowner invites
- Blandowner's own benefit
49What standard applies to landowners in states that reject the traditional approach distinctions between licensees and invitees?
Duty of [blank_start]reasonable care to all entrants[blank_end]- Areasonable care to all entrants
50What is the attractive nuisance doctrine?
Landowners owe child trespassers a duty to [blank_start]warn them of artificial conditions[blank_end] on the land if:
1. the landowner should know the [blank_start]children are likely to trespass[blank_end] where the artificial conditions are
2. the landowner should know the [blank_start]artificial condition[blank_end] poses an [blank_start]unreasonable risk[blank_end] of [blank_start]serious bodily injury[blank_end]
3. due to children's [blank_start]age[blank_end], they [blank_start]do not appreciate the danger[blank_end] involved, and
4. the [blank_start]risk of harm outweighs[blank_end] the [blank_start]expense of making the condition safe[blank_end]- Awarn them of artificial conditions
- Bchildren are likely to trespass
- Cartificial condition
- Dunreasonable risk
- Eserious bodily injury
- Fage
- Gdo not appreciate the danger
- Hrisk of harm outweighs
- Iexpense of making the condition safe
51A violation of a statute that imposes a duty for the benefit of others constitutes [blank_start]negligence per se[blank_end] if the plaintiff
1. is in the [blank_start]class of people protected by the statue[blank_end] and
2. [blank_start]suffers the type of harm[blank_end] the statute [blank_start]protects against[blank_end]- Anegligence per se
- Bclass of people protected by the statue
- Csuffers the type of harm
- Dprotects against
52The D is [blank_start]liable[blank_end] under negligence per se if his [blank_start]violation of the statute[blank_end] was the [blank_start]proximate cause[blank_end] of the [blank_start]plaintiff's injury[blank_end].
- Aliable
- Bviolation of the statute
- Cproximate cause
- Dplaintiff's injury
53What does res ipsa loquitor mean?
[blank_start]The thing speaks for itself[blank_end]- AThe thing speaks for itself
54Res ipsa loquitor is applied when an element of [blank_start]negligence is difficult to prove[blank_end], but the [blank_start]circumstances[blank_end] make it obvious that it was the [blank_start]cause of harm[blank_end].
P must show that harm
1. [blank_start]does not[blank_end] ordinarily [blank_start]occur without negligence[blank_end]
2. was caused by something within [blank_start]D's exclusive control[blank_end]
3. was [blank_start]not caused by P[blank_end] (in some jxns)- Anegligence is difficult to prove
- Bcircumstances
- Ccause of harm
- Ddoes not
- Eoccur without negligence
- FD's exclusive control
- Gnot caused by P
55To prove negligence, P must show that D's conduct was both the [blank_start]actual[blank_end] and [blank_start]proximate[blank_end] cause of P's injury.
- Aactual
- Bproximate
56How can a P prove actual cause?
P must show her injury would not have occurred [blank_start]but for D's breach[blank_end] (if [blank_start]but for[blank_end] can't be shown, courts will use a [blank_start]substantial factor[blank_end] test)- Abut for D's breach
- Bbut for
- Csubstantial factor
57How can P prove proximate cause?
P shows her injury was a [blank_start]foreseeable result of D's conduct[blank_end].- Aforeseeable result of D's conduct
58What is an intervening cause?
An [blank_start]outside action[blank_end] that [blank_start]contributes[blank_end] to P's harm [blank_start]after D's breach[blank_end] has occurred.
If it is unforeseeable, it is a [blank_start]superseding cause[blank_end] and D's liability is [blank_start]cut off from that point forward[blank_end].- Aoutside action
- Bcontributes
- Cafter D's breach
- Dsuperseding cause
- Ecut off from that point forward
59The Fireman's Rule bars lawsuits by [blank_start]police and firefighters[blank_end] from [blank_start]collecting damages[blank_end] that occur [blank_start]in the course of duties[blank_end] even if they were due to [blank_start]negligence[blank_end].
- Apolice and firefighters
- Bcollecting damages
- Cin the course of duties
- Dnegligence
60Under the eggshell plaintiff rule, D is liable for [blank_start]all harm suffered by P[blank_end], even if [blank_start]P suffers from a condition[blank_end] that [blank_start]aggravated the harm[blank_end]
- Aall harm suffered by P
- BP suffers from a condition
- Caggravated the harm
61Under respondeat superior, [blank_start]principal may be liable[blank_end] [blank_start]for agent's torts[blank_end] if
1. an [blank_start]employer-employee relationship exists[blank_end], and
2. commission of the tort is [blank_start]within the agent's scope of employment[blank_end]- Aprincipal may be liable
- Bfor agent's torts
- Cemployer-employee relationship exists
- Dwithin the agent's scope of employment
62The more [blank_start]control[blank_end] that a [blank_start]principal exercises[blank_end] of over the [blank_start]agent's work[blank_end], the more an agent will be considered an [blank_start]employee[blank_end].
- Acontrol
- Bprincipal exercises
- Cagent's work
- Demployee
63Employee's conduct will be considered within the scope of employment if employee's conduct was
1. something he was [blank_start]hired to perform[blank_end]
2. within the employee's [blank_start]authorized time and space limits[blank_end]
3. for the [blank_start]employer's benefit[blank_end]
4. [blank_start]foreseeable[blank_end]- Ahired to perform
- Bauthorized time and space limits
- Cemployer's benefit
- Dforeseeable
64Employer remains liable for employee's [blank_start]detour[blank_end], but not [blank_start]frolic[blank_end] (a major [blank_start]deviation from scope of employment[blank_end])
- Adetour
- Bfrolic
- Cdeviation from scope of employment
65Employers are not liable to employees' intentional torts unless
1. [blank_start]authorized by employer[blank_end]
2. within [blank_start]scope of employment in employee's work[blank_end]- Aauthorized by employer
- Bscope of employment in employee's work
66Business partners are liable for their partner's torts if they are [blank_start]committed[blank_end] within the [blank_start]scope of the business's purpose[blank_end].
- Acommitted
- Bscope of the business's purpose
67What are the 3 ways that a plaintiff can recover for NIED?
1. [blank_start]Zone of Danger[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Bystander Recovery[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]Special Relationship[blank_end]- AZone of Danger
- BBystander Recovery
- CSpecial Relationship
68What must plaintiff prove to recover for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress under zone of danger?
1. D [blank_start]negligently[blank_end] caused [blank_start]a threat of physical impact[blank_end]
2. P was within the [blank_start]zone of danger[blank_end] of the [blank_start]physical impact[blank_end], and
3. [blank_start]Threat[blank_end] of the [blank_start]impact[blank_end] caused [blank_start]emotional distress[blank_end]- Anegligently
- Ba threat of physical impact
- Czone of danger
- Dphysical impact
- EThreat
- Fimpact
- Gemotional distress
69What must plaintiff prove to recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress under bystander recovery?
1. D [blank_start]negligently[blank_end] [blank_start]inflicted[blank_end] [blank_start]bodily[blank_end] [blank_start]injury[blank_end] to another
2. P is [blank_start]closely related[blank_end]
3. P was [blank_start]present at the scene[blank_end], and
4. P [blank_start]personally observed[blank_end] the injury
Some jxns require the bystander plaintiff to manifest [blank_start]physical symptoms[blank_end] after witnessing the injury.- Anegligently
- Binflicted
- Cbodily
- Dinjury
- Eclosely related
- Fpresent at the scene
- Gpersonally observed
- Hphysical symptoms
70What must a plaintiff prove in order to recover for NIED under special relationship?
1. A [blank_start]pre-existing[blank_end] [blank_start]relationship[blank_end] exists between the P and D, and
2. D [blank_start]negligently[blank_end] [blank_start]mishandles a corpse[blank_end] or provides [blank_start]false medical information[blank_end]- Apre-existing
- Brelationship
- Cnegligently
- Dmishandles a corpse
- Efalse medical information
71Under joint and several liability, each defendant is [blank_start]independently[blank_end] [blank_start]liable[blank_end] for the [blank_start]entire[blank_end] [blank_start]damages[blank_end] resulting from the tort, and the plaintiff can collect the [blank_start]full[blank_end] [blank_start]value[blank_end] of a judgment against [blank_start]any[blank_end] [blank_start]one[blank_end] [blank_start]defendant[blank_end].
- Aindependently
- Bliable
- Centire
- Ddamages
- Efull
- Fvalue
- Gany
- Hone
- Idefendant
72Contribution allows a [blank_start]D[blank_end] who pays [blank_start]more[blank_end] [blank_start]than[blank_end] [blank_start]his[blank_end] [blank_start]share[blank_end] [blank_start]of[blank_end] [blank_start]damages[blank_end] to recover from the other defendants their [blank_start]percentage[blank_end] [blank_start]share[blank_end] [blank_start]of[blank_end] [blank_start]fault[blank_end].
- AD
- Bmore
- Cthan
- Dhis
- Eshare
- Fof
- Gdamages
- Hpercentage
- Iof
- Jfault
- Kshare
73Alternative liability allows a [blank_start]plaintiff[blank_end] to [blank_start]shift[blank_end] the [blank_start]burden of proving causation[blank_end] to the [blank_start]defendants[blank_end] if P can't [blank_start]identify[blank_end] which [blank_start]caused his harm[blank_end].
- Aplaintiff
- Bshift
- Cburden of proving causation
- Ddefendants
- Eidentify
- Fcaused his harm
74Indemnification allows a [blank_start]passive tortfeasor[blank_end] who was [blank_start]forced to pay damages[blank_end] to [blank_start]recover complete reimbursement[blank_end] from an [blank_start]active tortfeasor[blank_end].
- Apassive tortfeasor
- Bforced to pay damages
- Crecover complete reimbursement
- Dactive tortfeasor
75What are the three defenses to negligence?
1. [blank_start]Contributory negligence[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Comparative fault[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]Assumption of the risk[blank_end]- AContributory negligence
- BComparative fault
- CAssumption of the risk
76In a [blank_start]contributory negligence[blank_end] jurisdiction, the plaintiff cannot recover damages if his own negligence contributed to his injury in any way, unless the defendant
1. engaged in [blank_start]wanton and willful misconduct[blank_end], or
2. had [blank_start]last clear chance[blank_end] to avoid injuring the plaintiff
Contributory negligence is not a valid defense for [blank_start]intentional torts[blank_end]- Awanton and willful misconduct
- Blast clear chance
- Ccontributory negligence
- Dintentional torts
77What are the two approaches to comparative fault?
1. [blank_start]Pure comparative[blank_end] negligence - recovery limited by [blank_start]P's own negligence[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Modified comparative[blank_end] negligence - recovery limited by [blank_start]P's negligence[blank_end] and must be [blank_start]more[blank_end] [blank_start]at fault[blank_end] [blank_start]than D[blank_end]- APure comparative
- BModified comparative
- CP's own negligence
- DP's negligence
- Emore
- Fat fault
- Gthan D
78Assumption of risk is a defense to negligence if a party [blank_start]knowingly[blank_end] and [blank_start]willingly[blank_end] assumes the risk for [blank_start]his own purposes[blank_end]. May be [blank_start]express[blank_end] or [blank_start]implied[blank_end].
- Aknowingly
- Bwillingly
- Chis own purposes
- Dexpress
- Eimplied
79Under strict liability, D is liable for damages regardless of how [blank_start]careful[blank_end] they were.
There are 3 categories of strict liability
1. [blank_start]Animals[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Abnormally dangerous activities[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]Defective products[blank_end]- Acareful
- BAnimals
- CAbnormally dangerous activities
- DDefective products
80There is [blank_start]no[blank_end] strict liability for harm caused by [blank_start]domestic[blank_end] animals unless the owner [blank_start]should know[blank_end] of it's [blank_start]dangerous propensity[blank_end].
- Ano
- Bdomestic
- Cshould know
- Ddangerous propensity
81What are domestic animals?
Domestic animals have been [blank_start]trained[blank_end] over time to live and breed in a [blank_start]tame[blank_end] condition ([blank_start]cats[blank_end], [blank_start]dogs[blank_end], [blank_start]farm animals[blank_end])- Atrained
- Btame
- Ccats
- Ddogs
- Efarm animals
82What are wild animals?
Animals whose [blank_start]species or class[blank_end] is not usually kept in the [blank_start]service[blank_end] of [blank_start]mankind[blank_end].
Owners of wild animals are [blank_start]strictly liable[blank_end] for harm caused by the animal, regardless of [blank_start]safety precautions[blank_end] taken by the owner, except if the harm is caused to [blank_start]trespassers[blank_end].- Aspecies or class
- Bservice
- Cmankind
- Dstrictly liable
- Esafety precautions
- Ftrespassers
83The elements of abnormally dangerous activities are:
1. [blank_start]inherently dangerous[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]inappropriate[blank_end] for the [blank_start]location[blank_end]
3. virtually [blank_start]impossible to make safe[blank_end], and
4. of l[blank_start]ittle value[blank_end] to the [blank_start]community[blank_end]- Ainherently dangerous
- Binappropriate
- Clocation
- Dimpossible to make safe
- Eittle value
- Fcommunity
84What must a plaintiff prove to recover under products liability?
1. Product was [blank_start]defective[blank_end] in [blank_start]manufacture[blank_end], [blank_start]design[blank_end], or [blank_start]failure to warn[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]Defect existed[blank_end] when [blank_start]product left D's control[blank_end], and
3. Defect caused P's injury when product was [blank_start]used[blank_end] in a [blank_start]foreseeable[blank_end] way- Adefective
- Bmanufacture
- Cdesign
- Dfailure to warn
- EDefect existed
- Fproduct left D's control
- Gused
- Hforeseeable
85A defect in manufacture requires the plaintiff to show that the product
1. [blank_start]deviated[blank_end] from its [blank_start]intended design[blank_end], and
2. [blank_start]failed[blank_end] to [blank_start]conform[blank_end] to the [blank_start]manufacturer's own design[blank_end].- Adeviated
- Bintended design
- Cfailed
- Dconform
- Emanufacturer's own design
86What are the two tests for design defects?
1. Under the [blank_start]consumer expectation[blank_end] test, P must show that product is [blank_start]less safe[blank_end] than the [blank_start]ordinary consumer[blank_end] would expect.
2. Under the [blank_start]risk-utility test,[blank_end] P must show that product's [blank_start]risks[blank_end] [blank_start]outweigh its benefits[blank_end] and that there is a [blank_start]reasonable alternative design[blank_end]- Aconsumer expectation
- Bless safe
- Cordinary consumer
- Drisk-utility test,
- Erisks
- Foutweigh its benefits
- Greasonable alternative design
87What must plaintiff prove under failure to warn to recover for strict product liability?
1. P was not [blank_start]warned[blank_end] of the [blank_start]risks[blank_end] regarding [blank_start]use of the product[blank_end]
2. risks are not [blank_start]obvious[blank_end] to [blank_start]an ordinary user[blank_end], and
3. [blank_start]designer/manufacturer[blank_end] was [blank_start]aware[blank_end] of the risk- Awarned
- Brisks
- Cuse of the product
- Dobvious
- Ean ordinary user
- Fdesigner/manufacturer
- Gaware
88Who may pursue a products liability claim?
Any person [blank_start]foreseeably injured[blank_end] by a [blank_start]defective product[blank_end] may pursue a products liability claim.- Aforeseeably injured
- Bdefective product
89Who can a products liability claim be brought against?
A products liability claim may be brought against a [blank_start]merchant[blank_end] who is in the [blank_start]chain of distribution.[blank_end]- Amerchant
- Bchain of distribution
90Who is considered a merchant?
Any person or entity who [blank_start]routinely[blank_end] [blank_start]deals[blank_end] in [blank_start]goods of the type[blank_end]- Aroutinely
- Bdeals
- Cgoods of the type
91What are the elements of defamation?
1. [blank_start]D publishes[blank_end]
2. a [blank_start]defamatory statement[blank_end]
3. [blank_start]of or concerning the plaintiff[blank_end]
4. causing [blank_start]damage to the plaintiff's reputation[blank_end]- AD publishes
- Bdefamatory statement
- Cof or concerning the plaintiff
- Ddamage to the plaintiff's reputation
92How can a plaintiff prove that a defamatory statement was published?
The statement was [blank_start]communicated[blank_end] to a [blank_start]third party[blank_end] who [blank_start]understands[blank_end] the content of the statement.- Acommunicated
- Bthird party
- Cunderstands
93What is a defamatory statement?
A statement that is [blank_start]false[blank_end] and [blank_start]not an opinion[blank_end].- Afalse
- Bnot an opinion
94How can a plaintiff prove that a defamatory statement is "of or concerning the plaintiff?"
A [blank_start]reasonable person[blank_end] must [blank_start]believe[blank_end] that the defamatory statement [blank_start]referred[blank_end] to this [blank_start]particular plaintiff.[blank_end]- Areasonable person
- Bbelieve
- Creferred
- Dparticular plaintiff
95If the plaintiff is a public official of public figure suing for defamation, what additional elements must he prove?
D [blank_start]knew[blank_end] the [blank_start]statement[blank_end] was [blank_start]false[blank_end], or acted with [blank_start]reckless disregard[blank_end] for the [blank_start]truth[blank_end].- Aknew
- Bstatement
- Cfalse
- Dreckless disregard
- Etruth
96What additional element must a plaintiff prove if he is a private person and the defamatory statement is of public concern?
1. [blank_start]statement was false[blank_end] , and
2. speaker was at least [blank_start]negligent[blank_end]- Astatement was false
- Bnegligent
97What kind of damages can a plaintiff recover for defamation if he is a public official or figure?
Only [blank_start]actual[blank_end] [blank_start]proven[blank_end] damages, not [blank_start]punitive[blank_end] or [blank_start]presumed[blank_end] damages.- Aactual
- Bproven
- Cpunitive
- Dpresumed
98What kind of damages can a plaintiff recover for defamation if he is a private individual and the statement is a matter of public concern?
[blank_start]Actual[blank_end] [blank_start]proven[blank_end] damages, unless P can show [blank_start]malice[blank_end] (D [blank_start]knew[blank_end] the statement was [blank_start]false[blank_end] or acted with [blank_start]reckless[blank_end] [blank_start]disregard for the truth[blank_end])- AActual
- Bproven
- Cmalice
- Dknew
- Efalse
- Freckless
- Gdisregard for the truth
99What is libel?
Libel is a [blank_start]written[blank_end] or [blank_start]recorded[blank_end] statement. Recovery is allowed [blank_start]without[blank_end] [blank_start]proof[blank_end] of [blank_start]concrete[blank_end] [blank_start]measurable[blank_end] [blank_start]harm[blank_end].- Awritten
- Brecorded
- Cwithout
- Dproof
- Econcrete
- Fmeasurable
- Gharm
100What is slander?
Slander is a [blank_start]spoken[blank_end] statement that is [blank_start]not recorded[blank_end]. P can only recover [blank_start]special[blank_end] damages ([blank_start]actual[blank_end] [blank_start]economic[blank_end] loss), unless [blank_start]slander per se[blank_end] applies.- Aspoken
- Bnot recorded
- Cspecial
- Dactual
- Eeconomic
- Fslander per se
101What are the four types of statements that fall under slander per se?
Statements
1. that [blank_start]impugn[blank_end] P's [blank_start]business integrity[blank_end] or [blank_start]skill[blank_end]
2. of [blank_start]unchastity[blank_end] about an [blank_start]unmarried woman[blank_end]
3. of P having a [blank_start]loathsome disease[blank_end]
4. attributing a [blank_start]crime[blank_end] of [blank_start]moral turpitude[blank_end] to P- Aimpugn
- Bbusiness integrity
- Cskill
- Dunchastity
- Eunmarried woman
- Floathsome disease
- Gcrime
- Hmoral turpitude
Information
- Description
- Quiz on Quiz T, created by V vv on 18/12/2018.
- Author
- V vv
- Language
- English
- Views
- 4
- Tags
- Rating
- No ratings yet Rate this quiz