7317831
Description
Quiz by Alex Richardson, updated more than 1 year ago
|
Created by Alex Richardson
over 7 years ago
|
|
Question 1
Question
Why would the vienna circle argue that religious language is meaningless
Answer
-
There is no way to prove it
-
Not everyone can take part
-
Different religions will have their own kind of anguage
Question 2
Question
Cognitivism claims what about religous statements
Answer
-
they can be true or false, statements express propositions and religous language makes claims about the world
-
all language has meaning
-
all language is an expression of emotion
Question 3
Question
what is an analytical statement
Answer
-
a sentence which is true by definition
-
a sentence which is true through verification
-
a sentence which is untrue
Question 4
Question
what type of statement would this be mr miles has six car
Answer
-
synthetic
-
analytical
-
meaningless
Question 5
Question
AJ ayer believed that there was strong verification which was verified in practice and verified in theory which requires no evidence.
Answer
- True
- False
Question 6
Question
Which of these is an advantage for the verification principle
Answer
-
It is not just an argument against God as according to the theory atheists and agnostics
-
Aj Ayer stated that weak verification principle
-
Scientific laws become meaningless
-
Some religous statements might be verifiable in principle, such as biblical events
-
Swinburne argued universal statements cannot be verified so meaningless yet we would agree '
Question 7
Question
What did Richard Swinburne argue
Answer
-
Any language is meaningful
-
all universal statements can't be verified
-
all language is meaningless as it is just opinion
Question 8
Question
AJ Ayers version of the verification principle was considered an improvement over the Vienna circle due to the fact that he claimed that we can actually verify through a limited amount of evidence and do not need a physical observation
Answer
- True
- False
Question 9
Question
Hick claimed that in fact religious statements are not meaningless due to what reason
Answer
-
It is entierly subjective
-
there is no way to verify athiesim
-
these statements could be verified in the after life
Question 10
Question
Why did flew object to religous language
Answer
-
He did not believe in God
-
He felt that anything that could be disproved is not valid
-
He felt that scientific terminology was more accurate
Question 11
Question
Mitchell argued that in fact Flew was correct
Answer
- True
- False
Question 12
Question
What is the Via Negitiva
Answer
-
The idea that God should never be spoken about negatively
-
the theory we can only describe God in a negative way
-
The idea God can be described in both a negative and positive way
Question 13
Question
Some of the problems with religious language are that God is a [blank_start]abstract property[blank_end]. He also does not exist in [blank_start]time[blank_end] or [blank_start]space[blank_end].
Answer
-
space
-
time
-
abstract property
Question 14
Question
What two things is religious language considered to be
Answer
-
Imposible to prove or disprove
-
disregarding of science
-
inconsistent
-
not open to universal experience
Question 15
Question
Why is religious language seen as being incompatible with our understanding of the world
Answer
-
They describe concepts that exist separate from our world.
-
They are unclear on their aims
-
It often contradicts empirical evidence eg ressurection of jesus no human has ever been resurrected
Want to create your own Quizzes for free with GoConqr? Learn more.