Question 1
Question 2
Question
Implied covenants
Question 3
Question
Examples of L’s covenants implied by common law
Answer
-
Covenant for quiet enjoyment
-
Covenant to keep common parts in reasonable repair
-
Covenant to pay rent, rates and taxes
-
Covenant to allow L to discharge his repairing obligation
Question 4
Question
Examples of T’s covenants implied by common law
Answer
-
Covenant to pay rent, rates and taxes
-
Covenant to allow L to discharge his repairing obligation
-
Covenant for quiet enjoyment
-
Covenant to keep common parts in reasonable repair
Question 5
Question
Covenants implied by statute
Answer
-
Improve minimum standard of protection provided for L and T by common law
-
Can usually override express agreement of parties (note contrast with covenants implied by common law)
-
Express agreements always prevail
-
Most statutes which imply terms provide that parties cannot contract out by express agreement
Question 6
Question
Express covenants
Question 7
Question
Typical express covenants
Answer
-
Rent
-
Rent review
-
Repair
-
User
-
Alterations
-
Alienation (assignment and subletting)
-
Covenant for quiet enjoyment
-
Covenant to keep common parts in reasonable repair
Question 8
Answer
-
Parties free to allocate responsibility as they please
-
Parties not free to allocate responsibility as they please
-
L solely responsible (likely to recover cost from T through service charge)
-
T solely responsible
-
L and T share responsibility – most common arrangement :
– L repairs structure and exterior (likely to recover costs through service charge)
- T repairs interior
Question 9
Question
Most common arrangement for repairing covenant
Answer
-
L solely responsible (likely to recover cost from T through service charge)
-
T solely responsible
-
L and T share responsibility – most common arrangement :
– L repairs structure and exterior (likely to recover costs through service charge)
- T repairs interior
Question 10
Question
Steps for disrepair?
Answer
-
1) First identify physical extent of premises to which repairing covenant extends
-
2) First identify physical extent of premises to which repairing covenant extends
-
2) Is there disrepair?
Must be deterioration from a previous physical state
-
1) Is there disrepair?
Must be deterioration from a previous physical state
Question 11
Question
Windows - not deteriorated from previous physical state
Answer
-
Lace v Chantler
-
Walsh v Lonsdale 1882
-
Quick v. Taff Ely B.C.
-
Aslan v Murphy
Question 12
Question
What is the standard of repair?
Question 13
Question
‘fair wear and tear’ exception
Answer
-
natural deterioration
-
T not liable for such damage if there is a fair wear and tear exception
-
T liable for such damage if there is a fair wear and tear exception
-
Has to be expressed in the repairing covenant
-
Implied in repairing covenant
Question 14
Question
This will define standard of repair by reference to condition of property at start of lease
Question 15
Question
Standard of repair when lease does not give guidance
- put premises into state of repair contemplated by covenant
and then to
- keep premises in repair
Question 16
Question
Implication of ‘reasonableness’ requirement
- L must act reasonably when carrying out repairs
- T cannot insist that works undertaken more cheaply if L is being reasonable in his approach
Question 17
Question
Many leases require repair but not renewal
Answer
-
Is there liability to do something about the disrepair?
-
What is the standard of repair?
-
Obligation to renew is more onerous than obligation to repair
Question 18
Question
Remedying of disrepair and inherent defect fell within scope of T’s covenant to repair
Work required was repair not renewal
Answer
-
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v. Davstone (Holdings) Ltd [1980]
-
National car parks v Trinity Development Co 2001
-
FluorDaniel Properties v Shortland Investments [2001]
-
Proudfoot v Hart (1890)
Question 19
Question
CA set out three guidelines for repairing covenants
Answer
-
McDougall v Easington D.C. (1989)
-
National car parks v Trinity Development Co 2001
-
Lister v Lane (1893)
-
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v. Davstone (Holdings) Ltd [1980]
Question 20
Question
Three guidelines: a) Do the alterations..
Answer
-
affect the whole or substantially the whole of the building?
-
make the building different in character from the building originally let?
-
cost a significant proportion of the value of the previous existing building?
Question 21
Question
Three guidelines: b) Do the alterations..
Answer
-
affect the whole or substantially the whole of the building?
-
make the building different in character from the building originally let?
-
cost a significant proportion of the value of the previous existing building?
Question 22
Question
Three guidelines: c) Do the alterations..
Answer
-
affect the whole or substantially the whole of the building?
-
make the building different in character from the building originally let?
-
cost a significant proportion of the value of the previous existing building?
Question 23
Question
Alienation: T disposing of lease
Question 24
Answer
-
T is free to dispose of premises as he chooses unless lease contains restriction on T’s right to dispose
-
T is not free to dispose of premises as he chooses unless lease contains restriction on T’s right to dispose
Question 25
Question
Three categories of restrictive lease covenants:
Question 26
Question
Absolute covenant
Answer
-
T prohibited altogether from doing something
-
T may do the thing in question but only with L’s consent
-
T may do the thing in question with L’s consent and that consent must not be unreasonably withheld
Question 27
Question
Qualified covenant
Answer
-
T may do the thing in question but only with L’s consent
-
T prohibited altogether from doing something
-
T may do the thing in question with L’s consent and that consent must not be unreasonably withheld
Question 28
Question
Fully qualified covenant
Answer
-
T prohibited altogether from doing something
-
T may do the thing in question but only with L’s consent
-
T may do the thing in question with L’s consent and that consent must not be unreasonably withheld
Question 29
Question
Absolute covenants against alienation
Answer
-
If T disposes of premises he will be in breach of covenant but disposal still valid
-
Note also L may waive prohibition
-
Prevented from disposing of interest unless can negotiate with L and obtain L’s consent to a disposal
Question 30
Question
Qualified and fully qualified covenants against alienation
Answer
-
T could request consent but L could still refuse consent on any grounds whatsoever
-
T could request consent and L could not refuse consent
-
T is helped when there is a qualified covenant by section 144 LPA 1925 and section 19(1)(a) LTA 1927
-
T is not helped when there is a qualified covenant by section 144 LPA 1925 and section 19(1)(a) LTA 1927
Question 31
Question
Section 144 LPA 1925
Question 32
Question
Section 19(1)(a) LTA 1927
Question 33
Question
LTA 1988 Section 1(3)
Answer
-
L is under a duty:
- to give consent unless reasonable not to
-
- to serve written notice on T of decision
- within a reasonable time
stating why any consent is withheld or the conditions subject to which it is granted
-
T can sue L for damages if L fails to comply with duty
Question 34
Question 35
Question
What is a reasonable time?
Question 36
Question
When is it unreasonable to refuse consent?
Answer
-
Depends upon circumstances of particular case
-
General principle = L not entitled to refuse consent for reasons which are not connected to subject matter of lease
-
E.g. Proposed new T is of insufficient financial standing
-
Proposed new T’s race or gender
Question 37
Question
LTA 1927 section 19(1A)