BUSL - Quiz #4

Description

Quiz on BUSL - Quiz #4, created by ermarv12 on 30/04/2014.
ermarv12
Quiz by ermarv12, updated more than 1 year ago
ermarv12
Created by ermarv12 about 10 years ago
208
0

Resource summary

Question 1

Question
Causation-in-fact exists if the plaintiff would not have been injured but for the conduct of the defendant.
Answer
  • True
  • False

Question 2

Question
Rita is injured when Steve's coffee-maker explodes due to a manufacturing defect. Rita may not sue the manufacturer for her injuries.
Answer
  • True
  • False

Question 3

Question
Danny is negligent in driving his car and causing a collision with Edna's car. However, Danny pleads and proves Edna was in part comparatively negligent. This defense will prevent Edna from recovering for her injuries.
Answer
  • True
  • False

Question 4

Question
Michael hears a splash in his backyard pool. Investigating, he sees a child he does not know struggling in the water. Michael fails to act and the child drowns. Michael's failure to act is negligence.
Answer
  • True
  • False

Question 5

Question
Frank parks his car near an area where explosives are to be used. Signs nearby indicate possible damage to vehicles parked in the area. Frank returns to find his car damaged. Frank may recover for the damage to his car.
Answer
  • True
  • False

Question 6

Question
Al, Bill, Chad, and Dan were found jointly and severally liable for $100,000 of property damages caused when a frat initiation event got out of control. Al, Bill and Chad do not have the money to pay their fair share of the damages. The only solvent defendant is Dan. The most Dan will have to pay the plaintiff is
Answer
  • $25,000
  • $50,000
  • $75,000
  • $100,000

Question 7

Question
The negligence committed by a professional, such as a doctor or a lawyer, in the conduct of his profession is ____________.
Answer
  • malpractice
  • negligence per se
  • negligence ad hominum
  • res ipsa locquitor

Question 8

Question
Gene is bringing a suit in strict liability for personal injuries caused by a defectively designed hair dryer. Which of the following parties can be defendant in this case?
Answer
  • Electronic Designs, who designed the hair dryer
  • K&L, Inc. who manufactured the hair dryer
  • Big Retail Outlet, who sold the hair dryer to Gene
  • All of the above

Question 9

Question
Iris was at fault in a car crash in which Phil was injured. As they waited for the EMTs to arrive, a plane, which was part of a nearby air show, crashed into Phil, significantly increasing his injuries. Iris will not be liable for this second set of injuries because the plane crash was a
Answer
  • proximate
  • legal
  • foreseeable
  • superseding
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

Business Studies Unit 2
tara.springate
Religious Studies- Marriage and the family
Emma Samieh-Tucker
Summary of AS Psychology Unit 1 Memory
Asterisked
Theories of Religion
Heloise Tudor
Input, output and storage devices
Mr A Esch
Health and Social Care
Kelsey Phillips
Chemistry 2
Peter Hoskins
PSBD TEST # 3_1_1
yog thapa
4. The Skeletal System - bones of the skull
t.whittingham
English spelling rules
Sarah Holmes
Specific topic 7.6 Timber (processes)
T Andrews