GoConqr hat ein neues Design! Sag uns, wie es dir gefällt.

Kostenlos registrieren

Quiz

Worksheet 7

Olivia Tait 22 Fragen

Quiz starten

Dieses Quiz enthält Fragetypen, die sich im gewohnten Player öffnen.

Fragen in diesem Quiz (22)

  1. 1Company X uses a yearly performance evaluation for all its employees. This instrument rates the employee on a scale of 1 to 50, with higher numbers indicating better performance. Assume that Company X gives the performance evaluation for two years.

    Evaluation 1: The first administration was in 2009 and the data was normally distributed with a mean of 30 and a standard deviation of 5.

    Evaluation 2:The second administration, to the same employees, was in 2010. This time, the evaluation data is normally distributed with a mean of 35 and a standard deviation of 2.5.



    April’s score on Evaluation 1 is between two standard deviations above the mean and two standard deviations below the mean. The range (possible values) of April’s score is between a low of [blank_start]20[blank_end] and a high of [blank_start]40[blank_end]
    1. A20
    2. B40
  2. 2
    Company X uses a yearly performance evaluation for all its employees. This instrument rates the employee on a scale of 1 to 50, with higher numbers indicating better performance. Assume that Company X gives the performance evaluation for two years.

    Evaluation 1: The first administration was in 2009 and the data was normally distributed with a mean of 30 and a standard deviation of 5.

    Evaluation 2:The second administration, to the same employees, was in 2010. This time, the evaluation data is normally distributed with a mean of 35 and a standard deviation of 2.5.




    Jose earned a 40 on Evaluation 1. He would need to score [blank_start]40[blank_end] on Evaluation 2 to be doing equally as well.
    1. A40
  3. 3Company X uses a yearly performance evaluation for all its employees. This instrument rates the employee on a scale of 1 to 50, with higher numbers indicating better performance. Assume that Company X gives the performance evaluation for two years.

    Evaluation 1: The first administration was in 2009 and the data was normally distributed with a mean of 30 and a standard deviation of 5.

    Evaluation 2:The second administration, to the same employees, was in 2010. This time, the evaluation data is normally distributed with a mean of 35 and a standard deviation of 2.5.



    Jenny’s score on Evaluation 1 is between 25 and 35. What percentage of
    employees has a similar score on Evaluation 1? [blank_start]68[blank_end] %
    1. A68
  4. 4Company X uses a yearly performance evaluation for all its employees. This instrument rates the employee on a scale of 1 to 50, with higher numbers indicating better performance. Assume that Company X gives the performance evaluation for two years.

    Evaluation 1: The first administration was in 2009 and the data was normally distributed with a mean of 30 and a standard deviation of 5.

    Evaluation 2:The second administration, to the same employees, was in 2010. This time, the evaluation data is normally distributed with a mean of 35 and a standard deviation of 2.5.


    Jordan earned a 30 on both Evaluation 1 and Evaluation 2.

    Comparatively, which evaluation did he do better on?
    1. Aevaluation 1
    2. Bevaluation 2
    3. Cperformance is equal on the two evaluations
  5. 5Company X uses a yearly performance evaluation for all its employees. This instrument rates the employee on a scale of 1 to 50, with higher numbers indicating better performance. Assume that Company X gives the performance evaluation for two years.

    Evaluation 1: The first administration was in 2009 and the data was normally distributed with a mean of 30 and a standard deviation of 5.

    Evaluation 2:The second administration, to the same employees, was in 2010. This time, the evaluation data is normally distributed with a mean of 35 and a standard deviation of 2.5.

    Susan earned a 33 on Evaluation 1. Her Z-score for Evaluation 1 is [blank_start].6[blank_end]

    Susan earned a 33 on Evaluation 2. Her Z-score for Evaluation 2 is [blank_start]-.8[blank_end]
    1. A.6
    2. B-.8
  6. 6Company X uses a yearly performance evaluation for all its employees. This instrument rates the employee on a scale of 1 to 50, with higher numbers indicating better performance. Assume that Company X gives the performance evaluation for two years.

    Evaluation 1: The first administration was in 2009 and the data was normally distributed with a mean of 30 and a standard deviation of 5.

    Evaluation 2:The second administration, to the same employees, was in 2010. This time, the evaluation data is normally distributed with a mean of 35 and a standard deviation of 2.5.

    Jesus’ score on Evaluation 2 is between one and two standard deviations below the mean. Therefore, his score falls between a low of [blank_start]30[blank_end] and a high of [blank_start]32.5[blank_end]
    1. A30
    2. B32.5
  7. 7Company X uses a yearly performance evaluation for all its employees. This instrument rates the employee on a scale of 1 to 50, with higher numbers indicating better performance. Assume that Company X gives the performance evaluation for two years.

    Evaluation 1: The first administration was in 2009 and the data was normally distributed with a mean of 30 and a standard deviation of 5.

    Evaluation 2:The second administration, to the same employees, was in 2010. This time, the evaluation data is normally distributed with a mean of 35 and a standard deviation of 2.5.


    Steve earned a 30 on Evaluation 1. What percentage of employees did
    worse than Steve on Evaluation 1? [blank_start]50[blank_end] %
    1. A50
  8. 8Sixty undergraduate students at UC Davis were pre-screened using a survey to measure their self-esteem. From the results of that survey, the researcher selected the 20 individuals that had the highest scores on self-esteem (High Self-Esteem Group) and the 20 individuals that had the lowest scores on self-esteem (Low Self-Esteem Group) to participate in the study.

    The participants in each group were then randomly assigned to either receive positive or negative feedback about the clothes they were wearing on the day of the study from a female confederate (i.e., the style, quality, or look of the participants' outfit). The confederate left the room. The participants were then asked if they liked the confederate. Participants indicated how much they like the confederate on 9-point scale, with higher numbers indicating more liking.

    High Self-Esteem Low Self-Esteem
    Positive Feedback 6, 9, 9, 7, 8, 8, 7, 7, 9, 8 2, 3, 4, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2,
    Negative Feedback 3, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 7, 8, 7, 6, 9, 8, 8, 9, 7, 7



    One of the predictor variables is a participant variable. What is the participant variable?
    1. Aself-esteem
    2. Bfeedback
    3. Clikability
  9. 9Sixty undergraduate students at UC Davis were pre-screened using a survey to measure their self-esteem. From the results of that survey, the researcher selected the 20 individuals that had the highest scores on self-esteem (High Self-Esteem Group) and the 20 individuals that had the lowest scores on self-esteem (Low Self-Esteem Group) to participate in the study.

    The participants in each group were then randomly assigned to either receive positive or negative feedback about the clothes they were wearing on the day of the study from a female confederate (i.e., the style, quality, or look of the participants' outfit). The confederate left the room. The participants were then asked if they liked the confederate. Participants indicated how much they like the confederate on 9-point scale, with higher numbers indicating more liking.

    High Self-Esteem Low Self-Esteem
    Positive Feedback 6, 9, 9, 7, 8, 8, 7, 7, 9, 8 2, 3, 4, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2,
    Negative Feedback 3, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 7, 8, 7, 6, 9, 8, 8, 9, 7, 7


    One of the predictor variables was manipulated and is an independent variable. What is the independent variable?
    1. Aself-esteem
    2. Bfeedback
    3. Clikability
  10. 10For the following questions, consider this data set: Sixty undergraduate students at UC Davis were pre-screened using a survey to measure their self-esteem. From the results of that survey, the researcher selected the 20 individuals that had the highest scores on self-esteem (High Self-Esteem Group) and the 20 individuals that had the lowest scores on self-esteem (Low Self-Esteem Group) to participate in the study.

    The participants in each group were then randomly assigned to either receive positive or negative feedback about the clothes they were wearing on the day of the study from a female confederate (i.e., the style, quality, or look of the participants' outfit). The confederate left the room. The participants were then asked if they liked the confederate. Participants indicated how much they like the confederate on 9-point scale, with higher numbers indicating more liking.

    High Self-Esteem Low Self-Esteem
    Positive Feedback 6, 9, 9, 7, 8, 8, 7, 7, 9, 8 2, 3, 4, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2,
    Negative Feedback 3, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 7, 8, 7, 6, 9, 8, 8, 9, 7, 7


    dependent variable?
    1. Afeedback
    2. Blikability
    3. Cself-esteem

Informationen

Beschreibung
41 Psychology 041 (Final) Quiz am Worksheet 7, erstellt von Olivia Tait am 03/06/2016.
Sprache
English
Aufrufe
0
Bewertung
Noch keine Bewertungen
Bewerte dieses Quiz
Bewerte dieses Quiz

Feedback

Worum geht es?

Wie gefällt dir das neue Design?

Dein Eindruck