Mindmap
Critical Thinking
Inhalt der Mindmap
Critical Thinking
Common Rules
- Mention : "............"
- Bold and Red Type : Important Technical Terms
- Underline = Emphasis
Expressions (>= 1 word)
- Sentences : Grammartically Correct Sentences
- Proposition (Have T/F)
- 1 Proposition
- Literally T/F
- Kenneth Lee is a girl (Literally False)
- Logically Possible / impossible
- Kenneth Lee is a girl (Logically Possible)
- Patent (直接矛盾) (e.g. Big Ben is a tower and not a tower
- Latent (間接矛盾) (e.g. Big Ben is a tower and not a building)
- Literally T/F
- 2 or more Propositions
- Logically Consistent or not
- Consistent
- Some donkeys have attacked human. Some have not
- The winning ticket is 240. Kelly holds 239. She holds the winning ticket
- Inconsistent
- Frank defeated all participants in the race
- Consistent
- Logically Consistent or not
- 1 Proposition
- Questions
- Different sentences can express the same Prop.
- I hit Sam
- Sam was hit by me
- Different prop. can be expressed by the same sentence
- Hedonist : Happiness is the end of life (Purpose of Life)
- Ascetic : Happiness is the end of life (Finisihing of life)
- Analytic Sentences (T/F merely in the virtue of its meaning)
- True Analytic Sentence
- Absolute Vaccuity
- Use a true analytic sentence to provide empirical info.
- How can you be the top of class ? Just by scoring the highest in class!
- My mother is a woman
- Definitions
- Definiendum (被定義項)
- Definiens (定義項)
- Bad Definiens
- Too Wide
- Too Narrow
- Apple is a Red and Juicy Fruit
- Sexual Harrassment : Making a woman feel angry
- Good Definiens
- Not Too Wide / Narrow
- No vicious Cycles
- Bachelor = Bachelor
- Definiens not as obsure as the definiendum
- Supplementary absolute self = adjunct unconditional age
- Bad Definiens
- Implicatures
- Conversational Implicature
- Maxims
- Quality / Quantity / Relevance / Manner
- Cancellable
- Can you be my girlfriend? I have a boyfriend already
- Maxims
- Conventional Implicature
- Non-Cancellable
- Colored Expression (e.g. He is stubborn, but I dont have hard feelings on him)
- Literal Meaning
- Non-Cancellable
- Conversational Implicature
- Absolute Vaccuity
- False Analytic Sentence
- A boy is a girl
- True Analytic Sentence
- Synthetic Sentences (Informative + Need Add. info. to determine T/F)
- True Synthetic Sentences
- Some People has drawn triangles
- Relative Vaccuity
- Use a true synthetic sentence to convey a redundant empirical Info.
- What do you think of the DSE exam ? I think all candidates want to get good grades and enter university
- False Synthetic Sentences
- No one has drawn triangles
- True Synthetic Sentences
- Proposition (Have T/F)
- Sentences : Grammartically Correct Sentences
Insufficient Clarity
- Vague (e.g. Fat, Hot)
- Meaning Incomplete (e.g. Tom's height is above average)
- Ambiguous Expression
- Semantic Ambiguity (Ambiguity due to meaning of the sentence)
- Happiness is the end of life (Purpose / Ceasing of life)
- Syntactic Ambiguity (Ambiguity due to the way of terms combined)
- 兒子生性病母倍感安慰
- Phonological Ambiguity (Ambiguity due to the pronunciation of the word)
- there - their / here - hear / Plane - Plain
- Semantic Ambiguity (Ambiguity due to meaning of the sentence)
Dispute
- Verbal Dispute
- Disagreement due to the different uses of an expression
- Vague, Meaning-incomplete and ambiguous expressions cause verbal disputes
- Productive Scholar / Fat / Wait at the bank
- Genuine Dispute
- Disagreement due to different understandings of facts
- Verbal Dispute
Uses of Expressions
- Cognitive Use
- Informative Use (e.g. Synthetic Sentences
- Non-Informative Use (e.g. Analytic Sentences)
- Non-cognitive Use
- Expressive Use (e.g. Fuck You)
- Directive Use (e.g. Shut Up)
- Other Uses
- Mixed Use of Expressions
- Your friends have all got married
- Informative Use
- Expressive Use : Impatience
- Directive Use : Please get married ASAP
- Your friends have all got married
- Cognitive Use
Logical Relations
- Contrary (正對立) (Both True : NOT OK // Both False : OK
- All donkeys are naughty. All donkeys are obedient
- Subcontrary (次對立) (Both True : OK // Both False : NOT OK)
- Kelly said that there are alients. Kelly said that there are not aliens
- Contradictory (Both True / False : NO OK)
- There are aliens. There are no aliens
- Entailment
- Logically Entail (If P is TRUE, Q must be TRUE)
- P : Peter is Running Q : Peter is moving his body)
- Exceptions (Implications)
- Some dogs are black. Some dogs are not black
- Logically Stronger (P entails Q, but Q does NOT entails P)
- P : An astrologer proved that there are UFOs Q : There are UFOs
- Logically Equivalent (P entails Q and Q entails P)
- Peter and I are happy. Peter is happy and I am happy
- Logically Entail (If P is TRUE, Q must be TRUE)
- Contrary (正對立) (Both True : NOT OK // Both False : OK
Argument
- Premise
- Indicators : Since / for / In view of
- Hidden Premises
- Holding Hands Rule (Key terms in Premise must appear in conclusion)
- Ronny is a politician. Politicians are selfish. Ronny is selfish
- Rabbit Rule (Key Terms in Conclusion must appear in Premise)
- An intruder entered the house. The dog hadn't barked. If the dog didn't know the intruder, then it would have barked. (Hidden Premise). The dog knew the intruder
- Holding Hands Rule (Key terms in Premise must appear in conclusion)
- Conclusion
- Indicators : Therefore / Hence / As a Result
- Supporting Relation
- Non-Arguments
- Reports
- Explanation
- I ate your apple since I'm hungry
- Conditionals (If-then Propositions)
- Unsupported Claims (e.g. 2 + 2 = 6)
- Argument Mapping
- Use arrows to unpack reasoning
- Use Complete Sentences
- Differentiate independent premise and co-premise
- If X is False, the extent to Y supports the conclusion decreases >>> Co-premise
- Bella is a husky. All huskies are dogs. So Bella is a dog
- If X is False, the extent to Y supports the conclusion decreases >>> Co-premise
- Make hidden conclusion and premises explicit
- Deductive Arguments
- Valid Arguments
- When all Premises are TRUE, the conclusion must be true
- Premises logically entials Argument
- Sound Argument (The Premises are literally TRUE)
- Non-defeasible
- Valid Arguments
- Inductive Arguments
- Strong Arguments
- If All Premises are TRUE, it's very probable that the argument is TRUE
- Defeasible
- Adding Premises will affect the strength of the argument
- Cogent Arguments (Premises are TRUE as well)
- Strong Arguments
- Good Argument
- Epistemic Condition (Reasonable Premises)
- Logical Condition (Premises support the conclusion in a valid way)
- NO Invalid Arguments
- NO Weak Arguments
- No Circular Arguments
- NO Irrelevant Arguments
- Not to be defeated
- Premise
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Critical Thinking, erstellt von Wayne Hui am 14/10/2018.
- Erstellt von
- Wayne Hui
- Aufrufe
- 3
- Bewertung