Mindmap
THE OUTCOME OF THE INDULGENCE CONTROVERSY & LUTHER'S PROTEST
Inhalt der Mindmap
THE OUTCOME OF THE INDULGENCE CONTROVERSY & LUTHER'S PROTEST
Wasn't intentionally attacking the authority of Pope and purgatory in general
Affected powerful people; Archbishop of Mainz, Pope Leo X, Dominican friar
- Pope Leo left the Augustinian order deal with Luther - Staupitz sympathised & protected him
- Pope Leo X then ordered Luther to Rome - denied
- Issue then settled in Germany
- Prierias (papal theologian) prepared a case against Luther - to deny the authority of the Pope to issue indulgences was heresy
- Luther rejected this, moving him further away from the orthodox view
- Prierias (papal theologian) prepared a case against Luther - to deny the authority of the Pope to issue indulgences was heresy
- Issue then settled in Germany
- Pope Leo X then ordered Luther to Rome - denied
- Pope Leo left the Augustinian order deal with Luther - Staupitz sympathised & protected him
Church worried about what the attack had on the financial result
- Laity delighted with Luther's views
95 Theses translated to German (originally Latin) & spread across Germany & Switzerland
Pamphlets produced - Dominican order produced a pamphlet supporting indulgences, Luther fired back with 'a Sermon on Indulgences' (bestseller)
MEETING AT AUGSBURG, OCT 1518
- Cardinal Cajetan represented the Pope
- Aim; to get Luther to admit that he was wrong
- Luther denied the Popes authority over indulgences
- Luther said that the Church doctrines need to be tested against the scriptures
- Luther was seen as an 'honest german'
- As he was popular, Cajetan couldn't arrest him or take him away from Germany without causing public outcry
THE LEIPZIG DEBATE, JULY 1519
- Luther said that there should be a general council of the Church which would have the supreme authority
- Luther concluded that it was only 'faith alone that saves' NOT good works aswell
- Pope left Luther alone in 1519 because he wanted Fredrick to vote for his candidate in the imperial election
- Public debate at Leipzig Uni (Luther vs. John Eck) - lasted 18days
- Eck was a Dominican friar who wanted to correct the abuses of the Church but was dedicated to defend the teachings of the Church
- Best debater in Germany
- Eck was a Dominican friar who wanted to correct the abuses of the Church but was dedicated to defend the teachings of the Church
- Forced in a corner, Luther condemned himself - faith alone saves, scripture alone is what to believe in, authority of the Pope was based on a lie (no evidence in Bible)
- Basically agreeing with the views the heretic, Jan Hus had
- Eck produced the 'bull of excommunication' in June 1520
- 41 of Luther's views was heretical
- Forbidden to read his works (some burned in public)
- 60 days to recant
- Forbidden to write any new works & preach
- Serious resistance in the North & central Germany
- Duke George published the bull in Leipzig - ripped down in the night
- 10th December, students of Wittenberg burned copies of the canon law, anti-Lutheran books (Luther attended and dramatically burned a copy of the papal bull)
- January 1521 - Luther's excommunication finalised
THE DIET OF WORMS (JAN-APRIL 1521)
- Charles V elected HRE in 1519
- Gave Luther a hearing
- Pope Leo X wanted Charles V to enforce Luther's condemnation - But Charles couldn't upset the princes who voted for him
- Public was pro-Luther that arresting him would of been difficult
- Pope Leo X wanted Charles V to enforce Luther's condemnation - But Charles couldn't upset the princes who voted for him
- Gave Luther a hearing
- Charles offered safe conduct (Jan Hus promised the same, but promise had not been kept - Luther had too much support to be in danger)
- Allowed to return to Wittenberg safely - 'Kidnapped' & taken to Elector Fredrick's Wartburg Castle where he remained for the next 10months
- Able to produce pamphlets + translated the New Testament into German
- Allowed to return to Wittenberg safely - 'Kidnapped' & taken to Elector Fredrick's Wartburg Castle where he remained for the next 10months
- Highest in the land was present
- Pointless?
- Did not explain/debate his views
- Asked if the writings was his & if he was prepared to give up his opinions
- 'I cannot & will not retract anything for to act against our conscience is neither safe nor open to us' - Luther
- Luther declared an outlaw - anyone who gave him shelter or supported him, was said to be aiding heresy
- Charles V elected HRE in 1519
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- AS level History (Hackett) (2.4 Luther's protest (1517-21)) Mindmap am THE OUTCOME OF THE INDULGENCE CONTROVERSY & LUTHER'S PROTEST, erstellt von dolce-n-banana am 02/02/2014.
- Erstellt von
- dolce-n-banana
- Aufrufe
- 75
- Tags
- Bewertung