Mindmap
Political Parties UK
Inhalt der Mindmap
Political Parties UK
Party Funding
- Decline of party membership in 80s&90s = damaging impact for party finance
- Labour prev funded by Trade Unions
- Blair&Kinnock efforts to reduce trade unions damaged Labours funds
- Began to rely on wealthy backers
- Blair&Kinnock efforts to reduce trade unions damaged Labours funds
- Cons prev funded by wealthy business interests
- Labour prev funded by Trade Unions
- Controversy
- Rise of individual donations in 90s = view that political influence could be bought
- Led to calls for regulation
- EXAMPLE: Bernie Eccleston's (F1 tycoon) £1mil donation to Lab = Lab making F1 exempt from tabacco ad ban at sport events
- Rise of individual donations in 90s = view that political influence could be bought
- Regulation
- PPERA (2000)
- Imposed overall limit on party spending in GE campaigns (£30,000 per constituency)
- Est. spending limit for devolved body & EU Parl elections
- Req parties to declare all donations over £5,000 to Electoral Commission
- Sought to make parties less reliant on wealthy individuals
- PPEA (2009)
- Build on PPERA regs
- Restricted donations from non-UK residents
- Reduced donation declaration from £5,000 to £1,500
- Imposed tighter regs on spending by candidates in elec run up
- Allowed Electoral Commission to investigate cases & impose fines
- PPERA (2000)
- Sources of Party funding
- Membership fees
- Fall in membership = reduces income
- Small donations from members
- Fall in membership = lower number
- Large donations from donors
- Significant income esp. for Cons
- Can be controversial
- Trade Unions (Labour)
- Value reduced by funding challenges in Trade Union Act 2016
- State funding
- Designed to counter financial advantage of gov party or large fund parties
- Membership fees
- State funding
- Short money
- State funds paid to opposition parties in HoC
- Pays for admin costs
- Enables effective scrutiny of gov
- Pays for admin costs
- Available to opp parties who get 2 seats or 1 seat and 150,000 votes nationally at GE
- 2014-15 Labour got over £6m
- State funds paid to opposition parties in HoC
- Cranborne money
- State funds paid to opposition parties in HoL
- Pays admin costs
- Enables effective scrutiny
- 2014-15 Labour got £500,000
- State funds paid to opposition parties in HoL
- Policy Development Grants
- Any party with sitting MP granted share of £2m annual fund to help policy dev
- Funding for election campaigns
- State subsidies given go parties during election campaign to help with costs
- E.g. TV broadcasts & postage costs
- State subsidies given go parties during election campaign to help with costs
- Should Parties be state funded?
- YES
- Or else they'll be funded by wealthy individuals&interest groups
- Would allow politicians to focus on representing constituencies rather than courting potential donors
- Parties e.g. Lib Dems compete on equal financial footing funding would be on membership or electoral performance
- NO
- Taxpayers should have to fund parties they oppose
- Politicians could become isolated from real world issues if denied access from interest groups
- Parties will always have unequal resources e.g. membership levels & human/material resources
- YES
- Short money
- Decline of party membership in 80s&90s = damaging impact for party finance
Party structure & membership
- Conservatives
- 2018: 124,000 members
- Local & national structure
- Each const. has Cons Association - help run campaigns
- Welsh&Scot Cons party within UK party
- 1922 Committee made up of backbench Cons MPs
- Cons Campaign HQ located in London, HQ of party
- Board of the Cons party = governing body of party
- National Cons Convention makes decisions for voluntary party - const association chairs, regional offers, reps from youth&women org attend
- Choosing party leaders
- 1. MPs vote on candidates, top 2 presented to rest of party
- 2. All party members vote on top 2, one vote system, every vote =
- NOTE: May not voted for by party membs bc rival withdrew leaving her unopposed
- Labour
- 2017: 550,000 mebers
- Local & national structure
- Welsh&Scot Lab party within UK party
- National Executive Committee (NEC) = governing body of party
- The Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) consists of Lab MPs
- 14 Trade unions affiliated with Lab
- Many socialist societies/groups also affiliated
- Each constituency has Constituency Labour Party (CLP) - smaller local branches choose local council candidates
- Choosing party leaders
- 1. Candidate must secure nom of 15% of Parl Lab Party to qualify for ballot
- 2. Party members & registered supporters vote on one vote basis under AV system
- Registered voters introduced in 2015 were controversial, people who paid £3 could vote, raised to £25 in 2016 to prevent elections being hijacked
- 2. Party members & registered supporters vote on one vote basis under AV system
- 1. Candidate must secure nom of 15% of Parl Lab Party to qualify for ballot
- Lib Dems
- 2018: 99,000 members
- Local & national structure
- Lib Dems use federal structure
- Members belong to local party, regional party and nation party of Eng, Wales or Scot
- Federal Board = gov body of Lib Dems, brings together national parties
- Parliamentary party in HoC make up of Lib Dem MPs
- Members can also join Specified Associated Orgs (SAOs) with specific focus/identity e.g. Ethnic Minority Liberal Democrats and can submit motions to party conference
- Choosing party leaders
- 1. Candidate must secure nom of 20 local parties or 200 party members to qualify for ballot
- 2. Party members vote on one vote basis under AV system
- 1. Candidate must secure nom of 20 local parties or 200 party members to qualify for ballot
- Conservatives
Choosing Parliamentary candidates (MPs)
- 3 main parties use similar procedure
- 1. Candidate approved by central org of party
- 2. Local party selects candidates from central party list
- 3. Constituency members vote to select parl candidate
- L, C & LD traditionally struggle with diversity of candidates
- Labour = All women shortlists, introduced 1993
- led to 101 female Lab MPs in 1997
- Conservatives = priority lists, public hustings and open primaries
- Priority lists = candidates prepared from priority candidates e.g. minorities - candidates offered to local party when drawing up shortlist
- Public Hustings = events where Parl candidates answer Q's on policy in front of public & party members
- Open primaries = elections where any registered voter can choose to vote, not just party members
- Labour = All women shortlists, introduced 1993
- 3 main parties use similar procedure
Establishing Party Policy
- Conservatives
- Top down process; leaders team mostly decide what goes in manifesto
- Major 1992: "It was all me"
- Delegates at party conference don't vote on policy
- Top down process; leaders team mostly decide what goes in manifesto
- Labour
- National Policy Forum (reps from across party) agree direction of policy&arrange policy commission
- Policies voted on at party conference
- Leader can use personal authority to win support of policies at conference
- Lib Dems
- Federal Policy Committee (mix of MPs and other members) dev policy to be put forward at party conference held x2 a year
- Any member can make policy proposal to party conference
- Conference votes on all policies and all members can vote
- Conservatives
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Political Parties UK, erstellt von beth !! am 27/03/2019.
- Erstellt von
- beth !!
- Aufrufe
- 60
- Tags
- Bewertung