Zusammenfassung der Ressource
The 3 Approaches to Argument
- The Classical Approach
Anmerkungen:
- 6. Conclusion
- summary
- can have pathos
- 1. Intro
- Hooks the reader
- 2. State Your Case
- Tell any key background information
- 5. Proof
- use evidence and examples.
- The body. Logos, pathos,
- and ethos is used
- 3. Proposition
Anmerkungen:
- This is the thesis statement
- State which side you're on
- State the points that will..
- support your argument.
- 4. Rebuttal
- State opposing side
- then say why yours is better
- Point out weaknesses
- The Toulmin Approach
Anmerkungen:
- Stephen Toulmin made this approach
- 1. Claim
- Your position on the case.
- 3. Warrant
- This connects the data and the claim.
- Most of the time you have to infer the warrant
- it isn't just given.
- it shows that the data
being used is relevant.
- 4. Backing
Anmerkungen:
- this answers other questions that could be brought up to falsify the claim.
- GASCAP
- 3. Sign
- an idea that one thing is influenced by
another, like falling dominoes.
- 4. Casual
- Cause and effect. An event (cause)
is the result or influenced a certain
factor.
- 5. Authority
- Is the certain n factor a reliable source. Is it an
authoritative source and what interest does it have.
- 2. Analogy
- When there are similarities between
two events and deductions are made
based on the similarities
- 6. Principle
- Using a principle that the majority agrees
on in which you can apply a situation to.
- 1. Generalization
- a picked sample is a good
example and holds for a bigger
population
- 2. Data
Anmerkungen:
- The proof in the classical approach and the data in the Toulminapproach are very similar. They both use evidence and examples to support the case stated.
- 3. Warrant
- Supporting evidence
- 5. Proof
Anmerkungen:
- The proof in the classical approach and the data in the Toulminapproach are very similar. They both use evidence and examples to support the case stated.
- Includes the reasons for the claim
- 5. Qualifier
- This is how strong the data
is to the warrant.
- if the data only applies to some
people then it's a weak qualifier.
- 6. Rebuttal
- this is falsifying the opposing side
- 4. Rebuttal
- The Rogerian Approach
Anmerkungen:
- Carl Rogers made the Rogerian approach
- 1. An Intro
- Define the issue
- 2. A Neutral Summary of Opposing Belief
- You know and understand the opposing
side's point of view.
- 3. Neutral Statement and explanation of your Belief
- State your position and the circumstance
which it applies.
- 5. Proposal
- A resolve to the issue that has the interest of both positions. Or a position that
would benefit the other.
- 4. Analysis
- What do the two positions have in common
and what goals and values do they share.