Mindmap
Interviews
Inhalt der Mindmap
Interviews
Unstructured interviews
- Informal
- General talk where interviewers ask questions based on research
- No written questions
- Ethnographic
- Depth and detail
- Qualitative data
- Strengths
- Respondant is centre of research
- Flexible
- Encourages people to open up
- Gain empathy
- Get rapport
- Weaknesses
- Difficult to analyse
- Less representative
- More expensive
- Interviewer effect
- Quirk and lelliot: Life of a psyciatric ward
Group interviews
- Unstructured interviews
- Groups instead of individuals
- Usually for children to take away pressure
- Strengths
- Truer image of behaviour
- Can see how people react in groups
- Multiple opinions
- Weaknesses
- May not get everyone's opinions
- People with different opinions may not want to speak out
- interviewer effect
Semi-structured interviews
- Closed and open questions
- Can stray from written questions
- Try to add depth and detail
- Try to assess the truth
- Quantitative and qualitative data
- Probing
- Strengths
- Depth and detail
- Can asses truth
- Add in questions if needed
- Weaknesses
- Can take time
- Not reliable
- Archer (2003) used them her interviews of muslims
Roger Gomm
- Demand charecteristics
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Interviews, erstellt von Sophie Roydhouse am 23/03/2016.
- Erstellt von
- Sophie Roydhouse
- Aufrufe
- 2
- Bewertung