Mindmap
Soviet motives for, and moves towards, Peaceful Coexistence
Inhalt der Mindmap
Soviet motives for, and moves towards, Peaceful Coexistence
Peaceful Coexistence
- Shortly after Stalin death, Beria tried to forge better relationship with West by proposing reunified, neutral Germany.
- His initiative was ruined in June 53 by Soviet repression of anti comm protests in East Germany
- 2 months later, Malenkov called for a 'new course' in foreign policy, which focused on peaceful coexistence with the West
- Malenkov not convinced that a capitalist-communist war was inevitable
- Consequently, USSR could devote resources to living standards and developing consumer industries
- K initially opposed the new course, but once Malenkov had been removed, adopted it under the name of 'Peaceful Coexistence'
- Consequently, USSR could devote resources to living standards and developing consumer industries
- Malenkov not convinced that a capitalist-communist war was inevitable
- 2 months later, Malenkov called for a 'new course' in foreign policy, which focused on peaceful coexistence with the West
- His initiative was ruined in June 53 by Soviet repression of anti comm protests in East Germany
- Summary - Peaceful Coexistence was a Soviet doctrine that was put forward in the 1950s - that argued peaceful relations with the West were possible
- Georgi Malenkov 1902-1988
- Succeeded Stalin as party PM in 1953
- forced by other members of collective leadership to hand over party post to K
- 1953-54 M tried to ease tensions with West and boost Soviet consumer industries
- Was easily outmanoeuvred by K, losing the premiership in 55 and his seat on the Politburo in 1957
- with his political career over - Malenkov was sent to Kazakhstan to manage a hydroelectric plant
- Was easily outmanoeuvred by K, losing the premiership in 55 and his seat on the Politburo in 1957
- 1953-54 M tried to ease tensions with West and boost Soviet consumer industries
- forced by other members of collective leadership to hand over party post to K
- Succeeded Stalin as party PM in 1953
- Shortly after Stalin death, Beria tried to forge better relationship with West by proposing reunified, neutral Germany.
Why did the USSR pursue Peaceful Coexistence?
- Stalin's death and the emergence of a more progressive Soviet leadership are 2 key reasons
- Soviet leadership believing in the inevitable triumph of communism
- As Marxists, the Soviet politburo genuinely believed that communism would inevitably triumph over capitalism
- Sooner or later, the West would be overwhelmed by an economic slump - but until then the USSR could bide its time and avoid any damaging conflicts
- K summed up this position by saying "Peaceful Coexistence between difference systems of government is possible, but peaceful coexistence between different ideologies is not"
- Sooner or later, the West would be overwhelmed by an economic slump - but until then the USSR could bide its time and avoid any damaging conflicts
- As Marxists, the Soviet politburo genuinely believed that communism would inevitably triumph over capitalism
- K confident that USSR's economic output would soon overtake West
- 1956 - claimed that, since 1929, Soviet industrial production had risen by 1.95% - Corresponding figure for USA was 1.34%
- K also favoured P.C due to what he called 'the disintegration of the imperialist colonial system'
- In his view - newly decolonised states and national liberation movements would reject the imperialist West and look to USSR for support
- K also favoured P.C due to what he called 'the disintegration of the imperialist colonial system'
- 1956 - claimed that, since 1929, Soviet industrial production had risen by 1.95% - Corresponding figure for USA was 1.34%
- Consolidation of Influence
- By end of 40s, both sides had consolidated their respective spheres of interest in Europe
- Each also tacitly recognised the other's area of influence
- This gave the superpowers a greater sense of security - made them more willing to negotiated
- Each also tacitly recognised the other's area of influence
- By end of 40s, both sides had consolidated their respective spheres of interest in Europe
- Implications of the arms race
- Economic and military implications of the nuclear arms race, which gathered pace in 40s, provided another reason for P.C
- Cost and sheer destructive power of nuclear weapons had sobering effect on superpowers
- As K said 'There are only two ways - either peaceful coexistence or the most destructive war in history. There is no third way'
- Cost and sheer destructive power of nuclear weapons had sobering effect on superpowers
- Economic and military implications of the nuclear arms race, which gathered pace in 40s, provided another reason for P.C
Key Measures of Soviet Peaceful Coexistence
- End of Korean War July 1953
- After Stalin's death - new leadership moved rapidly to bringing fighting in Korea to an end
- Change of policy abandoned Stalin's hardline approach of 1952 of continuing the conflict
- decision influenced by Soviet concerns of the economic impact of prolonging the war
- Represented clear sign that new govt wanted to manage affairs in a different way to Stalin
- As Malenkov put it 'there is no dispute or outstanding issue, which cannot be settled peacefully'
- Armistice was negotiated along 38th parallel in July 53
- As Malenkov put it 'there is no dispute or outstanding issue, which cannot be settled peacefully'
- Represented clear sign that new govt wanted to manage affairs in a different way to Stalin
- decision influenced by Soviet concerns of the economic impact of prolonging the war
- Change of policy abandoned Stalin's hardline approach of 1952 of continuing the conflict
- After Stalin's death - new leadership moved rapidly to bringing fighting in Korea to an end
- Cuts in the Red Army (from mid 1950s)
- K reduced conventional forces partly to convince the West of his peaceful intentions
- 2nd half of 50s, size of Red Army decreased from 5.8mil to 3.7mil men
- Further cuts of 33% were announced in early 60s
- K also did it to save on military costs - was convinced nuclear weapons afforded USSR much better protection
- Further cuts of 33% were announced in early 60s
- 2nd half of 50s, size of Red Army decreased from 5.8mil to 3.7mil men
- K reduced conventional forces partly to convince the West of his peaceful intentions
- Austrian State Treaty 1955
- Like Germany, Austria had been placed under joint occupation by the big 4 in 1945
- Subsequent talks between the big 4 failed to settle Austria's future
- USSR extracted resources from their Austrian zone and USA secretly rearmed their zone and supported it with Marshall Aid
- After overcoming Malenkov's resistance in 54- K was ready to accept a neutral rather than divided Austria
- Hoped west would see this as proof of his willingness to negotiate on key issues
- Result was Austrian state treaty of 1955
- Agreement signed by big 4 - removed all foreign troops and guaranteed Austrian independence and neutrality
- treaty paved way for Geneva summit of 55 and marked first occasion since 45 that Soviet troops had willingly left any part of Europe
- Agreement signed by big 4 - removed all foreign troops and guaranteed Austrian independence and neutrality
- Result was Austrian state treaty of 1955
- Hoped west would see this as proof of his willingness to negotiate on key issues
- After overcoming Malenkov's resistance in 54- K was ready to accept a neutral rather than divided Austria
- USSR extracted resources from their Austrian zone and USA secretly rearmed their zone and supported it with Marshall Aid
- Subsequent talks between the big 4 failed to settle Austria's future
- Like Germany, Austria had been placed under joint occupation by the big 4 in 1945
- Soviet withdrawal from Finland 1956
- Finnish Soviet treaty 1947 - formally ended conflict which had taken place during WW2
- Under its terms - Finland handed over border territory and $300million in reparations to USSR
- USSR also given 50 year lease to the Porkkala peninsula where it kept a naval base
- K decided to remove Soviet influence from Porkkala - was handed back in 1956
- K wanted West to see this as further evidence that USSR wanted a more constructive relationship
- however, Porkkala did have little strategic value and Finland pledged to remain neutral and outside NATO
- K wanted West to see this as further evidence that USSR wanted a more constructive relationship
- K decided to remove Soviet influence from Porkkala - was handed back in 1956
- USSR also given 50 year lease to the Porkkala peninsula where it kept a naval base
- Under its terms - Finland handed over border territory and $300million in reparations to USSR
- Finnish Soviet treaty 1947 - formally ended conflict which had taken place during WW2
- Other Soviet Initiatives
- 1953 - settled border disputes with Turkey and Iran - reestablished relations with Greece - formally recognised Israel
- 1955 - recognised West Germany and restored relations with Tito's Yugoslavia
- End of Korean War July 1953
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- A-Levels Cold War (Post-Stalin Thaw) Mindmap am Soviet motives for, and moves towards, Peaceful Coexistence, erstellt von jacksearle am 15/04/2014.
- Erstellt von
- jacksearle
- Aufrufe
- 87
- Bewertung