Mind map
MfAD
Map content
MfAD
- reflects the degree of uncertainty of the best actuarial estimate
Considerations:
- Knowledge
- Frequency and Severity
- Contract Duration
- Prob Dstr
- Experience
Reasons for fluctionation
- Error of estimations
- Insufficient or unrelaliable historical data
- Future conditions differ from the past
- Unanticipated Inluences
- Statistical fluctuations
Stochastic
- Key Concepts
- Risk Distribution
- probability of uncertain outcome will arrive
- normal distribution
- Why good
- symmetric same prob for good or bad news
- risk measures only with s.d, confidence level or CTE
- Central limit theorem
- sum of any set of homogeneous and uncorrelated risks will approximate the normal distribution as the number of risks increases to infinity
- Not good for insurance
- not enough risk
- individual risk are seldom sysmetric
- correlated with inflation, environment, court decision
- Why good
- Standard Deviation
- Coefficient of variation (CV)
- s.d/mean
- Skewness
- Ins. + (many 0 claims)
- longer to settle, bigger skew
- Settlement Rate
- Risk Distribution
- Model
- loss distribution using simulation
- assumptions, method and approximation are reasonable for the contracts
- loss distribution using simulation
- Product
- Stop loss reinsurance
- Catastrophe
- credit, warranty, and mortgage guarantee insurance
- highly correlated with inflation, unemployment rate
- long tail: prof liab
- Extreme Event problem: low credibility data
- weighted average
- weighted averages of possible scenarios of relevant extreme events (usually those not reflected routinely or at all in the available data),
- judgemental analysis
- of particular operational or risk issues (e.g., new claims or underwriting systems or procedures).
- weighted average
- Extreme Event problem: low credibility data
- Quantile approcha
- multiple S.D
- simple and pracitcal
- percentile, VaR, Confidence level
- most common
- P(actual < mean + margin) = p
- depends only on the shape
- Improvements: add a parameter of uncertainty for the time for reflecting time (greater for long tail)
- CTE or Trail Value at Risk
- average of outcomes that exceed Qth percentile
- a 75th percentile CTE result is the mean result of the 25% highest cost scenarios.
- weighted-average of the highest (100-Q)% of the results from stochastic simulation
- average of outcomes that exceed Qth percentile
- 2 insurance aspects
- Timing (settement pattern)
- Shape
- the risk distribution of possible outcomes around the mean value, at the reporting date, over a specified time horizon
- multiple S.D
- Key Concepts
Deterministic
- Investment (i to discount)
- Considerations
- Asset/Liab matching
- Difficult to match asset and liability
- Timing
- Error in estimating the payment pattern
- Credit
- Asset Risk
- Asset/Liab matching
- Formula
- Weighted formula
- Explicit quantification
- Considerations
- Recovery from Reinsurance
- Considerations
- Proportion
- Ceded LR Ceded Commission
- Unregistered Reins.
- Financial Situation
- Under Liquation
- Weak Fin. Conditions
- Considerations
- Development
- Considerations
- LOB
- Change in Legislation
- Long tail
- Operational
- Lack of Employees
- Lack of Guideline
- Employee turnover
- Data
- Credible
- Homogeneous
- Stable
- LOB
- Considerations
- Investment (i to discount)