Eyewitness testimony: lineups, EWT and misleading information

Page 1

Eyewitness identification

Burton et al 1990 - IAC

Bruce and Young 1986 - face recog model

Tulving 1983 - Encoding Specificity Principle

Line ups

Wells 1978 - estimator and system variables

Wells and Olson 2001 - suspect bias and general impairment

PACE (Police and Criminal Evidence Act) 1984 - guidelines re procedures e.g select place in line up, at least 8 members

Steblay 2001 - meta anal sim and seq

McQuiston-Surrett 2006 - data split

Kneller 2001 - sim line up criticism

Pike 2002 - video line ups

Wells 1978 - stress

Yerkes-Dodson 1908 - optimal performance

Christianson 1992 - criticised YDL

Deffenbacher 1994 - 3D model & meta anal on stress on EWM

Valentine and Mesout 2009 - ldn dungeon

Morgan 2004 - military

Misleading information

Loftus 1974, 78, 80, 95

Loftus 2005 - susceptibility

Bergen 2009 - mistrust own memory

McCloskey and Zaragoza - against cog

Chandler 2001 - memory trace not perm altered by misinfo

Johnson 1993 - source monitoring

Reyna and Lloyd 1997 - attribution prob

Bartlett 1932 - war of the ghosts - reconstruction of memory

Spiro and Spiro 1980 - memory distortion based on schema related to misinfo

Echterhoff 2005 - credibility warnings

Gabbert 2004 - co-witness

Patterson and Kemp 2006 - diff types of co-witness

Gabbert 2003 - normative and informative

Memory and social context

Marsh 2007 - goals

Fisher and Geiselman 1992 - cog interview

Dando 2009 - modified cog interview

Children as eye-witnesses

Goodman 2006 - lit review

Brainerd and Reyna 1990 - fuzzy trace

Gordon 2001 - verbatim and gist and kids

Gordon 2001 - stereotypes

Bottoms 2002 - socioemotional

Decision making in a jury context

Pennington and Hastie 1986 - 3 stage model

Smith 1991 - mock jurors categorization and integration of own knowledge

Tinsley 2000 - decision during trial not delib

Mathews 2004 and Tinsley 2000 - presentation of evidence

Feigenson and Dunn 2003 - tech advances