Fichas
law
Fichas del conjunto (67)
- 1SimsEverything in issue
- 2Woolmington v DPPbeyond reasonable doubt
- 3Miler v minister of pensionsbalance of probabilties
- 4M'Naghteninsanity
- 5SangPrejudicial>probative
- 6Galbraithno case to answer
- 7Warwickshallconfession exempt from hearsay = proof of crime
- 8Sharpmixed confessions
S76(1) PACE - 9Fullingunlawful exertion of authority
- 10HulbertConfession based on known facts
- 11ChatwoodConfession must be fact
- 12Loban v Rnot admissible against co-accused
- 13GunewardeneSeverance of cases
- 14Blake & Tyeunless evidence against co-accused
- 15Condron v UKeffect of legal advice
- 16MoshaidFail to mention what defence relies upon
- 17ArgentSubjective Test
- 18Leathamdoesn't matter how obtained
- 19Jeffery v Blackunless morally reprehensible
- 20Chalkleyfairness
- 21Beckfordabuse of process
not fair trial = stayed proceedings - 22Looseleyunacceptable entrapment
- 23Williams v DPPInvestigating crime
- 24DPP v Marshallundercover okay unless clear entrapment
- 25Teixeira de Casto v Portugalpreying on weakness of human nature
- 26Moore & Burrowsinitial suspicion, authorisation, necessity and unexceptional opportunity
- 27DPP v Boardmancharacter
ID defendant - 28VyeGood character
Vye direction 2 limbs: credible and ultimate issue - 29Huntergood character
have both vye limbs - 30Berrybas character of witness
criminal record affects credibility - 31Spittlebad character of accused
relevant to ID - 32R v B (E)bad character of accused
relevant to defence - 33TurnbullEW ID
judge directs for caution of circumstance - 34BowdenEW ID
recognition - 35Slaterno turnbull if witness not mistaken
- 36Capeeyewitness lies
- 37ForbesExclude under S78 PACE
breach code D - 38DodsonJury view film themselves
- 39Robertsrisk with voice ID
- 40Flynnjury compare voice themselves
- 41LUCASdeliberate false alibi
- 42Burge and Pegg4 LUCAS categories: false alibi, prosecution rely for guilt, not LUCAS when challenging credibility
- 43Singhhearsay
assertion - 44Twisthearsay
phone calls - 45Ferdinandunfit witness
- 46Cnot practice return
- 47Coughlanmissing
- 48Maher v DPPhearsay
in the interest of justice - 49Abadomhearsay
professional knowledge - 50Jacksonhearsay
lab work - 51Howe v Malkinmore reliable than usual
- 52Bedingfieldhearsay
emotionally empowered (victim) - 53AndrewsRes Gestae Test: nature of event, time, proximity, dishonest/mistaken account
- 54Edwardshearsay
declaration of actions - 55Gilfoylehearsay
declaration of state of mind - 56O'HareS114(2)(d)
circumstances circumvent - 57Al-Khawaja and Tahery v UKdangers of sole/decisive hearsay
- 58Joyce & Joycewitnesses
inconsistent statements - 59Sherrard v JacobID (turnbull), apparent age, condition, emotional value, estimate speed/distance, handwriting (Harden)
- 60Turnerknowledge outside of jury
Turner test: assistance, expertise, impartiality, reliability (Lundy) - 61Lundy v Rscientific basis/reliable
- 62KebileneReverse Burden
Article 6(2) ECHR
innocent til proven guilty - 63Salabiakureverse burden compromises presumption of innocence
- 64LambertS8 HRA
Reverse burden = downgrade to evidential burden. - 65Bagot1 small previous conviction
No special features - 66Bad character legislationCJA 03
S98-def
S101(1)(d) - relevant to matter in issue
S112 - misconduct - 67DallangherReliability