315728
The Teleologocial Argument
- For
- Paley
- Compared to a human eye
- Because of its complexity
- Because of its complexity
- Compared to a watch
- World needs a designer like a watch
- World needs a designer like a watch
- Compared to a human eye
- Darwin
- Evolution shows
intelligent design
- Science explains
evolution without
God
- Evolution shows
intelligent design
- Tennant
- Provides the basic necessities for life
- Perfect basis for life
- The world has order
- Agreed with Darwin on evolution
- Provides the basic necessities for life
- Swinburne
- Agreed with Tennant
- The world suggests design rather than chance
- Agreed with Tennant
- Brown
- Ozone layer shows evidence of design
- Protects us from UV rays
- Without it we would die
- Without it we would die
- Protects us from UV rays
- Ozone layer shows evidence of design
- Paley
- Against
- Hume
- Humans dont have
sufficient knowledge to
conclude there is only
one designer.
- Could be multiple designers
- No evidence to support classical God
- Against Paley
- World isn't a machine
- Not a good analogy
- Universe grows on its own
- World isn't a machine
- Humans dont have
sufficient knowledge to
conclude there is only
one designer.
- Kant
- The universe may be in chaos
- We impose deisgn
- We impose deisgn
- Argues against Swinburne and Tennant
- We only see order because it is based on the
only experiences we know
- The universe may be in chaos
- Mill
- Designer couldn't be the God of classical theism
- Evil and suffering
- Designer couldn't be the God of classical theism
- Dawkins
- Agreed with Dawrin
- God isn't necessary to explain the universe
- God isn't necessary to explain the universe
- Natural selection gives appearance of design
- Mistaken belief in God
- Mistaken belief in God
- Agreed with Dawrin
¿Quieres crear tus propios Mapas Mentales gratis con GoConqr? Más información.