¡GoConqr estrena diseño! Cuéntanos qué te parece.

Mapa mental

Evaluation of Augustine's Theodicy

Heloise Tudor A-level Religious Studies A-level Inglés 1.378 visitas

Contenido del mapa

Evaluation of Augustine's Theodicy

  1. ·

    • Brian Davies: evil isn't a substance, it's a gap between what is and what ought to be. God isn't to blame.
    • Plantinga: humans wouldn't be free if they could only choose to be good. Free will supports the idea that humans are responsible for evil.
    • He explains why evil can exist alongside goodness.
    • He explains why God chooses to not intervene.
    • He accounts for natural evil
    • It fits the Christian creation story
  2. ·

    • Schleiermacher: a logical contradiction to say a perfect world went wrong. Evil may be a deprivation but it's still present in the world.
    • Relies on the story of Adam and Eve, there's no proof of this. The Bible shouldn't be taken literally.
    • Biology proves people can't have been seminally present in Adam, so God would be unjust to punish everyone.

Información

Descripción
A mindmap evaluating Augustine's Theodicy. Green = the strengths and supporters of the argument. Red = the weaknesses and critics of the argument.
Creado por
Heloise Tudor
Visitas
1.378
Valoración

Escríbenos

¿Sobre qué es tu mensaje?

¿Qué te parece el nuevo diseño?

¿Te gusta?