GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Mind map

Evaluation of Augustine's Theodicy

Heloise Tudor A-level Religious Studies A-level English 1,378 views

Map content

Evaluation of Augustine's Theodicy

  1. ·

    • Brian Davies: evil isn't a substance, it's a gap between what is and what ought to be. God isn't to blame.
    • Plantinga: humans wouldn't be free if they could only choose to be good. Free will supports the idea that humans are responsible for evil.
    • He explains why evil can exist alongside goodness.
    • He explains why God chooses to not intervene.
    • He accounts for natural evil
    • It fits the Christian creation story
  2. ·

    • Schleiermacher: a logical contradiction to say a perfect world went wrong. Evil may be a deprivation but it's still present in the world.
    • Relies on the story of Adam and Eve, there's no proof of this. The Bible shouldn't be taken literally.
    • Biology proves people can't have been seminally present in Adam, so God would be unjust to punish everyone.

Information

Description
A mindmap evaluating Augustine's Theodicy. Green = the strengths and supporters of the argument. Red = the weaknesses and critics of the argument.
Created by
Heloise Tudor
Views
1,378
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?