Test
International Ethic Codes
Crea una cuenta gratis para terminar este test
Guarda tu progreso y consulta tu resultado final.
¿Ya tienes cuenta? Inicia sesión
Preguntas del test (12)
1Is not a feature of the Nuremberg Code
- Ainformed consent needs to be in written form
- Bresearch needs to come from past animal studies
- Cbased on principles of natural law and human rights
- Dexperiment needs to be conducted be a scientifically qualified persons
2Who created the Nuremberg Code?
- AWorld Medical Association
- BInternational Military Tribunal
- CCochrane Collection
- DWorld Health Organisation
3Which is a not a limitation of the Helsinki Declaration
- Aweak centrality of informed consent
- BHad doctor's interest at heart, not the patient's
- Cit was an incomplete guide to research ethics
- Dit has become politicised
4Which is a not a limitation to the Nuremberg Code
- AWas a reaction by the US to Nazi - non nazi doctor felt it was irrelevant to them
- BAn incomplete guide to research ethics
- CFails to address necessity of proper care + benefit to community
- DRequired the supervision of a doctor at all times
5Which are strengths of the Nuremberg Code
- Abased on principles of natural law and human rights
- Boutlined the need for scientific and moral justification
- Coutlined informed consent needed to be written
- Dvery clear articulation of need for informed consent
- Estated that research risk is only just if it benefited entire population
6Which are limitations of the Nuremberg Code
- AIt was the US response to the Nazi - Non-nazi physicians felt it was irrelevant to them
- BSome argued it was not about the consent of these experiments
- CRigidness of consent implemented
- DHad doctors interest at heart
- EIt has become too politicized
- Fhad no explanatory notes - different interpretations always
- Gdidnt talk bout children or patients or mentally impaired
7What were the 5 points of the Helsinki Declaration
- AScientific and Moral justification
- BPrinciple of Respect
- CPrinciple of Beneficence
- DWritten informed consent
- EAddressing experimentation on healthy subjects
- FCompleting guide for research ethics
- GAddressing experimentation on sick subjects
- HConsidering utility and need for research
- IPrudence and Discretion of Publication
8What does the current Declaration of Helsinki declare
- Aneed for scientific and moral justification
- Bneed to set out rationale of experiemnt
- Cthat the interest of scientist is paramount
- Dthat the interest of subject is paramount
- Ereview by independent ethics
- Fit is no longer a guide but something that takes over law
- Grigidness of consent
- Hneed for respect of persons
- Isets out basic principle of respect
- Jneed to follow research of animals and literature reviews
9Strength of Helsinki
- Arigidness of consent
- Bmost well known
- Cputs the patient interest first
- Dexplains importance of benefiting society not just science
- Efocuses on research conduction
10Limitations of the Helsinki Declaration
- AInternal conflict between statements
- Btoo rigid about consent
- Chas become politicised
- Dsoftens informed consent
- Enon-nazi doctors felt it was irrelevant
- Fhas patients interest at heart
- Gdidnt address vulnerable populations
- HHas no explanatory notes so lots of different interpretations
11Principles of the Belmont report
- ARespect
- BReport-writing
- CBeneficence
- DNon-maleficence
- EConfidentiality
- FJustice
12The Belmont Report works in conjuunction with he Protection of Human Subject Law
- AVerdadero
- BFalso
Información
- Descripción
- Psychology Test sobre International Ethic Codes, creado por Jessica Dang el 06/08/2020.
- Autor
- Jessica Dang
- Idioma
- English
- Visitas
- 0
- Etiquetas
- Valoración
- Aún sin valoraciones Valora este test