1502318
| Question | Answer |
| EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERS | Relationship – intersection instead of 1 group being completely subsumed by another group we have 2 groups that happen to share some share of overlap Ex: Venn diagram – size of intersection between the relation of one idea and another idea (dogs & things that are cute) |
| EQ indicator: SOME | "Some speaks of a range” Definition of “some” is at least 1 Starts at 1 to 100 (does not include 0) Lower bound: 1 Upper bound: 100 |
| “MANY” = “SOME” | On the LSAT, the word “many” just means “some” |
| “MOST” STATEMENTS | Intersection between two ideas Definition for “Most” is half plus 1 Lower bound: 51 Upper bound: 100 Also speaks of a range |
| “FEW” STATEMENTS | Definition of “few” is some are, most are not Ex: [Few] dogs (D) are evil (E) 1. Some dogs are evil – D some E (and) 2. Most dogs are not evil- D –most- > /E On the LSAT "few" focuses on MOST ARE NOT |
| ADVANCED: ALL IMPLIES MOST IMPLIES SOME | All → Most → Some All → Some |
| The three EQ logical indicators are | “some” which means at least 1 up to all; “most” which means half plus 1 up to all; and “few” which usually means some are and most are not. |
| NEGATE SOME STATEMENTS | Some – None Ex: Some dogs are brave D some B Negate [No] dogs are brave D→ /B B→ /D All- Some Not |
| NEGATE ALL STATEMENTS | All- Some… Not… (0-99) Ex: All cats(C) are pretentious (P) C→P Negate: [Some] cats are not pretentious C some /P |
| VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (4 OF 9) | A some B→ C _______________ A some C |
| VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (5 OF 9) | A-most->B→C ____________________ A-most→C |
| VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (6 of 9) | A→B A→C ________ B some C |
| VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (7 of 9) | A→B A some C ___________ B some C |
| VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (8 of 9) | A→B A—most-->C _____________ B some C |
| VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (9 of 9) | A—most-->B A—most-->C ________________ B some C |
0 comments
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.