Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Eyewitness Testimony

Description

ALEVEL PSYCHOLOGY Flashcards on Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Eyewitness Testimony, created by Dhara Bechra on 30/04/2017.
Dhara Bechra
Flashcards by Dhara Bechra, updated more than 1 year ago
Dhara Bechra
Created by Dhara Bechra almost 7 years ago
11
3

Resource summary

Question Answer
Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Eyewitness Testimony Memory is reconstructive. It investigates the accuracy of eyewitness testimony and the factors affecting it.
Aims & Research Questions To investigate the effect of questioning on witness memory of a car accident. Investigate effect of leading question on eyewitness memory. Investigate whether leading questions distort memory of an event.
Research Method 2 Lab experiments Independent Design IV: verb used in critical question DV: mean estimate speed of car
Sample Experiment 1: 45 students from USA randomly allocated to 5 groups of 9. Experiment 2: 150 students randomly allocated to 3 groups of 50.
Procedure Experiment 1: students watched video of car accident. After pp's asked to write what they had seen, then given a questionnaire which included a critical question. 'How fast were the cars going when they ****** into each other?'
Procedure (2) Pp's divided into 5 groups and each received different variation of the same question, containing the verb 'contacted, hit, bumped, collided, smashed'.
Procedure (3) Experiment 2: 150 pp's shown film of car accident and given a questionnaire. Group 1 asked question containing word 'hit'. Group 2 asked question containing word 'smashed'. Group 3 (control group) not asked question.
Procedure (4) Week later, pp's returned and asked further questions, including critical question 'Did you see any broken glass?' (no broken glass in film)
Results Experiment 1: The leading question did affect pp's perception of speed. Pp's who heard word 'smashed' gave a higher estimate than those who heard word 'contacted' or 'hit'.
Results (2) Experiment 2: Pp's who thought car was traveling faster, more likely to produce false memory of seeing broken glass than others. Suggests their memory was changed by the way they were questioned.
Conclusion Loftus and Palmer concluded that the semantics of the question became integrated with memory of event.
Evaluation High control Quantitative data collected Low EV- doesn't represent real life settings Replicable as its controlled and standardised.
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

History of Psychology
mia.rigby
Biological Psychology - Stress
Gurdev Manchanda
Bowlby's Theory of Attachment
Jessica Phillips
Psychology subject map
Jake Pickup
Psychology A1
Ellie Hughes
Memory Key words
Sammy :P
Psychology | Unit 4 | Addiction - Explanations
showmestarlight
The Biological Approach to Psychology
Gabby Wood
Chapter 5: Short-term and Working Memory
krupa8711
Cognitive Psychology - Capacity and encoding
T W
Psychology and the MCAT
Sarah Egan